StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Image Optimization
  4. Image Processing And Management
  5. GraphicsMagick vs OpenCV vs scikit-image

GraphicsMagick vs OpenCV vs scikit-image

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenCV
OpenCV
Stacks1.4K
Followers1.1K
Votes102
scikit-image
scikit-image
Stacks311
Followers129
Votes12
GitHub Stars6.4K
Forks2.3K
GraphicsMagick
GraphicsMagick
Stacks25
Followers65
Votes4

GraphicsMagick vs OpenCV vs scikit-image: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Key differences between GraphicsMagick, OpenCV, and scikit-image are outlined below:

1. **Purpose and Features**: GraphicsMagick focuses on image manipulation and conversion tasks with a command-line interface, while OpenCV offers a wide range of computer vision functionalities for image and video processing. On the other hand, scikit-image provides a collection of algorithms for image processing and analysis in Python.

2. **Language Support**: GraphicsMagick and scikit-image are primarily focused on Python programming language, whereas OpenCV supports multiple languages including C++, Python, and Java. This can be a crucial factor depending on the preferred language for development.

3. **Community and Documentation**: OpenCV has a large and active community with extensive documentation and resources available online, making it easier for developers to find solutions to their problems. GraphicsMagick and scikit-image also have good community support but may not be as vast as OpenCV.

4. **Performance and Speed**: OpenCV is known for its optimized algorithms and performance, making it a preferred choice for real-time applications and high-performance computing. GraphicsMagick and scikit-image may not offer the same level of optimization in terms of performance and speed.

5. **Integration and Compatibility**: OpenCV provides seamless integration with other libraries and frameworks, making it versatile for various projects. GraphicsMagick and scikit-image also offer compatibility with different environments but may require additional tools or plugins for integration with certain systems.

6. **Learning Curve**: OpenCV, with its comprehensive functionalities and complex algorithms, may have a steeper learning curve compared to GraphicsMagick and scikit-image, which offer simpler interfaces and concepts for image processing tasks.

In Summary, the key differences between GraphicsMagick, OpenCV, and scikit-image lie in their purpose, language support, community support, performance, integration, and learning curve for developers. Each library has its strengths and weaknesses, catering to different needs in image processing and computer vision applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenCV
OpenCV
scikit-image
scikit-image
GraphicsMagick
GraphicsMagick

OpenCV was designed for computational efficiency and with a strong focus on real-time applications. Written in optimized C/C++, the library can take advantage of multi-core processing. Enabled with OpenCL, it can take advantage of the hardware acceleration of the underlying heterogeneous compute platform.

scikit-image is a collection of algorithms for image processing.

GraphicsMagick is the swiss army knife of image processing. Comprised of 267K physical lines (according to David A. Wheeler's SLOCCount) of source code in the base package (or 1,225K including 3rd party libraries) it provides a robust and efficient collection of tools and libraries which support reading, writing, and manipulating an image in over 88 major formats including important formats like DPX, GIF, JPEG, JPEG-2000, PNG, PDF, PNM, and TIFF.

C++, C, Python and Java interfaces and supports Windows, Linux, Mac OS, iOS and Android;More than 47 thousand people of user community and estimated number of downloads exceeding 7 million;Usage ranges from interactive art, to mines inspection, stitching maps on the web or through advanced robotics
Provides I/O, filtering, morphology, transformations, measurement, annotation, color conversions, test data sets, etc.;Written in Python with a well-commented source code;Has had 5,709 commits made by 116 contributors representing 29,953 lines of code;Released under BSD-3-Clause license
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
6.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
311
Stacks
25
Followers
1.1K
Followers
129
Followers
65
Votes
102
Votes
12
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 37
    Computer Vision
  • 18
    Open Source
  • 12
    Imaging
  • 10
    Face Detection
  • 10
    Machine Learning
Pros
  • 6
    More powerful
  • 4
    Anaconda compatibility
  • 2
    Great documentation
Pros
  • 4
    Used by flickr and etsy

What are some alternatives to OpenCV, scikit-image, GraphicsMagick?

Cloudinary

Cloudinary

Cloudinary is a cloud-based service that streamlines websites and mobile applications' entire image and video management needs - uploads, storage, administration, manipulations, and delivery.

imgix

imgix

imgix is the leading platform for end-to-end visual media processing. With robust APIs, SDKs, and integrations, imgix empowers developers to optimize, transform, manage, and deliver images and videos at scale through simple URL parameters.

ImageKit

ImageKit

ImageKit offers a real-time URL-based API for image & video optimization, streaming, and 50+ transformations to deliver perfect visual experiences on websites and apps. It also comes integrated with a Digital Asset Management solution.

Cloudimage

Cloudimage

Effortless image resizing, optimization and CDN delivery. Make your site fully responsive and really fast.

Kraken.io

Kraken.io

It supports JPEG, PNG and GIF files. You can optimize your images in two ways - by providing an URL of the image you want to optimize or by uploading an image file directly to its API.

ImageEngine

ImageEngine

ImageEngine is an intelligent Image CDN that dynamically optimizes image content tailored to the end users device. Using device intelligence at the CDN edge, developers can greatly simplify their image management process while accelerating their site.

FFMPEG

FFMPEG

The universal multimedia toolkit.

GStreamer

GStreamer

It is a library for constructing graphs of media-handling components. The applications it supports range from simple Ogg/Vorbis playback, audio/video streaming to complex audio (mixing) and video (non-linear editing) processing.

Piio

Piio

Piio, Inc. offers a superior set of products with the most advanced technology for image optimization and web performance. Piio is helping over 5000 companies and developers and delivering billions of images to users around the globe.

ImageBoss

ImageBoss

Content aware image resizing, cropping, compression, cache and globally deliver. All web development best practices, hassle free in one simple and powerful API.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase