Alternatives to Cloudinary logo

Alternatives to Cloudinary

CloudFlare, imgix, Amazon S3, Akamai, and Firebase are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Cloudinary.
443
413
+ 1
176

What is Cloudinary and what are its top alternatives?

Cloudinary is a cloud-based service that streamlines websites and mobile applications' entire image and video management needs - uploads, storage, administration, manipulations, and delivery.
Cloudinary is a tool in the Image Processing and Management category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Cloudinary

  • CloudFlare

    CloudFlare

    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...

  • imgix

    imgix

    imgix is a real-time image processing service and CDN. Resize, crop, and edit images simply by changing their URLs. ...

  • Amazon S3

    Amazon S3

    Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web ...

  • Akamai

    Akamai

    If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward. ...

  • Firebase

    Firebase

    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds. ...

  • Filestack

    Filestack

    Filepicker helps developers connect to their users' content. Connect, Store, and Process any file from anywhere on the Internet. ...

  • Uploadcare

    Uploadcare

    Uploadcare is a complete file handling platform for online business. Receive files from you users via File Uploader or File Upload API, implement image optimization and transformations with Image CDN API, and get HIPAA-compliant storage. ...

  • ImageKit

    ImageKit

    It is an image optimization solution that offers smart image optimization in real-time, enabling you to easily optimize images via dynamic resizing and cropping as well as seamless and fast delivery. The software allows you to reduce images sizes while retaining high quality resolution. ...

Cloudinary alternatives & related posts

CloudFlare logo

CloudFlare

62.8K
11.3K
1.6K
The Web Performance & Security Company.
62.8K
11.3K
+ 1
1.6K
PROS OF CLOUDFLARE
  • 416
    Easy setup, great cdn
  • 255
    Free ssl
  • 193
    Easy setup
  • 184
    Security
  • 164
    Ssl
  • 92
    Great cdn
  • 76
    Optimizer
  • 68
    Simple
  • 43
    Great UI
  • 26
    Great js cdn
  • 11
    DNS Analytics
  • 11
    AutoMinify
  • 11
    Apps
  • 8
    Rocket Loader
  • 8
    Easy
  • 6
    IPv6 "One Click"
  • 5
    DNSSEC
  • 5
    API
  • 5
    Cheapest SSL
  • 4
    Amazing performance
  • 4
    Ipv6
  • 4
    Fantastic CDN service
  • 4
    SPDY
  • 4
    Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
  • 4
    Asynchronous resource loading
  • 4
    HTTP/2 Support
  • 3
    Free GeoIP
  • 3
    Nice DNS
  • 3
    Performance
  • 3
    Easy Use
  • 3
    Global Load Balancing
  • 2
    SSHFP
  • 1
    Maker
CONS OF CLOUDFLARE
  • 1
    No support for SSHFP records

related CloudFlare posts

Johnny Bell
Software Engineer at Weedmaps · | 11 upvotes · 278K views

When I first built my portfolio I used GitHub for the source control and deployed directly to Netlify on a push to master. This was a perfect setup, I didn't need any knowledge about #DevOps or anything, it was all just done for me.

One of the issues I had with Netlify was I wanted to gzip my JavaScript files, I had this setup in my #Webpack file, however Netlify didn't offer an easy way to set this.

Over the weekend I decided I wanted to know more about how #DevOps worked so I decided to switch from Netlify to Amazon S3. Instead of creating any #Git Webhooks I decided to use Buddy for my pipeline and to run commands. Buddy is a fantastic tool, very easy to setup builds, copying the files to my Amazon S3 bucket, then running some #AWS console commands to set the content-encoding of the JavaScript files. - Buddy is also free if you only have a few pipelines, so I didn't need to pay anything 🤙🏻.

When I made these changes I also wanted to monitor my code, and make sure I was keeping up with the best practices so I implemented Code Climate to look over my code and tell me where there code smells, issues, and other issues I've been super happy with it so far, on the free tier so its also free.

I did plan on using Amazon CloudFront for my SSL and cacheing, however it was overly complex to setup and it costs money. So I decided to go with the free tier of CloudFlare and it is amazing, best choice I've made for caching / SSL in a long time.

See more
Johnny Bell
Software Engineer at Weedmaps · | 7 upvotes · 186K views

I recently moved my portfolio to Amazon S3 and I needed a new way to cache and SSL my site as Amazon S3 does not come with this right out of the box. I tried Amazon CloudFront as I was already on Amazon S3 I thought this would be super easy and straight forward to setup... It was not, I was unable to get this working even though I followed all the online steps and even reached out for help to Amazon.

I'd used CloudFlare in the past, and thought let me see if I can set up CloudFlare on an Amazon S3 bucket. The setup for this was so basic and easy... I had it setup with caching and SSL within 5 minutes, and it was 100% free.

See more
imgix logo

imgix

178
234
140
Real-time image resizing service and CDN
178
234
+ 1
140
PROS OF IMGIX
  • 25
    Image processing on demand
  • 22
    Easy setup
  • 16
    Reduce Development Costs
  • 15
    Smart Cropping
  • 13
    Efficient
  • 10
    Insanely Fast
  • 9
    Filters, resizing, blur and more as url parameters
  • 8
    Easy to understand pricing
  • 7
    Professional Features and Options
  • 4
    Lightyears better than ImageMagick
  • 4
    Excellent Face Detection
  • 3
    S3 as source
  • 2
    Great for Dynamic Compositing
  • 2
    Scales to your company's needs
CONS OF IMGIX
    Be the first to leave a con

    related imgix posts

    Mountain/ \Ash

    Platform Update: we’ve been using the Performance Test tool provided by KeyCDN for a long time in combination with Pingdom's similar tool and the #WebpageTest and #GoogleInsight - we decided to test out KeyCDN for static asset hosting. The results for the endpoints were superfast - almost 200% faster than CloudFlare in some tests and 370% faster than imgix . So we’ve moved Washington Brown from imgix for hosting theme images, to KeyCDN for hosting all images and static assets (Font, CSS & JS). There’s a few things that we like about “Key” apart from saving $6 a month on the monthly minimum spend ($4 vs $10 for imgix). Key allow for a custom CNAME (no more advertising imgix.com in domain requests and possible SEO improvements - and easier to swap to another host down the track). Key allows JPEG/WebP image requests based on clients ‘accept’ http headers - imgix required a ?auto=format query string on each image resource request - which can break some caches. Key allows for explicitly denying cookies to be set on a zone/domain; cookies are a big strain on limited upload bandwidth so to be able to force these off is great - Cloudflare adds a cookie to every header… for “performance reasons”… but remember “if you’re getting a product something for free…”

    See more
    Mountain/ \Ash

    In mid-2018 we made a big push for speed on the site. The site, running on PHP, was taking about 7 seconds to load. The site had already been running through CloudFlare for some time but on a shared host in Sydney (which is also where most of the customers are). We found when developing the @TuffTruck site that DigitalOcean was fast - and even though it's located overseas, we still found it 2 seconds faster for Australian users. We found that some Wordpress plugins were really slowing the TTFB - with all plugins off, Wordpress would save respond 1.5-2 seconds faster. With a on/off step through of each plugin we found 2 plugins by Ontraport (a CRM type service that some forms we populating) was the main culprit. Out it went and we built our own WP plugin to do push the data to Ontraport only when required. With the TTFB acceptable, we moved on to getting the completed page load time down. Turning on CloudFlare 's HTML/CSS/JS minifications & Rocket Loader we could get our group of test pages, including the homepage, loading [in full] in just over 2 seconds. We then moved images off to imgix and put the CSS, JS and Fonts onto a mirrored subdomain (so that cookies weren't exchanged), but this only shaved about another 0.2 seconds off. We are keeping it running for the moment, but the $10 minimum a month for imgix is hardly worth it (this would be change if new images were going up all the time and needed processing). The client is overly happy with the ~70% improvement and has already seen the site move up the ranks of Google's SERP and bring down their PPC costs. AND all the new hosting providers still come in at half the price of the previous Sydney hosting service. We have a few ideas that we are testing on our staging site and will roll these out soon.

    See more
    Amazon S3 logo

    Amazon S3

    34.2K
    23.4K
    2K
    Store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web
    34.2K
    23.4K
    + 1
    2K
    PROS OF AMAZON S3
    • 590
      Reliable
    • 492
      Scalable
    • 456
      Cheap
    • 328
      Simple & easy
    • 83
      Many sdks
    • 29
      Logical
    • 12
      Easy Setup
    • 11
      1000+ POPs
    • 10
      REST API
    • 5
      Secure
    • 2
      Plug and play
    • 2
      Web UI for uploading files
    • 2
      Easy
    • 1
      GDPR ready
    • 1
      Flexible
    • 1
      Faster on response
    • 1
      Plug-gable
    • 1
      Easy to use
    • 1
      Easy integration with CloudFront
    CONS OF AMAZON S3
    • 7
      Permissions take some time to get right
    • 6
      Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly
    • 5
      Requires a credit card
    • 3
      Complex to set up

    related Amazon S3 posts

    Ashish Singh
    Tech Lead, Big Data Platform at Pinterest · | 35 upvotes · 668.3K views

    To provide employees with the critical need of interactive querying, we’ve worked with Presto, an open-source distributed SQL query engine, over the years. Operating Presto at Pinterest’s scale has involved resolving quite a few challenges like, supporting deeply nested and huge thrift schemas, slow/ bad worker detection and remediation, auto-scaling cluster, graceful cluster shutdown and impersonation support for ldap authenticator.

    Our infrastructure is built on top of Amazon EC2 and we leverage Amazon S3 for storing our data. This separates compute and storage layers, and allows multiple compute clusters to share the S3 data.

    We have hundreds of petabytes of data and tens of thousands of Apache Hive tables. Our Presto clusters are comprised of a fleet of 450 r4.8xl EC2 instances. Presto clusters together have over 100 TBs of memory and 14K vcpu cores. Within Pinterest, we have close to more than 1,000 monthly active users (out of total 1,600+ Pinterest employees) using Presto, who run about 400K queries on these clusters per month.

    Each query submitted to Presto cluster is logged to a Kafka topic via Singer. Singer is a logging agent built at Pinterest and we talked about it in a previous post. Each query is logged when it is submitted and when it finishes. When a Presto cluster crashes, we will have query submitted events without corresponding query finished events. These events enable us to capture the effect of cluster crashes over time.

    Each Presto cluster at Pinterest has workers on a mix of dedicated AWS EC2 instances and Kubernetes pods. Kubernetes platform provides us with the capability to add and remove workers from a Presto cluster very quickly. The best-case latency on bringing up a new worker on Kubernetes is less than a minute. However, when the Kubernetes cluster itself is out of resources and needs to scale up, it can take up to ten minutes. Some other advantages of deploying on Kubernetes platform is that our Presto deployment becomes agnostic of cloud vendor, instance types, OS, etc.

    #BigData #AWS #DataScience #DataEngineering

    See more
    Simon Reymann
    Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 28 upvotes · 2.2M views

    Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

    • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
    • Respectively Git as revision control system
    • SourceTree as Git GUI
    • Visual Studio Code as IDE
    • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
    • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
    • SonarQube as quality gate
    • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
    • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
    • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
    • Heroku for deploying in test environments
    • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
    • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
    • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
    • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
    • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

    The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

    • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
    • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
    • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
    • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
    • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
    • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
    See more
    Akamai logo

    Akamai

    1.9K
    346
    0
    The leading platform for cloud, mobile, media and security across any device, anywhere.
    1.9K
    346
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF AKAMAI
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF AKAMAI
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Akamai posts

        Firebase logo

        Firebase

        22.7K
        18.7K
        1.9K
        The Realtime App Platform
        22.7K
        18.7K
        + 1
        1.9K
        PROS OF FIREBASE
        • 357
          Realtime backend made easy
        • 261
          Fast and responsive
        • 233
          Easy setup
        • 206
          Real-time
        • 184
          JSON
        • 126
          Free
        • 120
          Backed by google
        • 80
          Angular adaptor
        • 62
          Reliable
        • 36
          Great customer support
        • 25
          Great documentation
        • 22
          Real-time synchronization
        • 19
          Mobile friendly
        • 17
          Rapid prototyping
        • 12
          Great security
        • 10
          Automatic scaling
        • 9
          Freakingly awesome
        • 8
          Super fast development
        • 8
          Chat
        • 8
          Angularfire is an amazing addition!
        • 6
          Awesome next-gen backend
        • 6
          Ios adaptor
        • 5
          Firebase hosting
        • 5
          Built in user auth/oauth
        • 4
          Very easy to use
        • 3
          Great
        • 3
          Speed of light
        • 3
          Brilliant for startups
        • 3
          It's made development super fast
        • 2
          Low battery consumption
        • 2
          The concurrent updates create a great experience
        • 2
          I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
        • 2
          Great all-round functionality
        • 1
          Easy Reactjs integration
        • 1
          Good Free Limits
        • 1
          .net
        • 1
          Faster workflow
        • 1
          Serverless
        • 1
          JS Offline and Sync suport
        • 1
          Easy to use
        • 1
          Large
        • 1
          Push notification
        CONS OF FIREBASE
        • 26
          Can become expensive
        • 14
          No open source, you depend on external company
        • 14
          Scalability is not infinite
        • 9
          Not Flexible Enough
        • 5
          Cant filter queries
        • 3
          Very unstable server
        • 2
          Too many errors
        • 2
          No Relational Data

        related Firebase posts

        Tassanai Singprom

        This is my stack in Application & Data

        JavaScript PHP HTML5 jQuery Redis Amazon EC2 Ubuntu Sass Vue.js Firebase Laravel Lumen Amazon RDS GraphQL MariaDB

        My Utilities Tools

        Google Analytics Postman Elasticsearch

        My Devops Tools

        Git GitHub GitLab npm Visual Studio Code Kibana Sentry BrowserStack

        My Business Tools

        Slack

        See more

        We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

        See more
        Filestack logo

        Filestack

        81
        83
        1
        Easy, Powerful File Uploads
        81
        83
        + 1
        1
        PROS OF FILESTACK
        • 1
          All the sources I need
        CONS OF FILESTACK
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Filestack posts

          Uploadcare logo

          Uploadcare

          55
          90
          23
          File uploads, media processing, and adaptive delivery for web and mobile
          55
          90
          + 1
          23
          PROS OF UPLOADCARE
          • 8
            Great team
          • 5
            Awesome support
          • 5
            Simple image upload with widget
          • 4
            Easy to integrate into any website
          • 1
            <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
          CONS OF UPLOADCARE
          • 0
            no cons

          related Uploadcare posts

          ImageKit logo

          ImageKit

          18
          24
          26
          Automate image optimization on all platforms
          18
          24
          + 1
          26
          PROS OF IMAGEKIT
          • 3
            S3 integration
          • 3
            Unlimited transformations
          • 3
            Easy to integrate
          • 3
            Unlimited thumbnail storage
          • 3
            Pay as you go pricing
          • 2
            Quick support
          • 2
            Forever free plan
          • 2
            SDKs for many languages
          • 1
            Media library for asset management-tag,organise,search
          • 1
            Reduces developer efforts
          • 1
            Performance alerts & Optimization report
          • 1
            AI based Smart cropping
          • 1
            Fast image delivery
          CONS OF IMAGEKIT
            Be the first to leave a con

            related ImageKit posts