StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitLab vs Visual Studio Code

GitLab vs Visual Studio Code

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Stacks186.5K
Followers169.1K
Votes2.3K
GitHub Stars178.2K
Forks35.9K

GitLab vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitLab and Visual Studio Code are both widely used tools in the software development industry. While they serve different purposes, there are several key differences between the two. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail.

  1. Integration with Version Control Systems: GitLab is a web-based Git repository manager that provides a complete DevOps platform, allowing teams to collaborate on code, manage repositories, and automate CI/CD pipelines. On the other hand, Visual Studio Code is a lightweight source code editor that offers seamless integration with various version control systems, including Git. While GitLab provides a comprehensive platform for managing code repositories, Visual Studio Code focuses primarily on code editing and version control integration.

  2. Development Environment: GitLab offers a built-in development environment, known as the GitLab Development Kit (GDK), which allows developers to set up a complete development environment with all the necessary tools and dependencies. In contrast, Visual Studio Code is primarily a code editor and allows developers to customize their development environment by installing extensions for specific languages or frameworks. GitLab provides a more integrated and streamlined development environment, while Visual Studio Code offers flexibility and customization options.

  3. Collaboration and Project Management: GitLab provides features for collaboration and project management, including issue tracking, project boards, and merge request management. It offers a centralized platform for teams to collaborate on code, track project progress, and manage development workflows. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, focuses primarily on individual code editing and does not provide built-in features for project management or collaboration. It is often used in conjunction with other tools, such as GitLab, for team collaboration and project management.

  4. Extensions and Customization: Visual Studio Code offers a wide range of extensions that can be installed to enhance its functionality and support various programming languages and frameworks. These extensions provide additional features, such as code linting, debugging, and integrated terminals. GitLab, being a web-based platform, does not offer the same level of customization and extension support as Visual Studio Code. While GitLab provides a comprehensive set of features, it may not have the same level of flexibility for customization as Visual Studio Code.

  5. Deployment and Infrastructure Management: GitLab provides built-in features for continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD), allowing teams to automate the build, test, and deployment processes. It also offers Kubernetes integration for managing containerized applications. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, focuses primarily on code editing and does not provide built-in features for deployment or infrastructure management. It is typically used in conjunction with other tools, such as GitLab's CI/CD pipelines or cloud platforms like Azure, for deploying and managing applications.

  6. Accessibility and Platform Support: Visual Studio Code is a cross-platform code editor and is available on Windows, macOS, and Linux operating systems. It provides a consistent experience across different platforms and can be easily set up on various environments. GitLab, being a web-based platform, is accessible from any device with a web browser and an internet connection. It does not require any installation or setup on individual machines. GitLab offers more accessibility and platform independence compared to Visual Studio Code.

In summary, GitLab is a comprehensive web-based platform for code management, collaboration, and CI/CD, providing a complete DevOps solution. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, is a lightweight code editor with seamless version control integration and extensive customization options. While GitLab focuses on providing an integrated development environment and project management features, Visual Studio Code offers flexibility and customization for developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab, Visual Studio Code

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab
GitLab
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.

Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Combines UI of a modern editor with code assistance and navigation; Integrated debugging experience
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
178.2K
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
35.9K
Stacks
63.4K
Stacks
186.5K
Followers
54.5K
Followers
169.1K
Votes
2.5K
Votes
2.3K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Pros
  • 341
    Powerful multilanguage IDE
  • 310
    Fast
  • 194
    Front-end develop out of the box
  • 158
    Support TypeScript IntelliSense
  • 142
    Very basic but free
Cons
  • 46
    Slow startup
  • 29
    Resource hog at times
  • 20
    Poor refactoring
  • 14
    Poor UI Designer
  • 11
    Weak Ui design tools

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Visual Studio Code?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Sublime Text

Sublime Text

Sublime Text is available for OS X, Windows and Linux. One license is all you need to use Sublime Text on every computer you own, no matter what operating system it uses. Sublime Text uses a custom UI toolkit, optimized for speed and beauty, while taking advantage of native functionality on each platform.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Atom

Atom

At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.

Vim

Vim

Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete feature set. Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX systems. Vim is distributed free as charityware.

Notepad++

Notepad++

Notepad++ is a free (as in "free speech" and also as in "free beer") source code editor and Notepad replacement that supports several languages. Running in the MS Windows environment, its use is governed by GPL License.

Emacs

Emacs

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Brackets

Brackets

With focused visual tools and preprocessor support, it is a modern text editor that makes it easy to design in the browser.

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana