StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Google Cloud Spanner vs HarperDB

Google Cloud Spanner vs HarperDB

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

HarperDB
HarperDB
Stacks6
Followers18
Votes9
Google Cloud Spanner
Google Cloud Spanner
Stacks57
Followers117
Votes3
GitHub Stars2.0K
Forks1.1K

Google Cloud Spanner vs HarperDB: What are the differences?

### Introduction
Google Cloud Spanner and HarperDB are both database management systems, but they have key differences that users should consider when choosing a solution.

1. **Data Model**: Google Cloud Spanner uses a relational data model, similar to traditional SQL databases, allowing users to define schemas and relationships between tables. On the other hand, HarperDB uses a NoSQL data model, which is more flexible and schema-less, making it easier to adapt to changing data requirements.
   
2. **Scaling**: Google Cloud Spanner is designed for horizontal scalability, allowing it to handle large amounts of data and high query volumes efficiently. HarperDB, on the other hand, offers vertical scalability, which may be more suitable for smaller or medium-sized applications that do not require as much scaling capacity.
   
3. **Consistency**: Google Cloud Spanner provides strong consistency guarantees, ensuring that data is always up-to-date and accurate across all nodes. HarperDB offers eventual consistency, which allows for faster performance but may result in temporary inconsistencies in data.
   
4. **Deployment**: Google Cloud Spanner is a fully managed service, meaning that Google handles the deployment, maintenance, and scaling of the database. HarperDB can be deployed on-premises, in the cloud, or in a hybrid environment, giving users more control over how and where the database is run.
   
5. **Transaction Support**: Google Cloud Spanner supports distributed transactions, allowing users to perform transactions across multiple regions without sacrificing consistency. HarperDB also supports transactions but may not have the same level of global consistency as Google Cloud Spanner.
   
6. **Cost**: Google Cloud Spanner can be more costly than HarperDB, especially for larger datasets or high-performance requirements, due to its horizontal scaling capabilities and fully managed service offering. HarperDB may be a more cost-effective option for users with smaller budgets or simpler database needs.

In Summary, Google Cloud Spanner and HarperDB differ in their data models, scaling capabilities, consistency guarantees, deployment options, transaction support, and overall cost implications. Users should consider these factors when choosing a database management system for their specific requirements. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

HarperDB
HarperDB
Google Cloud Spanner
Google Cloud Spanner

Harper takes the "stack" out of "tech stack" by combining data storage, caching, application, and messaging functions into a single technology to achieve unmatched global low latency, simplicity, and cost performance at scale.

It is a globally distributed database service that gives developers a production-ready storage solution. It provides key features such as global transactions, strongly consistent reads, and automatic multi-site replication and failover.

Cloud; Edge Computing; On Prem; Globally Distributed; Custom Functions; Database-as-a-service; Hybrid Cloud; Clustering and Replication; Fully-Indexed; Dynamic Schema; Small Footprint; SQL Query Engine; Full NoSQL Capabilities; Configurable Table-Level Pub/Sub; Built In API with Single End Point; Role Based Security; User Friendly Management Studio; Industry Standard Interfaces & Drivers;
Global transactions; Strongly consistent reads; Automatic multi-site replication; Failover.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
2.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
6
Stacks
57
Followers
18
Followers
117
Votes
9
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Data api
  • 1
    Flexibility
  • 1
    Distribution capabilities
  • 1
    Cost efficient
  • 1
    Edge capabilities
Pros
  • 1
    Scalable
  • 1
    Horizontal scaling
  • 1
    Strongly consistent
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
GraphQL
GraphQL
Docker
Docker
.NET
.NET
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
React.js Boilerplate
React.js Boilerplate
uWebSockets
uWebSockets
Python
Python
Rust
Rust
MySQL
MySQL
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MongoDB
MongoDB
SQLite
SQLite

What are some alternatives to HarperDB, Google Cloud Spanner?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase