StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Version Control
  4. Version Control System
  5. GitHub Enterprise vs SVN (Subversion)

GitHub Enterprise vs SVN (Subversion)

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Stacks791
Followers629
Votes43
GitHub Stars614
Forks188
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Stacks500
Followers627
Votes10

GitHub Enterprise vs SVN (Subversion): What are the differences?

## Introduction

  1. Collaboration and Communication: GitHub Enterprise provides a more collaborative and communicative environment through features like pull requests, code reviews, issue tracking, and wikis. On the other hand, SVN lacks these integrated collaborative tools and relies more on email communication for code reviews and collaboration.

  2. Scalability and Performance: GitHub Enterprise is designed to handle large-scale projects and teams, offering high performance and scalability with features like distributed version control and efficient branching and merging capabilities. In contrast, SVN may face performance issues with larger repositories and teams due to its centralized architecture.

  3. Community and Ecosystem: GitHub Enterprise benefits from a vibrant community of developers contributing to open-source projects, creating a rich ecosystem of third-party integrations, plugins, and tools. SVN, being a more traditional version control system, has a smaller community and a limited ecosystem of add-ons and extensions.

  4. Visibility and Transparency: GitHub Enterprise provides greater visibility and transparency into the project's history, changes, and contributors through its user-friendly interface, detailed commit histories, and activity feeds. SVN, being more command-line oriented, may lack the same level of visibility and transparency for non-technical users.

  5. Access Control and Permissions: GitHub Enterprise offers more granular access control and permission management options, allowing administrators to define roles, permissions, and branch restrictions for different team members. In SVN, access control is more limited, with fewer options for fine-tuning permissions and managing user roles.

  6. Integration and Automation: GitHub Enterprise is well-integrated with popular developer tools and services, allowing for seamless automation of workflows through integrations with CI/CD tools, issue trackers, project management platforms, and more. SVN, while adaptable to integration through scripts and plugins, may require more manual effort to achieve the same level of automation and workflow optimization.

In Summary, GitHub Enterprise and SVN differ in terms of collaboration features, scalability, community support, visibility, access control, and integration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise

Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.

GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.

-
Compliance and auditing;Hundreds of integrations;Flexible deployment;Centralized permissions;Powerful dashboards;Technical support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
614
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
188
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
791
Stacks
500
Followers
629
Followers
627
Votes
43
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 20
    Easy to use
  • 13
    Simple code versioning
  • 5
    User/Access Management
  • 3
    Complicated code versionioning by Subversion
  • 2
    Free
Cons
  • 7
    Branching and tagging use tons of disk space
Pros
  • 4
    Expensive - $$$
  • 2
    CDCI with Github Actions
  • 2
    Code security
  • 1
    Both Cloud and Enterprise Server Versions available
  • 1
    Draft Pull Request
Cons
  • 2
    $$$

What are some alternatives to SVN (Subversion), GitHub Enterprise?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Git

Git

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Mercurial

Mercurial

Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana