StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Companies
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

API StatusChangelog
imgix
Byimgiximgix

imgix

#6in Image Optimization
Stacks217Discussions3
Followers322
OverviewDiscussions3

What is imgix?

imgix is the leading platform for end-to-end visual media processing. With robust APIs, SDKs, and integrations, imgix empowers developers to optimize, transform, manage, and deliver images and videos at scale through simple URL parameters.

imgix is a tool in the Image Optimization category of a tech stack.

Key Features

Image API - Resize, crop, and composite multiple images by changing their URLs. Change output formats, device-pixel ratios, and chroma subsampling rates.Responsive Images - Integrate imgix into the latest imaging standards without reprocessing your entire image library.Video API - process, optimize, and deliver your streaming videos.Asset Manager - Search, visualize, browse, and organize any assets in your cloud storage bucket.Image Editing - Make simple edits (focalpoint crop, width/height adjustments, format changes) directly in Asset Manager and easily download or copy a link to a modified image.Deliver - Leverage the imgix global CDN with more than 20 POPs worldwide.

imgix Pros & Cons

Pros of imgix

  • ✓Image processing on demand
  • ✓Easy setup
  • ✓Reduce Development Costs
  • ✓Smart Cropping
  • ✓Efficient
  • ✓Insanely Fast
  • ✓Filters, resizing, blur and more as url parameters
  • ✓Easy to understand pricing
  • ✓Professional Features and Options
  • ✓Excellent Face Detection

Cons of imgix

No cons listed yet.

imgix Alternatives & Comparisons

What are some alternatives to imgix?

OpenCV

OpenCV

OpenCV was designed for computational efficiency and with a strong focus on real-time applications. Written in optimized C/C++, the library can take advantage of multi-core processing. Enabled with OpenCL, it can take advantage of the hardware acceleration of the underlying heterogeneous compute platform.

Cloudinary

Cloudinary

Cloudinary is a cloud-based service that streamlines websites and mobile applications' entire image and video management needs - uploads, storage, administration, manipulations, and delivery.

Pillow

Pillow

It adds image processing capabilities to your Python interpreter. It provides extensive file format support, an efficient internal representation, and fairly powerful image processing capabilities.

FFMPEG

FFMPEG

The universal multimedia toolkit.

scikit-image

scikit-image

scikit-image is a collection of algorithms for image processing.

ImageMagick

ImageMagick

It is a free and open-source software suite for displaying, converting, and editing raster image and vector image files. It can read and write images in a variety of formats (over 200) including PNG, JPEG, GIF, HEIC, TIFF, DPX, EXR, WebP, Postscript, PDF, and SVG.

imgix Integrations

Twill, Contentful, AngularJS, WordPress, Amazon S3 and 7 more are some of the popular tools that integrate with imgix. Here's a list of all 12 tools that integrate with imgix.

Twill
Twill
Contentful
Contentful
AngularJS
AngularJS
WordPress
WordPress
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Rails
Rails
Objective-C
Objective-C
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Magento
Magento
Gatsby
Gatsby
JavaScript
JavaScript
Drift
Drift

imgix Discussions

Discover why developers choose imgix. Read real-world technical decisions and stack choices from the StackShare community.Showing 3 of 4 discussions.

Mountain/ \Ash
Mountain/ \Ash

Web Developer at Washington Brown

Jul 15, 2019

Needs adviceonKeyCDNKeyCDNPingdomPingdomCloudFlareCloudFlare

Platform Update: we’ve been using the Performance Test tool provided by KeyCDN for a long time in combination with Pingdom's similar tool and the #WebpageTest and #GoogleInsight - we decided to test out KeyCDN for static asset hosting. The results for the endpoints were superfast - almost 200% faster than CloudFlare in some tests and 370% faster than imgix . So we’ve moved Washington Brown from imgix for hosting theme images, to KeyCDN for hosting all images and static assets (Font, CSS & JS). There’s a few things that we like about “Key” apart from saving $6 a month on the monthly minimum spend ($4 vs $10 for imgix). Key allow for a custom CNAME (no more advertising imgix.com in domain requests and possible SEO improvements - and easier to swap to another host down the track). Key allows JPEG/WebP image requests based on clients ‘accept’ http headers - imgix required a ?auto=format query string on each image resource request - which can break some caches. Key allows for explicitly denying cookies to be set on a zone/domain; cookies are a big strain on limited upload bandwidth so to be able to force these off is great - Cloudflare adds a cookie to every header… for “performance reasons”… but remember “if you’re getting a product something for free…”

0 views0
Comments
Mountain/ \Ash
Mountain/ \Ash

Web Developer at Washington Brown

Mar 18, 2019

Needs adviceonCloudFlareCloudFlareDigitalOceanDigitalOceanimgiximgix

In mid-2018 we made a big push for speed on the site. The site, running on PHP, was taking about 7 seconds to load. The site had already been running through CloudFlare for some time but on a shared host in Sydney (which is also where most of the customers are). We found when developing the @TuffTruck site that DigitalOcean was fast - and even though it's located overseas, we still found it 2 seconds faster for Australian users. We found that some Wordpress plugins were really slowing the TTFB - with all plugins off, Wordpress would save respond 1.5-2 seconds faster. With a on/off step through of each plugin we found 2 plugins by Ontraport (a CRM type service that some forms we populating) was the main culprit. Out it went and we built our own WP plugin to do push the data to Ontraport only when required. With the TTFB acceptable, we moved on to getting the completed page load time down. Turning on CloudFlare 's HTML/CSS/JS minifications & Rocket Loader we could get our group of test pages, including the homepage, loading [in full] in just over 2 seconds. We then moved images off to imgix and put the CSS, JS and Fonts onto a mirrored subdomain (so that cookies weren't exchanged), but this only shaved about another 0.2 seconds off. We are keeping it running for the moment, but the $10 minimum a month for imgix is hardly worth it (this would be change if new images were going up all the time and needed processing). The client is overly happy with the ~70% improvement and has already seen the site move up the ranks of Google's SERP and bring down their PPC costs. AND all the new hosting providers still come in at half the price of the previous Sydney hosting service. We have a few ideas that we are testing on our staging site and will roll these out soon.

0 views0
Comments
Mountain/ \Ash
Mountain/ \Ash

Web Developer

Mar 18, 2019

Needs adviceonCloudFlareCloudFlareDigitalOceanDigitalOceanimgiximgix

In mid-2018 we made a big push for speed on the site. The site, running on PHP, was taking about 7 seconds to load. The site had already been running through CloudFlare for some time but on a shared host in Sydney (which is also where most of the customers are). We found when developing the @TuffTruck site that DigitalOcean was fast - and even though it's located overseas, we still found it 2 seconds faster for Australian users. We found that some Wordpress plugins were really slowing the TTFB - with all plugins off, Wordpress would save respond 1.5-2 seconds faster. With a on/off walk through of each plugin we found 2 plugins by Ontraport (a CRM type service that some forms we populating) was the main culprit. Out they went and we built our own plugin to do push the data to them only when required. With the TTFB acceptable, we moved on to getting the complete page load time down. Turning on CloudFlare 's HTML/CSS/JS minifications & Rocket Loader we could get our group of test pages, including the homepage, loading [in full] in just over 2 seconds. We then moved the images off to imgix and put the CSS, JS and Fonts onto a mirrored subdomain (so that cookies weren't exchanged), but this only shaved about another 0.2 seconds off. We are keeping it running for the moment, but the $10 minimum a month for imgix is hardly worth it (would be different if new images were going up all the time and needed processing). The client is overly happy with the ~70% improvement and has already seen the site move up the ranks of Google's SERP and bring down their PPC costs. AND all the new hosting providers still come in at half the price of the previous Sydney hosting service. We have a few ideas that we are testing on our staging site and will roll these out soon.

0 views0
Comments
View all 4 discussions

Try It

Visit Website

Adoption

On StackShare

Companies
104
CDEHIP+98
Developers
112
NJMAMS+106