GitLab vs ZenHub

Overview

GitLab

Stacks63.4K

Followers54.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

ZenHub

Stacks250

Followers230

Votes308

GitLab vs ZenHub: What are the differences?

Introduction:

GitLab and ZenHub are both project management tools used in the software development process. While they have some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart.

1. Workflow Integration: GitLab is an integrated DevOps platform that provides a complete solution from code repositories to deployment. It offers features like version control, code review, continuous integration, and continuous deployment. On the other hand, ZenHub is specifically designed for agile project management and integrates with existing project management solutions like GitHub, allowing developers to manage their work using Kanban boards and burndown charts.

2. Issue Tracking: GitLab has a robust issue tracking system that allows developers to create, assign, and categorize issues, as well as track their progress. It provides features like issue boards, labels, and milestones for effective issue management. ZenHub, on the other hand, provides enhanced issue tracking capabilities by adding additional features like prioritization, estimation, and dependencies to the existing GitHub issue tracking system.

3. Collaboration Tools: GitLab offers a range of collaboration tools to facilitate communication and collaboration among developers, such as code review, comments, merge requests, and a web IDE. ZenHub, on the other hand, focuses more on visual project management tools, providing features like drag-and-drop Kanban boards, task boards, and burndown charts to help teams visualize their work and identify bottlenecks.

4. Pricing Model: GitLab offers both a free open-source version and a paid version with additional features and support. The paid version is available as a self-managed solution or can be hosted on GitLab's cloud infrastructure. ZenHub, on the other hand, offers a free version with limited features and a paid version with additional features such as advanced reporting, automation, and integrations.

5. Integration with Third-Party Services: GitLab offers a wide range of integrations with third-party services, such as Jira, Jenkins, Slack, and Salesforce, allowing teams to integrate their existing tools and workflows with GitLab. ZenHub, on the other hand, primarily integrates with GitHub, as it is built as an extension for GitHub's project management capabilities.

6. Deployment Options: GitLab provides flexible deployment options, allowing teams to choose between self-hosting on their own infrastructure or using GitLab's cloud infrastructure. ZenHub, on the other hand, is a cloud-based solution and does not offer self-hosting options.

In summary, GitLab is a comprehensive DevOps platform that integrates various stages of the software development process, while ZenHub focuses more on agile project management features and integrates with existing project management solutions like GitHub. GitLab provides robust issue tracking, collaboration tools, and offers flexible deployment options, while ZenHub enhances GitHub's project management capabilities with additional features and visualizations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GitLab, ZenHub

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab	ZenHub
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.	ZenHub powers agile development and product roadmapping for some of the world's most innovative teams. It's a better way to manage your GitHub Issues, Multi-repo Boards, Epics, and reports -- all without ever leaving GitHub. Experience data
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails	Product Roadmap, Multi-Repo Task Board Support; Slack integration; Reporting Suite, Velocity Chart, Release Reports, Cumulative Flow, Burndown Charts; Time Estimations; Kanban-like Task Boards; Any-type File Uploads; +1 Button on GitHub issues
Statistics
GitHub Stars 0	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 63.4K	Stacks 250
Followers 54.5K	Followers 230
Votes 2.5K	Votes 308
Pros & Cons
Pros 508 Self hosted 431 Free 339 Has community edition 242 Easy setup 240 Familiar interface Cons 28 Slow ui performance 9 Introduce breaking bugs every release 6 Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting) 2 Built-in Docker Registry 1 Review Apps feature	Pros 74 Don't have to leave github 53 No context switching, use github for everything 38 Fast and effective team support 36 Github integration 33 The board makes easier to prioritize
Integrations
No integrations available	Slack GitHub

What are some alternatives to GitLab, ZenHub?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

waffle.io

Track priority and rank for your GitHub issues across multiple repositories. Automatically see issues moved across a board for you, when you open pull requests or create branches.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Codetree

Codetree is a project management app deeply integrated with GitHub issues -- every issue in Codetree corresponds directly to an issue on GitHub. We offer both a compact list view and kanban taskboards.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

HuBoard

Adds a lightweight kanban board to GitHub issues, instantly adding project management to your GitHub projects. HuBoard is built from the ground up using the GitHub public API. HuBoard issues are GitHub issues, you will never have to deal with syncronization problems.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Related Comparisons

GitLab vs ZenHub: What are the differences?

Introduction:

GitLab and ZenHub are both project management tools used in the software development process. While they have some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart.

GitLab vs ZenHub

Overview