StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Image Optimization
  4. Image Processing And Management
  5. Cloudinary vs imgix

Cloudinary vs imgix

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

imgix
imgix
Stacks214
Followers322
Votes177
Cloudinary
Cloudinary
Stacks634
Followers594
Votes179

Cloudinary vs imgix: What are the differences?

Introduction: Cloudinary and imgix are both image and video management platforms that offer similar functionalities, but they have some key differences. In this analysis, we will highlight and discuss the most significant disparities between these two platforms.

  1. Data Storage Location: One key difference between Cloudinary and imgix is where they store your media assets. Cloudinary uses its own cloud storage for data storage, which means that when you upload an image or video to Cloudinary, it is stored in their servers. On the other hand, imgix does not offer any storage capabilities. Instead, imgix integrates with various cloud storage providers such as Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, or your own origin server. This difference in data storage location can have implications for data privacy, accessibility, and control.

  2. Image Manipulation: Both Cloudinary and imgix allow you to dynamically manipulate images and videos, but they have different approaches to achieving this. Cloudinary uses a URL-based approach, where you pass parameters in the URL to apply transformations to your media. In contrast, imgix uses a query string-based approach, where you append query parameters to the image or video URL for transformations. This difference in syntax and implementation can affect how you integrate and work with the platforms.

  3. Transformation Features: While both Cloudinary and imgix offer extensive transformation features, there are some differences in the specific capabilities they provide. Cloudinary has a wide range of image and video manipulation options, including resizing, cropping, rotating, adding text overlays, applying filters, and more. imgix also offers a comprehensive set of transformations, but it has a stronger focus on delivering images at optimal quality and performance. imgix provides advanced features like automatic quality adjustment, intelligent cropping, and real-time image optimization.

  4. Pricing Structure: Another noticeable difference between Cloudinary and imgix is their pricing structure. Cloudinary offers various pricing plans based on dimensions, bandwidth, storage, and features, allowing you to choose the most suitable plan for your specific needs. imgix, on the other hand, has a different pricing approach where they charge based on the number of images requested and the total bandwidth consumed. This difference in pricing models can impact the cost-effectiveness of using either platform, depending on your usage patterns.

  5. API and SDK Integrations: Both Cloudinary and imgix provide APIs and SDKs for easy integration into different platforms and frameworks. However, there might be variations in terms of language support or available features. It is advisable to check the documentation and developer resources provided by each platform to ensure they align with your specific requirements and development stack.

  6. Platform Ecosystem: Cloudinary and imgix have developed their own ecosystems and partnerships to provide additional value to their customers. Cloudinary has a broader ecosystem with integrations with various content management systems (CMS), e-commerce platforms, social media networks, and other third-party services. imgix has also built integrations and partnerships, but their ecosystem might be more focused on specific industries or use cases. It is important to evaluate the platform's ecosystem and integrations to ensure they align with your existing technology stack and requirements.

In summary, Cloudinary and imgix differ in their data storage location, image manipulation approaches, transformation features, pricing structure, API integrations, and platform ecosystems. These differences have implications for data privacy, product usability, cost-effectiveness, and integration possibilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

imgix
imgix
Cloudinary
Cloudinary

imgix is the leading platform for end-to-end visual media processing. With robust APIs, SDKs, and integrations, imgix empowers developers to optimize, transform, manage, and deliver images and videos at scale through simple URL parameters.

Cloudinary is a cloud-based service that streamlines websites and mobile applications' entire image and video management needs - uploads, storage, administration, manipulations, and delivery.

Image API - Resize, crop, and composite multiple images by changing their URLs. Change output formats, device-pixel ratios, and chroma subsampling rates.; Responsive Images - Integrate imgix into the latest imaging standards without reprocessing your entire image library.; Video API - process, optimize, and deliver your streaming videos.; Asset Manager - Search, visualize, browse, and organize any assets in your cloud storage bucket.; Image Editing - Make simple edits (focalpoint crop, width/height adjustments, format changes) directly in Asset Manager and easily download or copy a link to a modified image.; Deliver - Leverage the imgix global CDN with more than 20 POPs worldwide.;
Upload images to a cloud-based storage; Upload video to cloud-based storage; Automatic backup and revision tracking; Many image manipulation capabilities & effects; Smart resizing & face detection based thumbnails; Handling PDFs, sprites, watermarks, social profile pictures; Fast CDN delivery with advanced caching; Automatic image optimization; Powerful dashboard, media library and reports; RESTful APIs, intuitive URL based transformations; Image metadata and semantic data extraction; Integration SDKs for web & mobile frameworks; Custom domain (CNAME) support; Authenticated URLs; On-the-fly Video transcoding ; On-the-fly Video overlays;
Statistics
Stacks
214
Stacks
634
Followers
322
Followers
594
Votes
177
Votes
179
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 28
    Image processing on demand
  • 24
    Easy setup
  • 18
    Smart Cropping
  • 18
    Reduce Development Costs
  • 15
    Efficient
Pros
  • 37
    Easy setup
  • 31
    Fast image delivery
  • 26
    Vast array of image manipulation capabilities
  • 21
    Free tier
  • 11
    Heroku add-on
Cons
  • 5
    Paid plan is expensive
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
WordPress
WordPress
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Rails
Rails
Objective-C
Objective-C
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Magento
Magento
Gatsby
Gatsby
JavaScript
JavaScript
Drift
Drift
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
AppHarbor
AppHarbor
Heroku
Heroku
Node.js
Node.js
Django
Django
WordPress
WordPress
Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Ruby
Ruby
Python
Python
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to imgix, Cloudinary?

OpenCV

OpenCV

OpenCV was designed for computational efficiency and with a strong focus on real-time applications. Written in optimized C/C++, the library can take advantage of multi-core processing. Enabled with OpenCL, it can take advantage of the hardware acceleration of the underlying heterogeneous compute platform.

ImageKit

ImageKit

ImageKit offers a real-time URL-based API for image & video optimization, streaming, and 50+ transformations to deliver perfect visual experiences on websites and apps. It also comes integrated with a Digital Asset Management solution.

Cloudimage

Cloudimage

Effortless image resizing, optimization and CDN delivery. Make your site fully responsive and really fast.

scikit-image

scikit-image

scikit-image is a collection of algorithms for image processing.

Kraken.io

Kraken.io

It supports JPEG, PNG and GIF files. You can optimize your images in two ways - by providing an URL of the image you want to optimize or by uploading an image file directly to its API.

ImageEngine

ImageEngine

ImageEngine is an intelligent Image CDN that dynamically optimizes image content tailored to the end users device. Using device intelligence at the CDN edge, developers can greatly simplify their image management process while accelerating their site.

FFMPEG

FFMPEG

The universal multimedia toolkit.

GStreamer

GStreamer

It is a library for constructing graphs of media-handling components. The applications it supports range from simple Ogg/Vorbis playback, audio/video streaming to complex audio (mixing) and video (non-linear editing) processing.

GraphicsMagick

GraphicsMagick

GraphicsMagick is the swiss army knife of image processing. Comprised of 267K physical lines (according to David A. Wheeler's SLOCCount) of source code in the base package (or 1,225K including 3rd party libraries) it provides a robust and efficient collection of tools and libraries which support reading, writing, and manipulating an image in over 88 major formats including important formats like DPX, GIF, JPEG, JPEG-2000, PNG, PDF, PNM, and TIFF.

Piio

Piio

Piio, Inc. offers a superior set of products with the most advanced technology for image optimization and web performance. Piio is helping over 5000 companies and developers and delivering billions of images to users around the globe.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase