StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Gitolite vs SourceTree

Gitolite vs SourceTree

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gitolite
Gitolite
Stacks38
Followers87
Votes12
GitHub Stars8.5K
Forks1.0K
SourceTree
SourceTree
Stacks10.6K
Followers8.1K
Votes727

Gitolite vs SourceTree: What are the differences?

Introduction

Git and SourceTree are two popular tools used for version control and managing code repositories. Gitolite is a tool used for managing access control to Git repositories, while SourceTree is a graphical user interface client for Git.

  1. Installation and Setup: Gitolite is a server-side tool that needs to be installed on a server, configured through SSH, and managed via command-line tools. SourceTree, on the other hand, is a desktop client that needs to be installed on individual machines and provides a user-friendly interface for interacting with Git repositories without the need for extensive command-line knowledge.

  2. Access Control: Gitolite is focused on access control, allowing administrators to control who can read, write, or execute various operations on repositories. SourceTree, on the other hand, primarily focuses on providing a visual interface for interacting with repositories and does not offer the same level of granular access control features as Gitolite.

  3. Workflow Management: Gitolite is more suitable for managing complex workflows and permissions within a centralized repository setup. SourceTree, on the other hand, is geared towards providing a simple and intuitive interface for individual developers or small teams to work with their code repositories, without the need for extensive configuration.

  4. Integration with Hosting Services: SourceTree provides integrations with popular hosting services like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, allowing users to seamlessly work with repositories hosted on these platforms. Gitolite, being a server-side tool, does not offer the same level of integration with external hosting services and is more focused on managing repositories within a local or dedicated server environment.

  5. Community Support: SourceTree has a larger user base and a more active community, which can be beneficial for getting support, finding resources, and troubleshooting issues. Gitolite, although widely used, may have a smaller user community, which can result in limited resources or support options for users facing challenges with the tool.

  6. User Experience: SourceTree is designed to provide a user-friendly and visually appealing interface for interacting with Git repositories, making it suitable for beginners or those who prefer a more graphical approach to version control. Gitolite, being more command-line focused, may not offer the same level of user experience in terms of visual representation and ease of use.

In Summary, Gitolite and SourceTree offer different approaches to managing Git repositories, with Gitolite focusing on access control and centralized workflow management, while SourceTree provides a user-friendly interface for individual developers and smaller teams to work with their code repositories.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Gitolite, SourceTree

Stefan
Stefan

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.

It allows

  • to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie)
  • it helps to investigate the history
  • most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.
198k views198k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Gitolite
Gitolite
SourceTree
SourceTree

Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

Use a single unix user ("real" user) on the server.;Provide access to many gitolite users: they are not "real" users, so they do not get shell access.;Control access to many git repositories: read access controlled at the repo level, and write access controlled at the branch/tag/file/directory level, including who can rewind, create, and delete branches/tags.;Can be installed without root access, assuming git and perl are already installed.;Authentication is most commonly done using sshd, but you can also use "smart http" mode if you prefer (this may require root access to setup).
Full-powered DVCS;Create, clone, commit, push, pull, merge, and more are all just a click away.;Review your outgoing and incoming changesets, cherry-pick between branches, patch handling, rebase, stash, shelve, and much more.;Use Git-flow and Hg-flow with ease. Keep your repositories cleaner and your development more efficient with SourceTree's intuitive interface to Git and Hg's 'branchy' development model.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
38
Stacks
10.6K
Followers
87
Followers
8.1K
Votes
12
Votes
727
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Easy setup
  • 4
    Fine-tuned per-branch permissions
  • 1
    Free
  • 1
    Free multi-server mirroring
  • 1
    Really easy setup
Cons
  • 1
    Doesn't have any user interface
  • 1
    Antiquated
  • 1
    No tools for project and issue tracker
Pros
  • 205
    Visual history and branch view
  • 164
    Beautiful UI
  • 134
    Easy repository browsing
  • 87
    Gitflow support
  • 75
    Interactive stage or discard by hunks or lines
Cons
  • 12
    Crashes often
  • 8
    So many bugs
  • 7
    Fetching is slow sometimes
  • 5
    Extremely slow
  • 5
    Very unstable
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub
Git
Git
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Windows
Windows
macOS
macOS
Mercurial
Mercurial

What are some alternatives to Gitolite, SourceTree?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

GitKraken

GitKraken

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Fork

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Tower

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana