Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
GNU Bash vs Ruby: What are the differences?
**Introduction:**
Here, we will discuss the key differences between GNU Bash and Ruby.
**1. Syntax and Purpose:** GNU Bash is primarily used as a command-line interpreter and scripting language for automating tasks and system administration, while Ruby is a general-purpose programming language known for its flexibility and readability in web development and application programming.
**2. Paradigm:** GNU Bash follows a procedural programming paradigm with some limited functional programming capabilities, whereas Ruby is a fully object-oriented programming language that supports functional programming and metaprogramming concepts extensively.
**3. Scripting Capabilities:** Bash is highly optimized for writing quick and efficient scripts, especially for system tasks, file manipulation, and system administration, whereas Ruby's scripting abilities are more versatile, allowing for advanced automation, web development, and creating complex algorithms.
**4. Libraries and Frameworks:** Ruby has a rich ecosystem of libraries and frameworks, such as Rails and Sinatra, that make it easier to build web applications and APIs, while Bash lacks the extensive libraries and frameworks that can be found in Ruby for diverse development purposes.
**5. Standardization:** Bash follows the POSIX standard for shell scripting, ensuring portability across different Unix-based systems, while Ruby has its own language specifications and implementation that might require additional dependencies for compatibility on various platforms.
**6. Community and Support:** The Bash community is focused on system administrators and scripting enthusiasts, offering extensive guides and resources for shell scripting, while the Ruby community is broader, catering to web developers, software engineers, and researchers, providing a vast array of tutorials, forums, and tools for support.
In Summary, the key differences between GNU Bash and Ruby lie in their syntax, purpose, paradigm, scripting capabilities, available libraries, standardization, and community support.
In 2015 as Xelex Digital was paving a new technology path, moving from ASP.NET web services and web applications, we knew that we wanted to move to a more modular decoupled base of applications centered around REST APIs.
To that end we spent several months studying API design patterns and decided to use our own adaptation of CRUD, specifically a SCRUD pattern that elevates query params to a more central role via the Search action.
Once we nailed down the API design pattern it was time to decide what language(s) our new APIs would be built upon. Our team has always been driven by the right tool for the job rather than what we know best. That said, in balancing practicality we chose to focus on 3 options that our team had deep experience with and knew the pros and cons of.
For us it came down to C#, JavaScript, and Ruby. At the time we owned our infrastructure, racks in cages, that were all loaded with Windows. We were also at a point that we were using that infrastructure to it's fullest and could not afford additional servers running Linux. That's a long way of saying we decided against Ruby as it doesn't play nice on Windows.
That left us with two options. We went a very unconventional route for deciding between the two. We built MVP APIs on both. The interfaces were identical and interchangeable. What we found was easily quantifiable differences.
We were able to iterate on our Node based APIs much more rapidly than we were our C# APIs. For us this was owed to the community coupled with the extremely dynamic nature of JS. There were tradeoffs we considered, latency was (acceptably) higher on requests to our Node APIs. No strong types to protect us from ourselves, but we've rarely found that to be an issue.
As such we decided to commit resources to our Node APIs and push it out as the core brain of our new system. We haven't looked back since. It has consistently met our needs, scaling with us, getting better with time as continually pour into and expand our capabilities.
In December we successfully flipped around half a billion monthly API requests from our Ruby on Rails application to some new Python 3 applications. Our Head of Engineering has written a great article as to why we decided to transition from Ruby on Rails to Python 3! Read more about it in the link below.
When I was evaluating languages to write this app in, I considered either Python or JavaScript at the time. I find Ruby very pleasant to read and write, and the Ruby community has built out a wide variety of test tools and approaches, helping e deliver better software faster. Along with Rails, and the Ruby-first Heroku support, this was an easy decision.
If you have a file (demo.txt
) that has 3 columns:
Column-1 Column-2 Column-3
Row-1a Row-2a Row-3a
Row-1b Row-2b Row-3b
Row-1c Row-2c Row-3c
Row-1d Row-2d Row-3d
Row-1e Row-2e Row-3e
and you want to only view the first column of the file in your CLI, run the following:
awk {'print $1'} demo.txt
Column-1
Row-1a
Row-1b
Row-1c
Row-1d
Row-1e
If you want to print the second column of demo.txt
, just replace $1
with $2
Pros of GNU Bash
- Customizable3
- Powerful scripting language3
- Widely adopted2
- Cross platform0
Pros of Ruby
- Programme friendly608
- Quick to develop538
- Great community492
- Productivity469
- Simplicity432
- Open source274
- Meta-programming235
- Powerful208
- Blocks157
- Powerful one-liners140
- Flexible70
- Easy to learn59
- Easy to start52
- Maintainability42
- Lambdas38
- Procs31
- Fun to write21
- Diverse web frameworks19
- Reads like English14
- Makes me smarter and happier10
- Rails9
- Elegant syntax9
- Very Dynamic8
- Matz7
- Programmer happiness6
- Object Oriented5
- Elegant code4
- Friendly4
- Generally fun but makes you wanna cry sometimes4
- Fun and useful4
- There are so many ways to make it do what you want3
- Easy packaging and modules3
- Primitive types can be tampered with2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of GNU Bash
- Too Slow1
Cons of Ruby
- Memory hog7
- Really slow if you're not really careful7
- Nested Blocks can make code unreadable3
- Encouraging imperative programming2
- No type safety, so it requires copious testing1
- Ambiguous Syntax, such as function parentheses1