Google Cloud Filestore vs Google Cloud Storage

Overview

Google Cloud Storage

Stacks2.0K

Followers1.2K

Votes75

Google Cloud Filestore

Stacks11

Followers105

Votes0

Google Cloud Filestore vs Google Cloud Storage: What are the differences?

Google Cloud Filestore and Google Cloud Storage are both cloud-based storage solutions offered by Google. While they serve the same purpose of storing and managing data, there are some key differences between the two.

Storage Type: Google Cloud Filestore is a fully managed file storage service that provides a high-performance network attached storage (NAS) solution. On the other hand, Google Cloud Storage is an object storage service that allows you to store and retrieve any amount of data from anywhere on the web.
Data Access: With Google Cloud Filestore, you can mount the file shares on Compute Engine instances in the same project and region. This allows you to access the data directly as if it were a local file system. In contrast, Google Cloud Storage provides RESTful APIs, which enables you to access the data programmatically over the internet.
Performance: Google Cloud Filestore is optimized for high performance, providing low latency and high throughput for file-based workloads. It is particularly well-suited for applications that require high-performance file storage, such as content management systems and media processing workflows. In contrast, Google Cloud Storage offers scalable and durable object storage, making it suitable for storing large amounts of unstructured data.
Cost Structure: The pricing model for Google Cloud Filestore is based on the amount of provisioned storage capacity and throughput you require. You pay for the resources you provision, regardless of the actual usage. On the other hand, Google Cloud Storage has a pay-as-you-go model, where you only pay for the actual storage consumed and data transfer.
Data Durability: Google Cloud Storage provides multiple layers of redundancy to ensure high durability and availability of your data. It stores multiple copies of your data across different locations, making it highly resilient to failures. While Google Cloud Filestore also provides redundancy within a single zone, it does not offer the same level of data durability as Google Cloud Storage.
Use Cases: Google Cloud Filestore is suitable for workloads that require shared file access, such as application development and data processing tasks. It is particularly well-suited for applications that require high-performance file storage, such as content management systems and media processing workflows. On the other hand, Google Cloud Storage is ideal for storing and serving static content, backing up data, and hosting websites.

In summary, Google Cloud Filestore is a managed file storage service optimized for high-performance file-based workloads, while Google Cloud Storage is an object storage service designed for storing and retrieving any amount of data from anywhere on the web.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Google Cloud Storage, Google Cloud Filestore

Gabriel

CEO at NaoLogic Inc

Dec 24, 2019

Decided

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

330k views330k

Comments

Ben

May 18, 2020

Decided

We choose Backblaze B2 because it makes more sense for storing static assets.

We admire Backblaze's customer service & transparency, plus, we trust them to maintain fair business practices - including not raising prices in the future.

Lower storage costs means we can keep more data for longer, and lower bandwidth means cache misses don't cost a ton.

120k views120k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud Storage	Google Cloud Filestore
Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.	Cloud Filestore is a managed file storage service for applications that require a filesystem interface and a shared filesystem for data. Filestore gives users a simple, native experience for standing up managed Network Attached Storage (NAS) with their Google Compute Engine and Kubernetes Engine instances. The ability to fine-tune Filestore’s performance and capacity independently leads to predictably fast performance for your file-based workloads.
High Capacity and Scalability;Strong Data Consistency;Google Developers Console Projects;Bucket Locations;REST APIS;OAuth 2.0 Authentication;Authenticated Browser Downloads;Google Account Support for Sharing	Fast - Cloud Filestore offers low latency for file operations. For workloads that are latency sensitive, like content management systems, databases, random i/o, or other metadata intensive applications, Filestore provides high IOPS with minimal variability in performance.; Consistent - With Cloud Filestore, you pay a predictable price for predictable performance. Users independently pick the IOPS and the storage capacity you need with Filestore, which enables you to tune your filesystem for a particular workload. The performance you experience for a particular workload will be consistent over time.; Simple - Cloud Filestore is a fully managed, NoOps service that is integrated with the rest of the Google Cloud portfolio. You can easily mount Filestore volumes on Compute Engine VMs. Filestore is also tightly integrated with Google Kubernetes Engine so your containers can reference the same shared data.
Statistics
Stacks 2.0K	Stacks 11
Followers 1.2K	Followers 105
Votes 75	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 28 Scalable 19 Cheap 14 Reliable 9 Easy 3 Chealp	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Google Kubernetes Engine

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Storage, Google Cloud Filestore?

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

Related Comparisons

Google Cloud Filestore vs Google Cloud Storage: What are the differences?

Storage Type: Google Cloud Filestore is a fully managed file storage service that provides a high-performance network attached storage (NAS) solution. On the other hand, Google Cloud Storage is an object storage service that allows you to store and retrieve any amount of data from anywhere on the web.
Data Access: With Google Cloud Filestore, you can mount the file shares on Compute Engine instances in the same project and region. This allows you to access the data directly as if it were a local file system. In contrast, Google Cloud Storage provides RESTful APIs, which enables you to access the data programmatically over the internet.
Performance: Google Cloud Filestore is optimized for high performance, providing low latency and high throughput for file-based workloads. It is particularly well-suited for applications that require high-performance file storage, such as content management systems and media processing workflows. In contrast, Google Cloud Storage offers scalable and durable object storage, making it suitable for storing large amounts of unstructured data.
Cost Structure: The pricing model for Google Cloud Filestore is based on the amount of provisioned storage capacity and throughput you require. You pay for the resources you provision, regardless of the actual usage. On the other hand, Google Cloud Storage has a pay-as-you-go model, where you only pay for the actual storage consumed and data transfer.
Data Durability: Google Cloud Storage provides multiple layers of redundancy to ensure high durability and availability of your data. It stores multiple copies of your data across different locations, making it highly resilient to failures. While Google Cloud Filestore also provides redundancy within a single zone, it does not offer the same level of data durability as Google Cloud Storage.
Use Cases: Google Cloud Filestore is suitable for workloads that require shared file access, such as application development and data processing tasks. It is particularly well-suited for applications that require high-performance file storage, such as content management systems and media processing workflows. On the other hand, Google Cloud Storage is ideal for storing and serving static content, backing up data, and hosting websites.

Google Cloud Filestore vs Google Cloud Storage

Overview