Alternatives to Cloudinary logo

Alternatives to Cloudinary

Bytescale, CloudFlare, imgix, Akamai, and Amazon S3 are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Cloudinary.
594
594
+ 1
179

What is Cloudinary and what are its top alternatives?

Cloudinary is a popular cloud-based media management solution that allows users to upload, store, manage, optimize, and deliver images and videos for web and mobile applications. Its key features include automatic image optimizations, dynamic image resizing, file format conversions, video transcoding, and AI-powered content-aware cropping. However, Cloudinary can be costly for high volumes of media storage and bandwidth usage.

  1. Imgix: Imgix is an image processing and delivery platform that enables users to optimize images for fast loading on websites and apps. Key features include real-time image processing, dynamic image resizing, and responsive images. Pros: High-performance optimization and flexible pricing. Cons: Limited video support compared to Cloudinary.
  2. Kraken.io: Kraken.io is a robust image optimization tool that helps users reduce image file sizes without compromising quality. It offers features like lossless and lossy compression, webP support, and API integration. Pros: Excellent image compression results. Cons: Limited video processing capabilities.
  3. Cloudimage: Cloudimage is a cloud-based image management solution that provides features such as on-the-fly image resizing, lazy loading, and automatic format conversion. Pros: Easy integration and responsive images. Cons: May lack some advanced image manipulation features compared to Cloudinary.
  4. Sirv: Sirv is an image optimization and delivery platform that offers features like automatic resizing, responsive images, and lazy loading. Pros: Robust image optimization and real-time image processing. Cons: Pricing may not be as competitive as other alternatives.
  5. Fastly Image Optimizer: Fastly Image Optimizer is a powerful tool for optimizing images at the edge, reducing load times and improving website performance. Key features include automatic format conversion, lazy loading, and advanced caching options. Pros: Edge-based optimization for faster delivery. Cons: Limited support for video processing.
  6. Uploadcare: Uploadcare is a file handling solution that offers image and video processing capabilities, including automatic image resizing, video transcoding, and CDN delivery. Pros: Easy to use and scalable solution for handling media files. Cons: May not have as many advanced image editing features as Cloudinary.
  7. Imagify: Imagify is a WordPress plugin that provides image optimization features like compression, resizing, and conversion to WebP format. Pros: Seamless integration with WordPress websites. Cons: Limited customization and control over image optimization compared to Cloudinary.
  8. Piio: Piio is an image optimization tool that uses AI to deliver the right image size for each user, improving website loading times. Key features include automatic resizing, lazy loading, and image lazy loading. Pros: AI-powered image optimization for better performance. Cons: May lack some advanced image editing features.
  9. Optimole: Optimole is a WordPress plugin for image optimization that dynamically resizes and compresses images to improve website speed. Pros: Easy setup and automatic optimization. Cons: Limited customization options for image processing compared to Cloudinary.
  10. TinyIMG: TinyIMG is a Shopify app that helps users optimize their images for faster loading times on e-commerce websites. Features include bulk image optimization, lazy loading, and automatic size recommendations. Pros: Tailored for Shopify stores and seamless integration. Cons: Limited support for video processing.

Top Alternatives to Cloudinary

  • Bytescale
    Bytescale

    Bytescale is the best way to serve images, videos, and audio for web apps. Includes: Fast CDN, Storage, and Media Processing APIs. ...

  • CloudFlare
    CloudFlare

    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...

  • imgix
    imgix

    imgix is the leading platform for end-to-end visual media processing. With robust APIs, SDKs, and integrations, imgix empowers developers to optimize, transform, manage, and deliver images and videos at scale through simple URL parameters. ...

  • Akamai
    Akamai

    If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward. ...

  • Amazon S3
    Amazon S3

    Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web ...

  • Firebase
    Firebase

    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds. ...

  • Filestack
    Filestack

    Filepicker helps developers connect to their users' content. Connect, Store, and Process any file from anywhere on the Internet. ...

  • Uploadcare
    Uploadcare

    Uploadcare is file management platform and a CDN for user-generated content. It is a robust file API for uploading, managing, processing, rendering, optimizing, and delivering users’ content. ...

Cloudinary alternatives & related posts

Bytescale logo

Bytescale

10
19
21
The Developer Platform for Images, Videos & Audio.
10
19
+ 1
21
PROS OF BYTESCALE
  • 3
    Lightweight JS SDK
  • 3
    Easy setup
  • 3
    CDN Included
  • 2
    Cost effective
  • 2
    Serverless
  • 2
    No branding
  • 2
    Quick support
  • 1
    Transformations Included
  • 1
    Modern dashboard
  • 1
    Custom file transformations
  • 1
    Very affordable
  • 0
    Lightweight JS Widget
  • 0
    Quick support over Slack
CONS OF BYTESCALE
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Bytescale posts

    CloudFlare logo

    CloudFlare

    76.2K
    22.2K
    1.8K
    The Web Performance & Security Company.
    76.2K
    22.2K
    + 1
    1.8K
    PROS OF CLOUDFLARE
    • 424
      Easy setup, great cdn
    • 277
      Free ssl
    • 199
      Easy setup
    • 190
      Security
    • 180
      Ssl
    • 98
      Great cdn
    • 77
      Optimizer
    • 71
      Simple
    • 44
      Great UI
    • 28
      Great js cdn
    • 12
      Apps
    • 12
      HTTP/2 Support
    • 12
      DNS Analytics
    • 12
      AutoMinify
    • 9
      Rocket Loader
    • 9
      Ipv6
    • 9
      Easy
    • 8
      IPv6 "One Click"
    • 8
      Fantastic CDN service
    • 7
      DNSSEC
    • 7
      Nice DNS
    • 7
      SSHFP
    • 7
      Free GeoIP
    • 7
      Amazing performance
    • 7
      API
    • 7
      Cheapest SSL
    • 6
      SPDY
    • 6
      Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
    • 5
      Ubuntu
    • 5
      Asynchronous resource loading
    • 4
      Global Load Balancing
    • 4
      Performance
    • 4
      Easy Use
    • 3
      CDN
    • 2
      Registrar
    • 2
      Support for SSHFP records
    • 1
      Web3
    • 1
      Прохси
    • 1
      HTTPS3/Quic
    CONS OF CLOUDFLARE
    • 2
      No support for SSHFP records
    • 2
      Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits

    related CloudFlare posts

    Eugene Cheah

    For inboxkitten.com, an opensource disposable email service;

    We migrated our serverless workload from Cloud Functions for Firebase to CloudFlare workers, taking advantage of the lower cost and faster-performing edge computing of Cloudflare network. Made possible due to our extremely low CPU and RAM overhead of our serverless functions.

    If I were to summarize the limitation of Cloudflare (as oppose to firebase/gcp functions), it would be ...

    1. <5ms CPU time limit
    2. Incompatible with express.js
    3. one script limitation per domain

    Limitations our workload is able to conform with (YMMV)

    For hosting of static files, we migrated from Firebase to CommonsHost

    More details on the trade-off in between both serverless providers is in the article

    See more
    CDG

    I use Laravel because it's the most advances PHP framework out there, easy to maintain, easy to upgrade and most of all : easy to get a handle on, and to follow every new technology ! PhpStorm is our main software to code, as of simplicity and full range of tools for a modern application.

    Google Analytics Analytics of course for a tailored analytics, Bulma as an innovative CSS framework, coupled with our Sass (Scss) pre-processor.

    As of more basic stuff, we use HTML5, JavaScript (but with Vue.js too) and Webpack to handle the generation of all this.

    To deploy, we set up Buddy to easily send the updates on our nginx / Ubuntu server, where it will connect to our GitHub Git private repository, pull and do all the operations needed with Deployer .

    CloudFlare ensure the rapidity of distribution of our content, and Let's Encrypt the https certificate that is more than necessary when we'll want to sell some products with our Stripe api calls.

    Asana is here to let us list all the functionalities, possibilities and ideas we want to implement.

    See more
    imgix logo

    imgix

    217
    321
    177
    Optimize, manage, and deliver images and videos for faster pages, better visual quality, and a simpler workflow.
    217
    321
    + 1
    177
    PROS OF IMGIX
    • 28
      Image processing on demand
    • 24
      Easy setup
    • 18
      Smart Cropping
    • 18
      Reduce Development Costs
    • 15
      Efficient
    • 12
      Insanely Fast
    • 11
      Filters, resizing, blur and more as url parameters
    • 10
      Easy to understand pricing
    • 9
      Professional Features and Options
    • 6
      Excellent Face Detection
    • 6
      Lightyears better than ImageMagick
    • 5
      S3 as source
    • 4
      Great for Dynamic Compositing
    • 4
      Scales to your company's needs
    • 1
      Free tier
    • 1
      Amazing support
    • 1
      Great libraries and integrations
    • 1
      Automatic scrset generation
    • 1
      Forward thinking
    • 1
      Video encoding
    • 1
      Fast Image Delivery
    CONS OF IMGIX
      Be the first to leave a con

      related imgix posts

      Mountain/ \Ash

      Platform Update: we’ve been using the Performance Test tool provided by KeyCDN for a long time in combination with Pingdom's similar tool and the #WebpageTest and #GoogleInsight - we decided to test out KeyCDN for static asset hosting. The results for the endpoints were superfast - almost 200% faster than CloudFlare in some tests and 370% faster than imgix . So we’ve moved Washington Brown from imgix for hosting theme images, to KeyCDN for hosting all images and static assets (Font, CSS & JS). There’s a few things that we like about “Key” apart from saving $6 a month on the monthly minimum spend ($4 vs $10 for imgix). Key allow for a custom CNAME (no more advertising imgix.com in domain requests and possible SEO improvements - and easier to swap to another host down the track). Key allows JPEG/WebP image requests based on clients ‘accept’ http headers - imgix required a ?auto=format query string on each image resource request - which can break some caches. Key allows for explicitly denying cookies to be set on a zone/domain; cookies are a big strain on limited upload bandwidth so to be able to force these off is great - Cloudflare adds a cookie to every header… for “performance reasons”… but remember “if you’re getting a product something for free…”

      See more
      Mountain/ \Ash

      In mid-2018 we made a big push for speed on the site. The site, running on PHP, was taking about 7 seconds to load. The site had already been running through CloudFlare for some time but on a shared host in Sydney (which is also where most of the customers are). We found when developing the @TuffTruck site that DigitalOcean was fast - and even though it's located overseas, we still found it 2 seconds faster for Australian users. We found that some Wordpress plugins were really slowing the TTFB - with all plugins off, Wordpress would save respond 1.5-2 seconds faster. With a on/off step through of each plugin we found 2 plugins by Ontraport (a CRM type service that some forms we populating) was the main culprit. Out it went and we built our own WP plugin to do push the data to Ontraport only when required. With the TTFB acceptable, we moved on to getting the completed page load time down. Turning on CloudFlare 's HTML/CSS/JS minifications & Rocket Loader we could get our group of test pages, including the homepage, loading [in full] in just over 2 seconds. We then moved images off to imgix and put the CSS, JS and Fonts onto a mirrored subdomain (so that cookies weren't exchanged), but this only shaved about another 0.2 seconds off. We are keeping it running for the moment, but the $10 minimum a month for imgix is hardly worth it (this would be change if new images were going up all the time and needed processing). The client is overly happy with the ~70% improvement and has already seen the site move up the ranks of Google's SERP and bring down their PPC costs. AND all the new hosting providers still come in at half the price of the previous Sydney hosting service. We have a few ideas that we are testing on our staging site and will roll these out soon.

      See more
      Akamai logo

      Akamai

      1.9K
      435
      0
      The leading platform for cloud, mobile, media and security across any device, anywhere.
      1.9K
      435
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF AKAMAI
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF AKAMAI
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Akamai posts

          Amazon S3 logo

          Amazon S3

          52.8K
          39.5K
          2K
          Store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web
          52.8K
          39.5K
          + 1
          2K
          PROS OF AMAZON S3
          • 590
            Reliable
          • 492
            Scalable
          • 456
            Cheap
          • 329
            Simple & easy
          • 83
            Many sdks
          • 30
            Logical
          • 13
            Easy Setup
          • 11
            REST API
          • 11
            1000+ POPs
          • 6
            Secure
          • 4
            Plug and play
          • 4
            Easy
          • 3
            Web UI for uploading files
          • 2
            Faster on response
          • 2
            Flexible
          • 2
            GDPR ready
          • 1
            Easy to use
          • 1
            Plug-gable
          • 1
            Easy integration with CloudFront
          CONS OF AMAZON S3
          • 7
            Permissions take some time to get right
          • 6
            Requires a credit card
          • 6
            Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly
          • 3
            Complex to set up

          related Amazon S3 posts

          Ashish Singh
          Tech Lead, Big Data Platform at Pinterest · | 38 upvotes · 3M views

          To provide employees with the critical need of interactive querying, we’ve worked with Presto, an open-source distributed SQL query engine, over the years. Operating Presto at Pinterest’s scale has involved resolving quite a few challenges like, supporting deeply nested and huge thrift schemas, slow/ bad worker detection and remediation, auto-scaling cluster, graceful cluster shutdown and impersonation support for ldap authenticator.

          Our infrastructure is built on top of Amazon EC2 and we leverage Amazon S3 for storing our data. This separates compute and storage layers, and allows multiple compute clusters to share the S3 data.

          We have hundreds of petabytes of data and tens of thousands of Apache Hive tables. Our Presto clusters are comprised of a fleet of 450 r4.8xl EC2 instances. Presto clusters together have over 100 TBs of memory and 14K vcpu cores. Within Pinterest, we have close to more than 1,000 monthly active users (out of total 1,600+ Pinterest employees) using Presto, who run about 400K queries on these clusters per month.

          Each query submitted to Presto cluster is logged to a Kafka topic via Singer. Singer is a logging agent built at Pinterest and we talked about it in a previous post. Each query is logged when it is submitted and when it finishes. When a Presto cluster crashes, we will have query submitted events without corresponding query finished events. These events enable us to capture the effect of cluster crashes over time.

          Each Presto cluster at Pinterest has workers on a mix of dedicated AWS EC2 instances and Kubernetes pods. Kubernetes platform provides us with the capability to add and remove workers from a Presto cluster very quickly. The best-case latency on bringing up a new worker on Kubernetes is less than a minute. However, when the Kubernetes cluster itself is out of resources and needs to scale up, it can take up to ten minutes. Some other advantages of deploying on Kubernetes platform is that our Presto deployment becomes agnostic of cloud vendor, instance types, OS, etc.

          #BigData #AWS #DataScience #DataEngineering

          See more
          Russel Werner
          Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 32 upvotes · 2.6M views

          StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

          Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

          #StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

          See more
          Firebase logo

          Firebase

          40.5K
          34.8K
          2K
          The Realtime App Platform
          40.5K
          34.8K
          + 1
          2K
          PROS OF FIREBASE
          • 371
            Realtime backend made easy
          • 270
            Fast and responsive
          • 242
            Easy setup
          • 215
            Real-time
          • 191
            JSON
          • 134
            Free
          • 128
            Backed by google
          • 83
            Angular adaptor
          • 68
            Reliable
          • 36
            Great customer support
          • 32
            Great documentation
          • 25
            Real-time synchronization
          • 21
            Mobile friendly
          • 19
            Rapid prototyping
          • 14
            Great security
          • 12
            Automatic scaling
          • 11
            Freakingly awesome
          • 8
            Super fast development
          • 8
            Angularfire is an amazing addition!
          • 8
            Chat
          • 6
            Firebase hosting
          • 6
            Built in user auth/oauth
          • 6
            Awesome next-gen backend
          • 6
            Ios adaptor
          • 4
            Speed of light
          • 4
            Very easy to use
          • 3
            Great
          • 3
            It's made development super fast
          • 3
            Brilliant for startups
          • 2
            Free hosting
          • 2
            Cloud functions
          • 2
            JS Offline and Sync suport
          • 2
            Low battery consumption
          • 2
            .net
          • 2
            The concurrent updates create a great experience
          • 2
            Push notification
          • 2
            I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
          • 2
            Great all-round functionality
          • 2
            Free authentication solution
          • 1
            Easy Reactjs integration
          • 1
            Google's support
          • 1
            Free SSL
          • 1
            CDN & cache out of the box
          • 1
            Easy to use
          • 1
            Large
          • 1
            Faster workflow
          • 1
            Serverless
          • 1
            Good Free Limits
          • 1
            Simple and easy
          CONS OF FIREBASE
          • 31
            Can become expensive
          • 16
            No open source, you depend on external company
          • 15
            Scalability is not infinite
          • 9
            Not Flexible Enough
          • 7
            Cant filter queries
          • 3
            Very unstable server
          • 3
            No Relational Data
          • 2
            Too many errors
          • 2
            No offline sync

          related Firebase posts

          Johnny Bell

          I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

          I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

          I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

          Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

          Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

          With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

          If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

          See more
          Collins Ogbuzuru
          Front-end dev at Evolve credit · | 20 upvotes · 28.1K views

          Your tech stack is solid for building a real-time messaging project.

          React and React Native are excellent choices for the frontend, especially if you want to have both web and mobile versions of your application share code.

          ExpressJS is an unopinionated framework that affords you the flexibility to use it's features at your term, which is a good start. However, I would recommend you explore Sails.js as well. Sails.js is built on top of Express.js and it provides additional features out of the box, especially the Websocket integration that your project requires.

          Don't forget to set up Graphql codegen, this would improve your dev experience (Add Typescript, if you can too).

          I don't know much about databases but you might want to consider using NO-SQL. I used Firebase real-time db and aws dynamo db on a few of my personal projects and I love they're easy to work with and offer more flexibility for a chat application.

          See more
          Filestack logo

          Filestack

          85
          114
          3
          Easy, Powerful File Uploads
          85
          114
          + 1
          3
          PROS OF FILESTACK
          • 4
            All the sources I need
          CONS OF FILESTACK
          • 1
            Slow support

          related Filestack posts

          Uploadcare logo

          Uploadcare

          73
          121
          27
          File uploads, media processing, and adaptive delivery for web and mobile
          73
          121
          + 1
          27
          PROS OF UPLOADCARE
          • 10
            Great team
          • 6
            Simple image upload with widget
          • 5
            Easy to integrate into any website
          • 5
            Awesome support
          • 1
            <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
          CONS OF UPLOADCARE
          • 1
            Upload widget is large (114KB)
          • 0
            no cons

          related Uploadcare posts