StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Google Test vs Robot Framework

Google Test vs Robot Framework

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google Test
Google Test
Stacks16
Followers31
Votes0
GitHub Stars37.4K
Forks10.6K
Robot Framework
Robot Framework
Stacks344
Followers525
Votes120

Google Test vs Robot Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction

The following Markdown code provides a comparison between Google Test and Robot Framework.

  1. Test Framework Type: Google Test is primarily a unit testing framework that focuses on C++ code, while Robot Framework is a keyword-driven acceptance testing framework that supports multiple programming languages.
  2. Test Case Syntax: Google Test uses C++ based syntax for defining test cases and test fixtures, whereas Robot Framework uses a keyword-driven syntax with a mix of plain English and tabular expressions.
  3. Test Development Approach: Google Test follows a traditional approach, where test cases and test fixtures are written in code. On the other hand, Robot Framework promotes a more declarative approach, where test cases are written in plain English keyword format and can be developed by non-programmers as well.
  4. Test Execution Flexibility: Google Test requires the tests to be executed within a C++ environment, such as a compiler or an integrated development environment (IDE). Robot Framework, on the other hand, provides the flexibility to execute tests in multiple ways, including command-line execution, continuous integration servers, or even through its own IDE, RIDE.
  5. Built-in Libraries and Plugins: Google Test provides a set of C++ libraries and macros to assist in writing and executing tests. Robot Framework offers a wide range of built-in libraries and plugins for various purposes, including web testing, database testing, and REST API testing, among others.
  6. Community and Ecosystem: Google Test has a large and active community predominantly focused on C++ development, contributing to its continuous improvement and support. Robot Framework also has a vibrant community, but its ecosystem is more diverse due to support for multiple programming languages and the availability of numerous third-party libraries and plugins.

In Summary, Google Test is primarily a unit testing framework for C++ code, while Robot Framework is a keyword-driven acceptance testing framework supporting multiple programming languages, with a more declarative approach and a wider range of built-in libraries and plugins.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google Test
Google Test
Robot Framework
Robot Framework

It is a unit testing library for the C++ programming language, based on the xUnit architecture. The library is released under the BSD 3-clause license. It can be compiled for a variety of POSIX and Windows platforms, allowing unit-testing of C sources as well as C++ with minimal source modification.

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

An xUnit test framework; Test discovery; A rich set of assertions; User-defined assertions; Death tests; Fatal and non-fatal failures; Value-parameterized tests; Type-parameterized tests; Various options for running the tests; XML test report generation
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
37.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
10.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
16
Stacks
344
Followers
31
Followers
525
Votes
0
Votes
120
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 23
    Easy with CI/CD
  • 22
    Open Source
  • 21
    Simple Usage
  • 14
    Easily extendable
  • 13
    Vast Scope more than Front End
Cons
  • 8
    Nested Loops
  • 1
    Mostly for python
  • 1
    Devtooling is not there
  • 0
    Extensive library support
  • 0
    Mobile supports
Integrations
Linux
Linux
PlatformIO
PlatformIO
Windows
Windows
C++
C++
Mac OS X
Mac OS X
Cygwin
Cygwin
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Google Test, Robot Framework?

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana