GitLab vs TeamForge

Overview

GitLab

Stacks63.4K

Followers54.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

TeamForge

Stacks0

Followers1

Votes0

GitLab vs TeamForge: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitLab and TeamForge are both popular platform for source code management and version control. However, there are several key differences between these two platforms.

Integration of DevOps Tools: GitLab provides comprehensive support for the entire DevOps lifecycle, including features like CI/CD, container registry, and monitoring. On the other hand, TeamForge focuses more on source code management and lacks advanced DevOps capabilities. GitLab's integrated approach allows for better collaboration and streamlining of the development process.
Open Source Collaboration: GitLab is an open source platform, which means that the source code is freely available and can be customized to meet specific requirements. On the other hand, TeamForge is a proprietary platform and does not offer the same level of customization. GitLab's open source nature encourages a strong community of contributors and enables faster innovation.
Scalability and Performance: GitLab is known for its scalability and performance, with the ability to handle large repositories and a high number of concurrent users. TeamForge, although suitable for smaller teams and projects, may face limitations when it comes to scaling up. GitLab's robust infrastructure allows for efficient handling of large codebases and ensures smooth user experience.
Built-in Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD): GitLab comes with a built-in CI/CD pipeline that allows for automated testing, building, and deploying applications. This feature greatly simplifies the development process and ensures faster time to market. TeamForge, on the other hand, does not offer a built-in CI/CD pipeline and requires additional tools for achieving the same level of automation and efficiency.
Container Registry: GitLab provides a container registry that allows developers to store and manage Docker images. This feature helps in deploying applications with ease and promotes the use of containerization. TeamForge does not have a built-in container registry, which may add complexity to the deployment process for containerized applications.
Pricing and Licensing: GitLab offers various pricing options, including a free tier, which makes it accessible to both small and large organizations. Additionally, GitLab's open source version is freely available. TeamForge, on the other hand, is a commercial product and requires a license to use. GitLab's flexible pricing model makes it a more cost-effective choice for many organizations.

In summary, GitLab and TeamForge differ in terms of their integration of DevOps tools, open source collaboration, scalability and performance, built-in CI/CD capabilities, container registry support, and pricing/licensing options. GitLab offers a more comprehensive and flexible solution for modern software development processes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

GitLab	TeamForge
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.	TeamForge is an Application Lifecycle Manager to help deliver high-quality applications for your customers at speed. Boost development productivity with Agile, Continuous Integration (CI), Continuous Delivery (CD), and DevOps. Equip cross-functional teams with best-of-breed tools, while maintaining governance, compliance, and code security standards.
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails	Third-party tool integration; Supports Git and SVN; Enterprise Grade SCM; Share permissions across GIT and SVN repositories; Workflow automation; Project category mapping; Code reuse; code search; project-focused rollups; reporting; monitoring; analysis; Business intelligence dashboard; Communities; wikis; discussion boards; Peer code reviews; review and approval workflows
Statistics
GitHub Stars 0	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 63.4K	Stacks 0
Followers 54.5K	Followers 1
Votes 2.5K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 508 Self hosted 431 Free 339 Has community edition 242 Easy setup 240 Familiar interface Cons 28 Slow ui performance 9 Introduce breaking bugs every release 6 Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting) 2 Built-in Docker Registry 1 Review Apps feature	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to GitLab, TeamForge?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

GitLab vs TeamForge: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitLab and TeamForge are both popular platform for source code management and version control. However, there are several key differences between these two platforms.

Integration of DevOps Tools: GitLab provides comprehensive support for the entire DevOps lifecycle, including features like CI/CD, container registry, and monitoring. On the other hand, TeamForge focuses more on source code management and lacks advanced DevOps capabilities. GitLab's integrated approach allows for better collaboration and streamlining of the development process.
Open Source Collaboration: GitLab is an open source platform, which means that the source code is freely available and can be customized to meet specific requirements. On the other hand, TeamForge is a proprietary platform and does not offer the same level of customization. GitLab's open source nature encourages a strong community of contributors and enables faster innovation.
Scalability and Performance: GitLab is known for its scalability and performance, with the ability to handle large repositories and a high number of concurrent users. TeamForge, although suitable for smaller teams and projects, may face limitations when it comes to scaling up. GitLab's robust infrastructure allows for efficient handling of large codebases and ensures smooth user experience.
Built-in Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD): GitLab comes with a built-in CI/CD pipeline that allows for automated testing, building, and deploying applications. This feature greatly simplifies the development process and ensures faster time to market. TeamForge, on the other hand, does not offer a built-in CI/CD pipeline and requires additional tools for achieving the same level of automation and efficiency.
Container Registry: GitLab provides a container registry that allows developers to store and manage Docker images. This feature helps in deploying applications with ease and promotes the use of containerization. TeamForge does not have a built-in container registry, which may add complexity to the deployment process for containerized applications.
Pricing and Licensing: GitLab offers various pricing options, including a free tier, which makes it accessible to both small and large organizations. Additionally, GitLab's open source version is freely available. TeamForge, on the other hand, is a commercial product and requires a license to use. GitLab's flexible pricing model makes it a more cost-effective choice for many organizations.

GitLab vs TeamForge

Overview

GitLab vs TeamForge: What are the differences?