GitKraken vs Upsource

Overview

Upsource

Stacks51

Followers77

Votes58

GitKraken

Stacks725

Followers909

Votes290

GitKraken vs Upsource: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Key differences between GitKraken and Upsource are listed below:

1. **User Interface**: GitKraken has a user-friendly and visually appealing interface with drag and drop functionality, which makes it easier for beginners to navigate. On the other hand, Upsource has a more text-based interface that may be overwhelming for users without prior experience.
   
2. **Integration with Git Services**: GitKraken seamlessly integrates with popular git services like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, providing a smoother experience for users who already use these platforms. In contrast, Upsource focuses more on integration with JetBrains tools like IntelliJ IDEA and may not have as extensive integration options with other services.

3. **Collaboration Features**: GitKraken offers built-in project management and collaboration tools like task boards and issue tracking, allowing teams to work together more efficiently within the platform. Upsource, on the other hand, is more focused on code review and analysis features, offering in-depth code insights but may lack some of the team collaboration tools provided by GitKraken.

4. **Cost**: GitKraken is more cost-effective for small to medium-sized teams, offering a free version for personal use and affordable pricing options for teams. In contrast, Upsource may be more expensive, especially for larger teams, as it is part of JetBrains' suite of developer tools which comes with a higher price tag.

5. **Performance**: GitKraken is known for its fast performance, with smooth operations even when working with large repositories. Upsource, while still performing well, may experience slower speeds when handling complex codebases or performing extensive code analyses.

6. **Code Review Process**: While both GitKraken and Upsource offer code review functionalities, the process may vary slightly. GitKraken focuses on a simpler, streamlined code review process, making it easier for developers to review and approve code changes quickly. In contrast, Upsource provides more advanced code analysis features and a more detailed code review process, which may be more suitable for teams requiring thorough code inspections.

In Summary, GitKraken and Upsource differ in their user interface, integration with git services, collaboration features, cost, performance, and code review process.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Upsource	GitKraken
Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.	The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.
Instantly access all your projects;Keep track of code changes;Use code insight in Java projects;Explore any revision of your code base;Discuss and review code;Share links to code	-
Statistics
Stacks 51	Stacks 725
Followers 77	Followers 909
Votes 58	Votes 290
Pros & Cons
Pros 15 Free for 10 users 12 Good code review 8 IDE integration 8 Java code inspections and navigation 3 Simple to use Cons 3 Very Large Server Footprint. Very large	Pros 60 Dark theme 34 Best linux git client 29 Great overview 21 Full featured client 21 Gitflow support Cons 4 No edit/fixup in interactive rebase 4 Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree) 4 Extremely slow when working with large repositories 3 Do not allow to directly edit staging area 3 Not as many features as sourcetree
Integrations
GitHub Git Mercurial SVN (Subversion) Perforce	Git

What are some alternatives to Upsource, GitKraken?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

SourceTree

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Related Comparisons

GitKraken vs Upsource: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Key differences between GitKraken and Upsource are listed below:

1. **User Interface**: GitKraken has a user-friendly and visually appealing interface with drag and drop functionality, which makes it easier for beginners to navigate. On the other hand, Upsource has a more text-based interface that may be overwhelming for users without prior experience.
   
2. **Integration with Git Services**: GitKraken seamlessly integrates with popular git services like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, providing a smoother experience for users who already use these platforms. In contrast, Upsource focuses more on integration with JetBrains tools like IntelliJ IDEA and may not have as extensive integration options with other services.

3. **Collaboration Features**: GitKraken offers built-in project management and collaboration tools like task boards and issue tracking, allowing teams to work together more efficiently within the platform. Upsource, on the other hand, is more focused on code review and analysis features, offering in-depth code insights but may lack some of the team collaboration tools provided by GitKraken.

4. **Cost**: GitKraken is more cost-effective for small to medium-sized teams, offering a free version for personal use and affordable pricing options for teams. In contrast, Upsource may be more expensive, especially for larger teams, as it is part of JetBrains' suite of developer tools which comes with a higher price tag.

5. **Performance**: GitKraken is known for its fast performance, with smooth operations even when working with large repositories. Upsource, while still performing well, may experience slower speeds when handling complex codebases or performing extensive code analyses.

6. **Code Review Process**: While both GitKraken and Upsource offer code review functionalities, the process may vary slightly. GitKraken focuses on a simpler, streamlined code review process, making it easier for developers to review and approve code changes quickly. In contrast, Upsource provides more advanced code analysis features and a more detailed code review process, which may be more suitable for teams requiring thorough code inspections.

In Summary, GitKraken and Upsource differ in their user interface, integration with git services, collaboration features, cost, performance, and code review process.

GitKraken vs Upsource

Overview