Gridsome vs Jekyll

Overview

Jekyll

Stacks2.0K

Followers1.4K

Votes230

GitHub Stars51.0K

Forks10.2K

Gridsome

Stacks160

Followers295

Votes51

GitHub Stars8.5K

Forks481

Gridsome vs Jekyll: What are the differences?

Development Stack: Gridsome is built on top of Vue.js and uses GraphQL to query data, while Jekyll is built on Ruby and uses Liquid for templating. This difference in development stack leads to variations in the way plugins, themes, and configurations are handled between the two static site generators.
Performance: Gridsome generates static files at build time, which results in faster loading times and better performance compared to Jekyll, which generates files at runtime. This difference is crucial for websites that prioritize performance and SEO.
Ease of Use: Gridsome simplifies the process of building and deploying static websites with its Vue.js-based architecture and robust documentation. On the other hand, Jekyll's learning curve might be steeper for beginners due to its Ruby-based infrastructure.
Plugin Ecosystem: Gridsome has a growing ecosystem of plugins that enhance functionality and provide additional features, leveraging the power of Vue.js and GraphQL. Conversely, Jekyll, though it has a significant number of plugins, may not offer as much flexibility and modern capabilities as Gridsome.
Content Mesh Integration: Gridsome natively supports content mesh integration, allowing users to pull content from various sources like headless CMS, databases, or REST APIs. Jekyll, while it can integrate with external data sources, might require more manual configuration and effort to achieve similar results.
Dynamic Page Generation: Gridsome excels in dynamic page generation, enabling users to create intricate dynamic websites with ease using GraphQL queries. In contrast, Jekyll focuses more on static site generation, which might limit the dynamic capabilities of websites built with it.

In Summary, Gridsome and Jekyll differ in their development stack, performance, ease of use, plugin ecosystem, content mesh integration, and dynamic page generation capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jekyll, Gridsome

Manuel

Frontend Engineer at BI X

Jul 22, 2020

Decided

As a Frontend Developer I wanted something simple to generate static websites with technology I am familiar with. GatsbyJS was in the stack I am familiar with, does not need any other languages / package managers and allows quick content deployment in pure HTML or Markdown (what you prefer for a project). It also does not require you to understand a theming engine if you need a custom design.

178k views178k

Comments

Kazim

Founder & Developer at Devkind

May 13, 2020

Needs advice

Fastest and quickest way to do static HTML site which is extremely fast? Do you consider above tools or is there anything more quicker or better? This is just a one time one pager site for now, no backend required. I might have such projects in future, having something to get familiar with which can immediately come into action to develop would be great advise!

53.5k views53.5k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jekyll	Gridsome
Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.	Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again.
Simple - No more databases, comment moderation, or pesky updates to install—just your content.;Static - Markdown (or Textile), Liquid, HTML & CSS go in. Static sites come out ready for deployment.;Blog-aware - Permalinks, categories, pages, posts, and custom layouts are all first-class citizens here.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 51.0K	GitHub Stars 8.5K
GitHub Forks 10.2K	GitHub Forks 481
Stacks 2.0K	Stacks 160
Followers 1.4K	Followers 295
Votes 230	Votes 51
Pros & Cons
Pros 74 Github pages integration 54 Open source 37 It's slick, customisable and hackerish 24 Easy to deploy 23 Straightforward cms for the hacker mindset Cons 4 Build time increases exponentially as site grows 2 Lack of developments lately 1 Og doesn't work with postings dynamically	Pros 16 Vuejs 10 GraphQL 6 Starter kit as a base for new project 5 Reusable components (Vue) 4 Open source Cons 1 Still young 1 Open source
Integrations
No integrations available	Node.js Drupal Vue.js prismic.io WordPress Webpack GraphQL Contentful GraphCMS

What are some alternatives to Jekyll, Gridsome?

Hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Gatsby

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

Hexo

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

Middleman

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

Pelican

Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.

DocPad

Empower your website frontends with layouts, meta-data, pre-processors (markdown, jade, coffeescript, etc.), partials, skeletons, file watching, querying, and an amazing plugin system. DocPad will streamline your web development process allowing you to craft full-featured websites quicker than ever before.

Metalsmith

In Metalsmith, all of the logic is handled by plugins. You simply chain them together. Since everything is a plugin, the core library is actually just an abstraction for manipulating a directory of files.

11ty

A simpler static site generator. An alternative to Jekyll. Written in JavaScript. Transforms a directory of templates (of varying types) into HTML. Works with HTML, Markdown, Liquid, Nunjucks, Handlebars, Mustache, EJS, Haml, Pug, and JavaScript Template Literals.

MkDocs

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

VuePress

A minimalistic static site generator with a Vue-powered theming system, and a default theme optimized for writing technical documentation. It was created to support the documentation needs of Vue's own sub projects.

Related Comparisons

Gridsome vs Jekyll: What are the differences?

Development Stack: Gridsome is built on top of Vue.js and uses GraphQL to query data, while Jekyll is built on Ruby and uses Liquid for templating. This difference in development stack leads to variations in the way plugins, themes, and configurations are handled between the two static site generators.
Performance: Gridsome generates static files at build time, which results in faster loading times and better performance compared to Jekyll, which generates files at runtime. This difference is crucial for websites that prioritize performance and SEO.
Ease of Use: Gridsome simplifies the process of building and deploying static websites with its Vue.js-based architecture and robust documentation. On the other hand, Jekyll's learning curve might be steeper for beginners due to its Ruby-based infrastructure.
Plugin Ecosystem: Gridsome has a growing ecosystem of plugins that enhance functionality and provide additional features, leveraging the power of Vue.js and GraphQL. Conversely, Jekyll, though it has a significant number of plugins, may not offer as much flexibility and modern capabilities as Gridsome.
Content Mesh Integration: Gridsome natively supports content mesh integration, allowing users to pull content from various sources like headless CMS, databases, or REST APIs. Jekyll, while it can integrate with external data sources, might require more manual configuration and effort to achieve similar results.
Dynamic Page Generation: Gridsome excels in dynamic page generation, enabling users to create intricate dynamic websites with ease using GraphQL queries. In contrast, Jekyll focuses more on static site generation, which might limit the dynamic capabilities of websites built with it.

In Summary, Gridsome and Jekyll differ in their development stack, performance, ease of use, plugin ecosystem, content mesh integration, and dynamic page generation capabilities.

Gridsome vs Jekyll

Overview