StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. Gradle vs Yarn

Gradle vs Yarn

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gradle
Gradle
Stacks24.3K
Followers9.8K
Votes254
GitHub Stars18.1K
Forks5.0K
Yarn
Yarn
Stacks28.2K
Followers13.5K
Votes151
GitHub Stars41.5K
Forks2.7K

Gradle vs Yarn: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Gradle and Yarn

1. Scalability: Gradle is a build automation tool that provides scalability and flexibility in managing complex projects. It allows developers to define custom build logic using a powerful Groovy-based DSL, making it suitable for large and diverse software projects. On the other hand, Yarn is a package manager for JavaScript that focuses on dependency management in Node.js projects. It optimizes dependency resolution and install efficiency, making it ideal for managing the packages and dependencies in a Node.js application.

2. Language Support: Gradle supports a wide range of programming languages, including Java, C++, Kotlin, Groovy, and more. It can be used for building projects and managing dependencies in different languages, making it a versatile choice for multi-language projects. Yarn, on the other hand, is specifically designed for JavaScript projects, and it excels in managing npm packages and their dependencies in Node.js applications.

3. Build Configuration: Gradle uses a declarative approach for build configuration, allowing developers to define the build process and dependencies in a centralized build script. It provides a flexible and customizable way to define tasks, dependencies, and build logic. Yarn, on the other hand, uses a simple and intuitive configuration file called package.json to specify the project's dependencies and scripts. It follows a more straightforward approach compared to Gradle's declarative build configuration.

4. Performance: Gradle offers a highly optimized build process that can handle complex projects efficiently. It uses an incremental build architecture to minimize the build time by only executing necessary tasks. Additionally, it provides dependency caching and parallel execution capabilities for faster builds. Yarn focuses more on the performance of dependency resolution and installation. It has algorithms that optimize the dependency graph for faster resolution and parallelism for concurrent package installations.

5. Ecosystem Integration: Gradle integrates well with various development tools and frameworks, allowing developers to leverage the ecosystem around them. It provides seamless integration with IDEs, CI/CD systems, and other build-related plugins and extensions. Yarn, being focused on Node.js projects, has excellent integration with the JavaScript ecosystem. It can make use of the numerous npm packages available and works well with tools like webpack, Babel, and Jest.

6. Community and Support: Gradle has a large and active community with extensive documentation and support resources. It is backed by Gradle Inc., which provides commercial support and consulting services. Yarn, being part of the JavaScript and Node.js ecosystem, also has a vibrant community and ample online resources. It benefits from the popularity and widespread usage of JavaScript, making it easy to find support and solutions to common issues.

In summary, Gradle and Yarn differ in their scalability, language support, build configuration approach, performance optimizations, ecosystem integration, and availability of community support. Gradle is suitable for multi-language projects with complex build requirements, while Yarn is a specialized tool for managing JavaScript dependencies in Node.js applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Gradle, Yarn

StackShare
StackShare

Apr 23, 2019

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsnpmnpmYarnYarn

From a StackShare Community member: “I’m a freelance web developer (I mostly use Node.js) and for future projects I’m debating between npm or Yarn as my default package manager. I’m a minimalist so I hate installing software if I don’t need to- in this case that would be Yarn. For those who made the switch from npm to Yarn, what benefits have you noticed? For those who stuck with npm, are you happy you with it?"

294k views294k
Comments
zen-li
zen-li

Apr 24, 2019

ReviewonYarnYarn

p.s.

I am not sure about the performance of the latest version of npm, whether it is different from my understanding of it below. Because I use npm very rarely when I had the following knowledge.

------⏬

I use Yarn because, first, yarn is the first tool to lock the version. Second, although npm also supports the lock version, when you use npm to lock the version, and then use package-lock.json on other systems, package-lock.json Will be modified. You understand what I mean, when you deploy projects based on Git...

250k views250k
Comments
Oleksandr
Oleksandr

Senior Software Engineer at joyn

Dec 7, 2019

Decided

As we have to build the application for many different TV platforms we want to split the application logic from the device/platform specific code. Previously we had different repositories and it was very hard to keep the development process when changes were done in multiple repositories, as we had to synchronize code reviews as well as merging and then updating the dependencies of projects. This issues would be even more critical when building the project from scratch what we did at Joyn. Therefor to keep all code in one place, at the same time keeping in separated in different modules we decided to give a try to monorepo. First we tried out lerna which was fine at the beginning, but later along the way we had issues with adding new dependencies which came out of the blue and were not easy to fix. Next round of evolution was yarn workspaces, we are still using it and are pretty happy with dev experience it provides. And one more advantage we got when switched to yarn workspaces that we also switched from npm to yarn what improved the state of the lock file a lot, because with npm package-lock file was updated every time you run npm install, frequent updates of package-lock file were causing very often merge conflicts. So right now we not just having faster dependencies installation time but also no conflicts coming from lock file.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Gradle
Gradle
Yarn
Yarn

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

Declarative builds and build-by-convention;Language for dependency based programming;Structure your build;Deep API;Gradle scales;Multi-project builds;Many ways to manage your dependencies;Gradle is the first build integration tool
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
18.1K
GitHub Stars
41.5K
GitHub Forks
5.0K
GitHub Forks
2.7K
Stacks
24.3K
Stacks
28.2K
Followers
9.8K
Followers
13.5K
Votes
254
Votes
151
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 110
    Flexibility
  • 51
    Easy to use
  • 47
    Groovy dsl
  • 22
    Slow build time
  • 10
    Crazy memory leaks
Cons
  • 8
    Inactionnable documentation
  • 6
    It is just the mess of Ant++
  • 4
    Hard to decide: ten or more ways to achieve one goal
  • 2
    Dependency on groovy
  • 2
    Bad Eclipse tooling
Pros
  • 85
    Incredibly fast
  • 22
    Easy to use
  • 13
    Open Source
  • 11
    Can install any npm package
  • 8
    Works where npm fails
Cons
  • 16
    Facebook
  • 7
    Sends data to facebook
  • 4
    Should be installed separately
  • 3
    Cannot publish to registry other than npm
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript
npm
npm

What are some alternatives to Gradle, Yarn?

npm

npm

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

Apache Maven

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

RequireJS

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Pants

Pants

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

Component

Component

Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app.

JitPack

JitPack

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

SBT

SBT

It is similar to Java's Maven and Ant. Its main features are: Native support for compiling Scala code and integrating with many Scala test frameworks.

Buck

Buck

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana