Alternatives to Zencoder logo

Alternatives to Zencoder

Amazon Elastic Transcoder, Bitmovin, Google Drive, CloudFlare, and Dropbox are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Zencoder.
29
37
+ 1
11

What is Zencoder and what are its top alternatives?

Zencoder is a cloud-based video encoding platform that offers scalable and reliable encoding services for businesses of all sizes. Key features include support for a wide range of input and output formats, adaptive bitrate streaming, API access for automation, and high-quality encoding algorithms. However, Zencoder may be on the higher end in terms of pricing, and some users may find the learning curve steep when setting up complex encoding workflows.

  1. FFmpeg: FFmpeg is a powerful open-source multimedia framework that can be used for encoding, decoding, transcoding, and streaming audio and video. Key features include support for a vast number of codecs and formats, high customization options, and free availability. However, setting up and configuring FFmpeg can be complex for beginners compared to Zencoder.

  2. HandBrake: HandBrake is a free and open-source video transcoder that offers a simple and user-friendly interface for converting video files. Key features include support for multiple input formats, batch encoding, and customizable presets. However, HandBrake may not offer as many advanced encoding options as Zencoder.

  3. Clipchamp: Clipchamp is a cloud-based video encoding tool that allows users to compress, convert, and edit videos online. Key features include support for a variety of formats, fast processing speeds, and an intuitive interface. However, Clipchamp may lack some of the advanced encoding features found in Zencoder.

  4. Encoding.com: Encoding.com is a cloud-based video encoding platform that offers scalable encoding services for businesses. Key features include support for a wide range of video formats, APIs for automation, and high-quality encoding outputs. However, pricing plans may vary compared to Zencoder.

  5. Cloudinary: Cloudinary is a cloud-based media management platform that offers video encoding as part of its suite of services. Key features include automatic transcoding, adaptive bitrate streaming, and integration with popular CMS platforms. However, Cloudinary's pricing structure may differ from Zencoder.

  6. Bitmovin: Bitmovin is a cloud-based video encoding and streaming platform that offers high-performance encoding services for businesses. Key features include support for adaptive bitrate streaming, APIs for customization, and cloud infrastructure for scalability. However, Bitmovin may have a steeper learning curve compared to Zencoder.

  7. Mux: Mux is a video infrastructure platform that includes video encoding services for businesses. Key features include high-quality encoding outputs, real-time monitoring, and adaptive bitrate streaming. However, Mux may have pricing plans that differ from Zencoder.

  8. Telestream Cloud: Telestream Cloud is a cloud-based video encoding platform that offers scalable encoding services for businesses. Key features include support for a wide range of formats, APIs for automation, and configurable presets. However, Telestream Cloud may have a different pricing structure compared to Zencoder.

  9. Brightcove: Brightcove is a video platform that includes encoding services as part of its suite of features. Key features include scalable encoding workflows, adaptive bitrate streaming, and integration with analytics tools. However, Brightcove may have pricing plans that differ from Zencoder.

  10. Wowza: Wowza is a streaming software and services company that offers video transcoding as part of its streaming solutions. Key features include high-quality encoding outputs, support for multiple formats, and customization options. However, Wowza's pricing plans may vary compared to Zencoder.

Top Alternatives to Zencoder

  • Amazon Elastic Transcoder
    Amazon Elastic Transcoder

    Convert or transcode media files from their source format into versions that will playback on devices like smartphones, tablets and PCs. Create a transcoding “job” specifying the location of your source media file and how you want it transcoded. Amazon Elastic Transcoder also provides transcoding presets for popular output formats. All these features are available via service API, AWS SDKs and the AWS Management Console. ...

  • Bitmovin
    Bitmovin

    It provides adaptive streaming infrastructure for video publishers and integrators. Fastest cloud encoding and HTML5 Player, play Video Anywhere. ...

  • Google Drive
    Google Drive

    Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer. ...

  • CloudFlare
    CloudFlare

    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...

  • Dropbox
    Dropbox

    Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more. ...

  • Amazon CloudFront
    Amazon CloudFront

    Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance. ...

  • Akamai
    Akamai

    If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward. ...

  • MaxCDN
    MaxCDN

    The MaxCDN Content Delivery Network efficiently delivers your site’s static file through hundreds of servers instead of slogging through a single host. This "smart route" technology distributes your content to your visitors via the city closest to them. ...

Zencoder alternatives & related posts

Amazon Elastic Transcoder logo

Amazon Elastic Transcoder

90
0
Media transcoding in the cloud using Amazon EC2
90
0
PROS OF AMAZON ELASTIC TRANSCODER
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF AMAZON ELASTIC TRANSCODER
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Amazon Elastic Transcoder posts

      Alex Wendland

      We were looking for a versatile #MediaTranscoding service for #video to convert TV shows and movies from large content providers into web #VideoStreaming formats. These content providers gave us files ranging from Apple ProRes to h.264, with file sizes from 1 GB to 100 GB, and we needed a tool that could cope with all of it. We looked at Amazon Elastic Transcoder and Zencoder, and eventually chose @Zencoder because it had support for every format we needed, good handling of sound channel remapping, and a clear UI with fast processing times. We automated our usage with it by writing a simple Python script to interact with it's API, and hosted the input and output AV files on Amazon S3, which it could easily talk to. So far we've converted 15 TB representing several thousand files using the service and are quite happy!

      See more
      Bitmovin logo

      Bitmovin

      10
      0
      Video Infrastructure for the Web
      10
      0
      PROS OF BITMOVIN
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF BITMOVIN
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Bitmovin posts

          Shared insights
          on
          WowzaWowzaBitmovinBitmovin

          We want to make a live streaming platform demo to show off our video compression technology.

          Simply put, we will stream content from 12 x 4K cameras ——> to an edge server(s) containing our compression software ——> either to Bitmovin or Wowza ——> to a media player.

          What we would like to know is, is one of the above streaming engines more suited to multiple feeds (we will eventually be using more than 100 4K cameras for the actual streaming platform), 4K content streaming, latency, and functions such as being to Zoom in on the 4K content?

          If anyone has any insight into the above, we would be grateful for your advice. We are a Japanese company and were recommended the above two streaming engines but know nothing about them as they literally “foreign” to us.

          Thanks so much.

          See more
          Google Drive logo

          Google Drive

          83.3K
          2.1K
          A safe place for all your files
          83.3K
          2.1K
          PROS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
          • 505
            Easy to use
          • 326
            Gmail integration
          • 312
            Enough free space
          • 268
            Collaboration
          • 249
            Stable service
          • 128
            Desktop and mobile apps
          • 97
            Offline sync
          • 79
            Apps
          • 74
            15 gb storage
          • 50
            Add-ons
          • 9
            Integrates well
          • 6
            Easy to use
          • 3
            Simple back-up tool
          • 2
            Linux terminal transfer tools
          • 2
            It has grown to a stable in the cloud office
          • 2
            Amazing
          • 2
            Beautiful
          • 2
            Fast upload speeds
          • 2
            The more the merrier
          • 2
            So easy
          • 2
            Wonderful
          • 1
            G Suite integration
          • 1
            UI
          • 1
            Windows desktop
          • 1
            Space Analytics
          CONS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
          • 7
            Organization via web ui sucks
          • 2
            Not a real database

          related Google Drive posts

          Tom Klein

          Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

          See more
          Shared insights
          on
          Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

          I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

          Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

          See more
          CloudFlare logo

          CloudFlare

          77.1K
          1.8K
          The Web Performance & Security Company.
          77.1K
          1.8K
          PROS OF CLOUDFLARE
          • 426
            Easy setup, great cdn
          • 278
            Free ssl
          • 200
            Easy setup
          • 191
            Security
          • 181
            Ssl
          • 98
            Great cdn
          • 77
            Optimizer
          • 71
            Simple
          • 44
            Great UI
          • 28
            Great js cdn
          • 12
            AutoMinify
          • 12
            HTTP/2 Support
          • 12
            Apps
          • 12
            DNS Analytics
          • 9
            Ipv6
          • 9
            Rocket Loader
          • 9
            Easy
          • 8
            Fantastic CDN service
          • 8
            IPv6 "One Click"
          • 7
            DNSSEC
          • 7
            Free GeoIP
          • 7
            Amazing performance
          • 7
            API
          • 7
            Cheapest SSL
          • 7
            Nice DNS
          • 7
            SSHFP
          • 6
            SPDY
          • 6
            Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
          • 5
            Asynchronous resource loading
          • 5
            Ubuntu
          • 4
            Global Load Balancing
          • 4
            Easy Use
          • 4
            Performance
          • 3
            CDN
          • 2
            Support for SSHFP records
          • 2
            Registrar
          • 1
            Web3
          • 1
            Прохси
          • 1
            HTTPS3/Quic
          CONS OF CLOUDFLARE
          • 2
            No support for SSHFP records
          • 2
            Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits

          related CloudFlare posts

          Tom Klein

          Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

          See more
          Johnny Bell

          When I first built my portfolio I used GitHub for the source control and deployed directly to Netlify on a push to master. This was a perfect setup, I didn't need any knowledge about #DevOps or anything, it was all just done for me.

          One of the issues I had with Netlify was I wanted to gzip my JavaScript files, I had this setup in my #Webpack file, however Netlify didn't offer an easy way to set this.

          Over the weekend I decided I wanted to know more about how #DevOps worked so I decided to switch from Netlify to Amazon S3. Instead of creating any #Git Webhooks I decided to use Buddy for my pipeline and to run commands. Buddy is a fantastic tool, very easy to setup builds, copying the files to my Amazon S3 bucket, then running some #AWS console commands to set the content-encoding of the JavaScript files. - Buddy is also free if you only have a few pipelines, so I didn't need to pay anything 🤙🏻.

          When I made these changes I also wanted to monitor my code, and make sure I was keeping up with the best practices so I implemented Code Climate to look over my code and tell me where there code smells, issues, and other issues I've been super happy with it so far, on the free tier so its also free.

          I did plan on using Amazon CloudFront for my SSL and cacheing, however it was overly complex to setup and it costs money. So I decided to go with the free tier of CloudFlare and it is amazing, best choice I've made for caching / SSL in a long time.

          See more
          Dropbox logo

          Dropbox

          23.5K
          1.7K
          Build the power of Dropbox into your apps
          23.5K
          1.7K
          PROS OF DROPBOX
          • 434
            Easy to work with
          • 256
            Free
          • 216
            Popular
          • 176
            Shared file hosting
          • 167
            'just works'
          • 100
            No brainer
          • 80
            Integration with external services
          • 77
            Simple
          • 49
            Good api
          • 38
            Least cost (free) for the basic needs case
          • 11
            It just works
          • 8
            Convenient
          • 7
            Accessible from all of my devices
          • 5
            Command Line client
          • 4
            Synchronizing laptop and desktop - work anywhere
          • 4
            Can even be used by your grandma
          • 3
            Cross platform app
          • 3
            Sync API
          • 3
            Reliable
          • 3
            Mac app
          • 2
            Backups, local and cloud
          • 2
            Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliably
          • 2
            Delta synchronization
          • 2
            Ability to pay monthly without losing your files
          • 2
            Extended version history
          • 2
            Beautiful UI
          • 1
            YC Company
          • 1
            What a beautiful app
          • 1
            Easy/no setup
          • 1
            So easy
          • 1
            The more the merrier
          • 1
            Easy to work with
          • 1
            For when client needs file without opening firewall
          • 1
            Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliabl
          • 1
            Easy to use
          • 1
            Official Linux app
          • 0
            The more the merrier
          CONS OF DROPBOX
          • 3
            Personal vs company account is confusing
          • 1
            Replication kills CPU and battery

          related Dropbox posts

          Shared insights
          on
          Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

          I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

          Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

          See more
          Shared insights
          on
          BoxBoxDropboxDropboxKloudlessKloudless

          Anyone recommend a good connector like Kloudless for connecting a SaaS app to Dropbox/Box etc? Cheers

          See more
          Amazon CloudFront logo

          Amazon CloudFront

          21.4K
          935
          Content delivery with low latency and high data transfer speeds
          21.4K
          935
          PROS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
          • 245
            Fast
          • 166
            Cdn
          • 157
            Compatible with other aws services
          • 125
            Simple
          • 108
            Global
          • 41
            Cheap
          • 36
            Cost-effective
          • 27
            Reliable
          • 19
            One stop solution
          • 9
            Elastic
          • 1
            Object store
          • 1
            HTTP/2 Support
          CONS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
          • 3
            UI could use some work
          • 1
            Invalidations take so long

          related Amazon CloudFront posts

          Russel Werner
          Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 32 upvotes · 2.9M views

          StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

          Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

          #StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

          See more
          Julien DeFrance
          Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 16 upvotes · 3.2M views

          Back in 2014, I was given an opportunity to re-architect SmartZip Analytics platform, and flagship product: SmartTargeting. This is a SaaS software helping real estate professionals keeping up with their prospects and leads in a given neighborhood/territory, finding out (thanks to predictive analytics) who's the most likely to list/sell their home, and running cross-channel marketing automation against them: direct mail, online ads, email... The company also does provide Data APIs to Enterprise customers.

          I had inherited years and years of technical debt and I knew things had to change radically. The first enabler to this was to make use of the cloud and go with AWS, so we would stop re-inventing the wheel, and build around managed/scalable services.

          For the SaaS product, we kept on working with Rails as this was what my team had the most knowledge in. We've however broken up the monolith and decoupled the front-end application from the backend thanks to the use of Rails API so we'd get independently scalable micro-services from now on.

          Our various applications could now be deployed using AWS Elastic Beanstalk so we wouldn't waste any more efforts writing time-consuming Capistrano deployment scripts for instance. Combined with Docker so our application would run within its own container, independently from the underlying host configuration.

          Storage-wise, we went with Amazon S3 and ditched any pre-existing local or network storage people used to deal with in our legacy systems. On the database side: Amazon RDS / MySQL initially. Ultimately migrated to Amazon RDS for Aurora / MySQL when it got released. Once again, here you need a managed service your cloud provider handles for you.

          Future improvements / technology decisions included:

          Caching: Amazon ElastiCache / Memcached CDN: Amazon CloudFront Systems Integration: Segment / Zapier Data-warehousing: Amazon Redshift BI: Amazon Quicksight / Superset Search: Elasticsearch / Amazon Elasticsearch Service / Algolia Monitoring: New Relic

          As our usage grows, patterns changed, and/or our business needs evolved, my role as Engineering Manager then Director of Engineering was also to ensure my team kept on learning and innovating, while delivering on business value.

          One of these innovations was to get ourselves into Serverless : Adopting AWS Lambda was a big step forward. At the time, only available for Node.js (Not Ruby ) but a great way to handle cost efficiency, unpredictable traffic, sudden bursts of traffic... Ultimately you want the whole chain of services involved in a call to be serverless, and that's when we've started leveraging Amazon DynamoDB on these projects so they'd be fully scalable.

          See more
          Akamai logo

          Akamai

          1.9K
          0
          The leading platform for cloud, mobile, media and security across any device, anywhere.
          1.9K
          0
          PROS OF AKAMAI
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF AKAMAI
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Akamai posts

              MaxCDN logo

              MaxCDN

              1.6K
              100
              Our CDN makes your site load faster!
              1.6K
              100
              PROS OF MAXCDN
              • 47
                Easy setup
              • 33
                Speed to my clients
              • 15
                Great service & Customer Support
              • 5
                Shared and Affordable SSL
              CONS OF MAXCDN
                Be the first to leave a con

                related MaxCDN posts

                Justin Dorfman
                Open Source Program Manager at Reblaze · | 4 upvotes · 260.1K views

                When my SSL cert MaxCDN was expiring on my personal site I decided it was a good time to revamp some things. Since GitHub Services is depreciated I can no longer have #CDN cache purges automated among other things. So I decided on the following: GitHub Pages, Netlify, Let's Encrypt and Jekyll. Staying the same was Bootstrap, jQuery, Grunt & #GoogleFonts.

                What's awesome about GitHub Pages is that it has a #CDN (Fastly) built-in and anytime you push to master, it purges the cache instantaneously without you have to do anything special. Netlify is magic, I highly recommend it to anyone using #StaticSiteGenerators.

                For the most part, everything went smoothly. The only things I had issues with were the following:

                • If you want to point www to GitHub Pages you need to rename the repo to www
                • If you edit something in the _config.yml you need to restart bundle exec jekyll s or changes won't show
                • I had to disable the Grunt htmlmin module. I replaced it with Jekyll layout that compresses HTML for #webperf

                Last but certainly not least, I made a donation to Let's Encrypt. If you use their service consider doing it too: https://letsencrypt.org/donate/

                See more
                Todd Gardner

                We migrated the hosting of our CDN, which is used to serve the JavaScript Error collection agent, from Amazon CloudFront to MaxCDN. During our test, we found MaxCDN to be more reliable and less expensive for serving he file.

                The reports and controls were also considerably better.

                See more