StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. Gradle vs Webpack

Gradle vs Webpack

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gradle
Gradle
Stacks24.3K
Followers9.8K
Votes254
GitHub Stars18.1K
Forks5.0K
Webpack
Webpack
Stacks45.0K
Followers28.1K
Votes752
GitHub Stars65.7K
Forks9.2K

Gradle vs Webpack: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Gradle and Webpack, which are popular build automation tools for web development projects.

  1. Configurability: Gradle is a highly configurable build system that uses Groovy or Kotlin as its scripting language. It offers a wide range of plugins and allows developers to customize their build process according to specific project requirements. On the other hand, Webpack is a module bundler primarily designed for JavaScript applications. It provides a simpler configuration using a JavaScript configuration file, making it easier for developers to set up their projects.

  2. Dependency Management: Gradle has its own dependency management system, which allows developers to easily manage and download external libraries and frameworks required for their project. It can fetch dependencies from remote repositories or local directories. Webpack, on the other hand, relies on npm (Node Package Manager) for dependency management. It uses npm's package.json file to specify and manage project dependencies.

  3. Build Performance: Gradle is known for its efficient incremental build capability, which allows it to smartly identify and only rebuild the necessary parts of a project, saving time and resources. It uses a sophisticated dependency graph to determine the tasks that need to be executed. Webpack, on the other hand, focuses on optimizing the bundle size and loading speed of JavaScript applications. It uses features like code splitting and lazy loading to improve performance.

  4. Language Support: Gradle can be used with projects written in various programming languages, including Java, Kotlin, Groovy, and more. It provides a unified build system for multi-language projects. In contrast, Webpack is primarily focused on JavaScript applications, although it can also handle assets like CSS and images. It is tightly integrated with the JavaScript ecosystem, enabling developers to leverage popular frameworks like React or Vue.js.

  5. Code Splitting: Code splitting is a technique to split the JavaScript code into smaller chunks, which can be loaded on-demand when required. Gradle does not natively support code splitting and requires additional configuration or plugins to achieve it. Webpack, on the other hand, has built-in support for code splitting. It can analyze the dependencies between different modules and generate separate bundles, improving initial loading speed and reducing bundle sizes.

  6. Hot Module Replacement: Hot module replacement (HMR) is a valuable feature for frontend developers as it allows changes in the code to be immediately reflected in the browser without the need for a full page reload. Gradle does not have native support for HMR, but it can be achieved by integrating with other tools or frameworks like webpack-dev-server. Webpack, on the other hand, natively supports HMR, making it easier to develop and test frontend code more efficiently.

In summary, Gradle is a highly configurable build automation tool with support for multiple programming languages, efficient incremental build capabilities, and a powerful dependency management system. Webpack, on the other hand, is focused on optimizing JavaScript applications, providing code splitting, built-in HMR, and simplified configuration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Gradle, Webpack

Aleksandr
Aleksandr

Contract Software Engineer - Microsoft at Microsoft-365

Dec 23, 2019

Decided

Why migrated?

I could define the next points why we have to migrate:

  • Decrease build time of our application. (It was the main cause).
  • Also jspm install takes much more time than npm install.
  • Many config files for SystemJS and JSPM. For Webpack you can use just one main config file, and you can use some separate config files for specific builds using inheritance and merge them.
301k views301k
Comments
Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.

224k views224k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Gradle
Gradle
Webpack
Webpack

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Declarative builds and build-by-convention;Language for dependency based programming;Structure your build;Deep API;Gradle scales;Multi-project builds;Many ways to manage your dependencies;Gradle is the first build integration tool
Bundles ES Modules, CommonJS, and AMD modules (even combined); Can create a single bundle or multiple chunks that are asynchronously loaded at runtime (to reduce initial loading time); Dependencies are resolved during compilation, reducing the runtime size; Loaders can preprocess files while compiling, e.g. TypeScript to JavaScript, Handlebars strings to compiled functions, images to Base64, etc; Highly modular plugin system to do whatever else your application requires
Statistics
GitHub Stars
18.1K
GitHub Stars
65.7K
GitHub Forks
5.0K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
Stacks
24.3K
Stacks
45.0K
Followers
9.8K
Followers
28.1K
Votes
254
Votes
752
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 110
    Flexibility
  • 51
    Easy to use
  • 47
    Groovy dsl
  • 22
    Slow build time
  • 10
    Crazy memory leaks
Cons
  • 8
    Inactionnable documentation
  • 6
    It is just the mess of Ant++
  • 4
    Hard to decide: ten or more ways to achieve one goal
  • 2
    Dependency on groovy
  • 2
    Bad Eclipse tooling
Pros
  • 309
    Most powerful bundler
  • 182
    Built-in dev server with livereload
  • 142
    Can handle all types of assets
  • 87
    Easy configuration
  • 22
    Laravel-mix
Cons
  • 15
    Hard to configure
  • 5
    No clear direction
  • 2
    SystemJS integration is quite lackluster
  • 2
    Fire and Forget mentality of Core-Developers
  • 2
    Loader architecture is quite a mess (unreliable/buggy)
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Gradle, Webpack?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Apache Maven

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Pants

Pants

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Backpack

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

Vite

Vite

It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana