Alternatives to Amazon Elastic Transcoder logo

Alternatives to Amazon Elastic Transcoder

AWS Elemental MediaConvert, Zencoder, Google Drive, CloudFlare, and Dropbox are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Amazon Elastic Transcoder.
90
0

What is Amazon Elastic Transcoder and what are its top alternatives?

Amazon Elastic Transcoder is a cloud-based media transcoding service that allows users to convert media files stored in Amazon S3 into various formats for different devices. Key features include support for a wide range of input and output formats, scalability, and integration with other Amazon Web Services. However, limitations include pricing based on usage and potential latency issues.

  1. Zencoder: Zencoder is a cloud-based video encoding service that offers fast transcoding, support for various formats and devices, and scalability. Pros include reliable performance and easy integration, but cons include higher pricing compared to other alternatives.
  2. FFmpeg: FFmpeg is an open-source multimedia framework that provides tools for encoding, decoding, and transcoding various media formats. Key features include wide format support, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness. Pros include customization options and community support, while cons include a steeper learning curve for beginners.
  3. Encoding.com: Encoding.com is a cloud-based media processing service that offers fast transcoding, automation capabilities, and scalability. Pros include a user-friendly interface and support for high-quality output, but cons include pricing based on usage.
  4. Bitmovin: Bitmovin is a cloud-based video encoding service that provides high-quality transcoding, low latency, and adaptive bitrate streaming. Key features include advanced encoding algorithms, scalability, and wide format support. Pros include fast performance and reliability, but cons include higher pricing for premium features.
  5. Telestream Vantage: Telestream Vantage is a media processing platform that offers transcoding, automation, and workflow optimization tools. Pros include high throughput, customization options, and integration with other systems, but cons include a complex setup process.
  6. Cloudflare Stream: Cloudflare Stream is a video streaming service that includes transcoding capabilities, adaptive bitrate streaming, and security features. Key features include fast performance, global reach, and seamless integration with Cloudflare's CDN. Pros include built-in security measures and easy setup, but cons include limited format support.
  7. Wowza Streaming Engine: Wowza Streaming Engine is a media server software that offers transcoding, streaming, and on-demand video delivery. Pros include high-quality output, versatile streaming options, and reliability, but cons include a higher learning curve and potential scalability issues.
  8. Brightcove: Brightcove is a cloud-based video platform that includes transcoding, monetization tools, and analytics capabilities. Key features include easy video management, scalability, and customization options. Pros include robust security measures and user-friendly interface, but cons include pricing based on usage.
  9. Mux Video: Mux Video is an API-driven video encoding service that offers high-quality output, adaptive streaming, and real-time analytics. Pros include ease of integration, fast transcoding speeds, and cost-effectiveness, but cons include limited format support for some features.
  10. Panda: Panda is a cloud-based video encoding service that provides fast transcoding, adaptive streaming, and customization options. Key features include scalability, reliability, and a user-friendly interface. Pros include competitive pricing and seamless integration, but cons include occasional delays in encoding jobs.

Top Alternatives to Amazon Elastic Transcoder

  • AWS Elemental MediaConvert
    AWS Elemental MediaConvert

    AWS Elemental MediaConvert is a file-based video transcoding service with broadcast-grade features. It allows you to easily create video-on-demand (VOD) content for broadcast and multiscreen delivery at scale. ...

  • Zencoder
    Zencoder

    Zencoder downloads the video and converts it to as many formats as you need. Every output is encoded concurrently, with virtually no waiting—whether you do one or one hundred. Zencoder then uploads the resulting videos to a server, CDN, an S3 bucket, or wherever you dictate in your API call. ...

  • Google Drive
    Google Drive

    Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer. ...

  • CloudFlare
    CloudFlare

    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...

  • Dropbox
    Dropbox

    Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more. ...

  • Amazon CloudFront
    Amazon CloudFront

    Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance. ...

  • Akamai
    Akamai

    If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward. ...

  • MaxCDN
    MaxCDN

    The MaxCDN Content Delivery Network efficiently delivers your site’s static file through hundreds of servers instead of slogging through a single host. This "smart route" technology distributes your content to your visitors via the city closest to them. ...

Amazon Elastic Transcoder alternatives & related posts

AWS Elemental MediaConvert logo

AWS Elemental MediaConvert

42
71
0
Process video files and clips to prepare on-demand content for distribution or archiving
42
71
+ 1
0
PROS OF AWS ELEMENTAL MEDIACONVERT
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF AWS ELEMENTAL MEDIACONVERT
      Be the first to leave a con

      related AWS Elemental MediaConvert posts

      Zencoder logo

      Zencoder

      29
      37
      11
      Cloud-based video and audio encoding product suite
      29
      37
      + 1
      11
      PROS OF ZENCODER
      • 7
        Easy setup
      • 3
        Flexible S3 integration
      • 1
        Good customer support
      CONS OF ZENCODER
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Zencoder posts

        Alex Wendland

        We were looking for a versatile #MediaTranscoding service for #video to convert TV shows and movies from large content providers into web #VideoStreaming formats. These content providers gave us files ranging from Apple ProRes to h.264, with file sizes from 1 GB to 100 GB, and we needed a tool that could cope with all of it. We looked at Amazon Elastic Transcoder and Zencoder, and eventually chose @Zencoder because it had support for every format we needed, good handling of sound channel remapping, and a clear UI with fast processing times. We automated our usage with it by writing a simple Python script to interact with it's API, and hosted the input and output AV files on Amazon S3, which it could easily talk to. So far we've converted 15 TB representing several thousand files using the service and are quite happy!

        See more
        Google Drive logo

        Google Drive

        81.8K
        68.1K
        2.1K
        A safe place for all your files
        81.8K
        68.1K
        + 1
        2.1K
        PROS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
        • 505
          Easy to use
        • 326
          Gmail integration
        • 312
          Enough free space
        • 268
          Collaboration
        • 249
          Stable service
        • 128
          Desktop and mobile apps
        • 97
          Offline sync
        • 79
          Apps
        • 74
          15 gb storage
        • 50
          Add-ons
        • 9
          Integrates well
        • 6
          Easy to use
        • 3
          Simple back-up tool
        • 2
          Amazing
        • 2
          Beautiful
        • 2
          Fast upload speeds
        • 2
          The more the merrier
        • 2
          So easy
        • 2
          Wonderful
        • 2
          Linux terminal transfer tools
        • 2
          It has grown to a stable in the cloud office
        • 1
          UI
        • 1
          Windows desktop
        • 1
          G Suite integration
        CONS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
        • 7
          Organization via web ui sucks
        • 2
          Not a real database

        related Google Drive posts

        Tom Klein

        Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

        See more
        Shared insights
        on
        Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

        I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

        Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

        See more
        CloudFlare logo

        CloudFlare

        76.5K
        22.5K
        1.8K
        The Web Performance & Security Company.
        76.5K
        22.5K
        + 1
        1.8K
        PROS OF CLOUDFLARE
        • 424
          Easy setup, great cdn
        • 277
          Free ssl
        • 199
          Easy setup
        • 190
          Security
        • 180
          Ssl
        • 98
          Great cdn
        • 77
          Optimizer
        • 71
          Simple
        • 44
          Great UI
        • 28
          Great js cdn
        • 12
          Apps
        • 12
          HTTP/2 Support
        • 12
          DNS Analytics
        • 12
          AutoMinify
        • 9
          Rocket Loader
        • 9
          Ipv6
        • 9
          Easy
        • 8
          IPv6 "One Click"
        • 8
          Fantastic CDN service
        • 7
          DNSSEC
        • 7
          Nice DNS
        • 7
          SSHFP
        • 7
          Free GeoIP
        • 7
          Amazing performance
        • 7
          API
        • 7
          Cheapest SSL
        • 6
          SPDY
        • 6
          Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
        • 5
          Ubuntu
        • 5
          Asynchronous resource loading
        • 4
          Global Load Balancing
        • 4
          Performance
        • 4
          Easy Use
        • 3
          CDN
        • 2
          Registrar
        • 2
          Support for SSHFP records
        • 1
          Web3
        • 1
          Прохси
        • 1
          HTTPS3/Quic
        CONS OF CLOUDFLARE
        • 2
          No support for SSHFP records
        • 2
          Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits

        related CloudFlare posts

        Tom Klein

        Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

        See more
        Johnny Bell

        When I first built my portfolio I used GitHub for the source control and deployed directly to Netlify on a push to master. This was a perfect setup, I didn't need any knowledge about #DevOps or anything, it was all just done for me.

        One of the issues I had with Netlify was I wanted to gzip my JavaScript files, I had this setup in my #Webpack file, however Netlify didn't offer an easy way to set this.

        Over the weekend I decided I wanted to know more about how #DevOps worked so I decided to switch from Netlify to Amazon S3. Instead of creating any #Git Webhooks I decided to use Buddy for my pipeline and to run commands. Buddy is a fantastic tool, very easy to setup builds, copying the files to my Amazon S3 bucket, then running some #AWS console commands to set the content-encoding of the JavaScript files. - Buddy is also free if you only have a few pipelines, so I didn't need to pay anything 🤙🏻.

        When I made these changes I also wanted to monitor my code, and make sure I was keeping up with the best practices so I implemented Code Climate to look over my code and tell me where there code smells, issues, and other issues I've been super happy with it so far, on the free tier so its also free.

        I did plan on using Amazon CloudFront for my SSL and cacheing, however it was overly complex to setup and it costs money. So I decided to go with the free tier of CloudFlare and it is amazing, best choice I've made for caching / SSL in a long time.

        See more
        Dropbox logo

        Dropbox

        23.3K
        18.2K
        1.7K
        Build the power of Dropbox into your apps
        23.3K
        18.2K
        + 1
        1.7K
        PROS OF DROPBOX
        • 434
          Easy to work with
        • 256
          Free
        • 216
          Popular
        • 176
          Shared file hosting
        • 167
          'just works'
        • 100
          No brainer
        • 79
          Integration with external services
        • 76
          Simple
        • 49
          Good api
        • 38
          Least cost (free) for the basic needs case
        • 11
          It just works
        • 8
          Convenient
        • 7
          Accessible from all of my devices
        • 5
          Command Line client
        • 4
          Synchronizing laptop and desktop - work anywhere
        • 4
          Can even be used by your grandma
        • 3
          Reliable
        • 3
          Sync API
        • 3
          Mac app
        • 3
          Cross platform app
        • 2
          Ability to pay monthly without losing your files
        • 2
          Delta synchronization
        • 2
          Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliably
        • 2
          Backups, local and cloud
        • 2
          Extended version history
        • 2
          Beautiful UI
        • 1
          YC Company
        • 1
          What a beautiful app
        • 1
          Easy/no setup
        • 1
          So easy
        • 1
          The more the merrier
        • 1
          Easy to work with
        • 1
          For when client needs file without opening firewall
        • 1
          Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliabl
        • 1
          Easy to use
        • 1
          Official Linux app
        • 0
          The more the merrier
        CONS OF DROPBOX
        • 3
          Personal vs company account is confusing
        • 1
          Replication kills CPU and battery

        related Dropbox posts

        Shared insights
        on
        Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

        I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

        Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

        See more
        Shared insights
        on
        BoxBoxDropboxDropboxKloudlessKloudless

        Anyone recommend a good connector like Kloudless for connecting a SaaS app to Dropbox/Box etc? Cheers

        See more
        Amazon CloudFront logo

        Amazon CloudFront

        21.3K
        10.7K
        935
        Content delivery with low latency and high data transfer speeds
        21.3K
        10.7K
        + 1
        935
        PROS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
        • 245
          Fast
        • 166
          Cdn
        • 157
          Compatible with other aws services
        • 125
          Simple
        • 108
          Global
        • 41
          Cheap
        • 36
          Cost-effective
        • 27
          Reliable
        • 19
          One stop solution
        • 9
          Elastic
        • 1
          Object store
        • 1
          HTTP/2 Support
        CONS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
        • 3
          UI could use some work
        • 1
          Invalidations take so long

        related Amazon CloudFront posts

        Russel Werner
        Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 32 upvotes · 2.8M views

        StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

        Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

        #StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

        See more
        Julien DeFrance
        Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 16 upvotes · 3.2M views

        Back in 2014, I was given an opportunity to re-architect SmartZip Analytics platform, and flagship product: SmartTargeting. This is a SaaS software helping real estate professionals keeping up with their prospects and leads in a given neighborhood/territory, finding out (thanks to predictive analytics) who's the most likely to list/sell their home, and running cross-channel marketing automation against them: direct mail, online ads, email... The company also does provide Data APIs to Enterprise customers.

        I had inherited years and years of technical debt and I knew things had to change radically. The first enabler to this was to make use of the cloud and go with AWS, so we would stop re-inventing the wheel, and build around managed/scalable services.

        For the SaaS product, we kept on working with Rails as this was what my team had the most knowledge in. We've however broken up the monolith and decoupled the front-end application from the backend thanks to the use of Rails API so we'd get independently scalable micro-services from now on.

        Our various applications could now be deployed using AWS Elastic Beanstalk so we wouldn't waste any more efforts writing time-consuming Capistrano deployment scripts for instance. Combined with Docker so our application would run within its own container, independently from the underlying host configuration.

        Storage-wise, we went with Amazon S3 and ditched any pre-existing local or network storage people used to deal with in our legacy systems. On the database side: Amazon RDS / MySQL initially. Ultimately migrated to Amazon RDS for Aurora / MySQL when it got released. Once again, here you need a managed service your cloud provider handles for you.

        Future improvements / technology decisions included:

        Caching: Amazon ElastiCache / Memcached CDN: Amazon CloudFront Systems Integration: Segment / Zapier Data-warehousing: Amazon Redshift BI: Amazon Quicksight / Superset Search: Elasticsearch / Amazon Elasticsearch Service / Algolia Monitoring: New Relic

        As our usage grows, patterns changed, and/or our business needs evolved, my role as Engineering Manager then Director of Engineering was also to ensure my team kept on learning and innovating, while delivering on business value.

        One of these innovations was to get ourselves into Serverless : Adopting AWS Lambda was a big step forward. At the time, only available for Node.js (Not Ruby ) but a great way to handle cost efficiency, unpredictable traffic, sudden bursts of traffic... Ultimately you want the whole chain of services involved in a call to be serverless, and that's when we've started leveraging Amazon DynamoDB on these projects so they'd be fully scalable.

        See more
        Akamai logo

        Akamai

        1.9K
        439
        0
        The leading platform for cloud, mobile, media and security across any device, anywhere.
        1.9K
        439
        + 1
        0
        PROS OF AKAMAI
          Be the first to leave a pro
          CONS OF AKAMAI
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Akamai posts

            MaxCDN logo

            MaxCDN

            1.6K
            553
            100
            Our CDN makes your site load faster!
            1.6K
            553
            + 1
            100
            PROS OF MAXCDN
            • 47
              Easy setup
            • 33
              Speed to my clients
            • 15
              Great service & Customer Support
            • 5
              Shared and Affordable SSL
            CONS OF MAXCDN
              Be the first to leave a con

              related MaxCDN posts

              Justin Dorfman
              Open Source Program Manager at Reblaze · | 4 upvotes · 243.1K views

              When my SSL cert MaxCDN was expiring on my personal site I decided it was a good time to revamp some things. Since GitHub Services is depreciated I can no longer have #CDN cache purges automated among other things. So I decided on the following: GitHub Pages, Netlify, Let's Encrypt and Jekyll. Staying the same was Bootstrap, jQuery, Grunt & #GoogleFonts.

              What's awesome about GitHub Pages is that it has a #CDN (Fastly) built-in and anytime you push to master, it purges the cache instantaneously without you have to do anything special. Netlify is magic, I highly recommend it to anyone using #StaticSiteGenerators.

              For the most part, everything went smoothly. The only things I had issues with were the following:

              • If you want to point www to GitHub Pages you need to rename the repo to www
              • If you edit something in the _config.yml you need to restart bundle exec jekyll s or changes won't show
              • I had to disable the Grunt htmlmin module. I replaced it with Jekyll layout that compresses HTML for #webperf

              Last but certainly not least, I made a donation to Let's Encrypt. If you use their service consider doing it too: https://letsencrypt.org/donate/

              See more
              Todd Gardner

              We migrated the hosting of our CDN, which is used to serve the JavaScript Error collection agent, from Amazon CloudFront to MaxCDN. During our test, we found MaxCDN to be more reliable and less expensive for serving he file.

              The reports and controls were also considerably better.

              See more