StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Realtime Backend API
  5. Google Cloud Pub/Sub vs Horizon

Google Cloud Pub/Sub vs Horizon

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Horizon
Horizon
Stacks22
Followers56
Votes0
GitHub Stars6.8K
Forks348
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Stacks550
Followers428
Votes13

Google Cloud Pub/Sub vs Horizon: What are the differences?

<Google Cloud Pub/Sub and Horizon are two popular messaging services that offer different features and benefits. Below are key differences between Google Cloud Pub/Sub and Horizon.>

  1. Architecture: Google Cloud Pub/Sub is a fully-managed messaging service that allows you to send and receive messages between independent applications. On the other hand, Horizon is a real-time open-source backend framework that enables you to build and scale decentralized applications.

  2. Use Cases: Google Cloud Pub/Sub is ideal for building a range of applications such as data analysis, event-driven systems, and IoT device communication. In contrast, Horizon is specifically designed for building decentralized applications that require real-time updates and data synchronization across multiple nodes.

  3. Integration: Google Cloud Pub/Sub seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services like BigQuery, Dataflow, and Cloud Functions, making it easier to build complex data processing pipelines. Horizon, on the other hand, is more focused on integrating with blockchain technologies like Holochain and Holo, providing a decentralized data storage solution.

  4. Scalability: Google Cloud Pub/Sub offers high scalability, allowing you to handle millions of messages per second with automatic scaling based on your workload. Horizon also provides scalability through its sharding technique, enabling you to distribute data and computation across multiple nodes in a decentralized network.

  5. Pricing Model: Google Cloud Pub/Sub follows a pricing model based on the volume of messages published and subscribed, along with additional costs for data storage and network usage. Horizon, being open-source, offers a free and flexible pricing model, allowing you to run decentralized applications without incurring additional costs for message processing or storage.

  6. Management and Control: With Google Cloud Pub/Sub, you have full control over message routing, delivery, and acknowledgment through configurable settings and monitoring tools provided by Google Cloud Platform. Horizon, on the other hand, offers decentralized management and control, where data and application logic are distributed across nodes, ensuring greater resilience and fault tolerance in a decentralized environment.

In Summary, Google Cloud Pub/Sub is a managed messaging service best suited for traditional centralized applications, while Horizon is a decentralized backend framework designed for building applications on a distributed network.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Horizon
Horizon
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub

Horizon provides a complete backend that makes it dramatically simpler to build, deploy, manage, and scale engaging JavaScript web and mobile apps. Horizon is extensible, integrates with the Node.js stack, and allows building modern, arbitrarily complex applications.

Cloud Pub/Sub is a fully-managed real-time messaging service that allows you to send and receive messages between independent applications. You can leverage Cloud Pub/Sub’s flexibility to decouple systems and components hosted on Google Cloud Platform or elsewhere on the Internet.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
348
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
22
Stacks
550
Followers
56
Followers
428
Votes
0
Votes
13
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 9
    Easy to set-up and start with
  • 2
    Efficient and practical for complex systems
  • 2
    A great choice for microservice architecture
Cons
  • 2
    Need integration with stackdriver for monitoring
Integrations
RethinkDB
RethinkDB
GraphQL
GraphQL
JavaScript
JavaScript
Google Cloud Functions
Google Cloud Functions
Cloud Functions for Firebase
Cloud Functions for Firebase

What are some alternatives to Horizon, Google Cloud Pub/Sub?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase