Guardian vs OpenID Connect

Overview

Guardian

Stacks7

Followers18

Votes0

OpenID Connect

Stacks233

Followers133

Votes0

Guardian vs OpenID Connect: What are the differences?

Authentication Protocol: The key difference between Guardian and OpenID Connect lies in their authentication protocol. Guardian uses JWT (JSON Web Tokens) for authentication, which provides a compact and self-contained way for securely transmitting information between parties. On the other hand, OpenID Connect utilizes OAuth 2.0, which is an authorization framework that enables third-party applications to obtain limited access to a HTTP service.
User Identity Verification: Guardian primarily focuses on verifying a user's identity and granting access based on the provided authentication token. In contrast, OpenID Connect goes a step further by providing an identity layer on top of OAuth 2.0, enabling clients to verify the user's identity directly from the ID token provided by the OpenID Connect provider.
Token Issuance: Another significant difference is in how tokens are issued between Guardian and OpenID Connect. Guardian issues tokens directly from the authentication server, while OpenID Connect uses ID tokens issued by the OpenID provider, which can then be validated by the client application.
Scalability and Flexibility: Guardian is known for its simplicity and lightweight nature, making it a more scalable option for smaller applications or services. On the other hand, OpenID Connect offers more complex features and configurations, providing greater flexibility for larger and more diverse ecosystems.
User Consent Flow: When it comes to user consent flow, Guardian typically follows a more straightforward approach where users consent to the application's permissions once during authentication. In contrast, OpenID Connect supports dynamic consent management, allowing users to manage and adjust their consent settings for different applications and resources.
Supported Ecosystems: While Guardian is widely used in JavaScript environments and frameworks due to its simplicity and ease of integration, OpenID Connect has broader support across various programming languages and platforms, making it a more versatile option for diverse development environments.

In Summary, Guardian and OpenID Connect differ in their authentication protocol, user identity verification, token issuance, scalability, user consent flow, and supported ecosystems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Guardian	OpenID Connect
Avoid dealing with OAuth logic in your code, and spend more time creating your product. Guardian reduces the OAuth footprint in your code to a single request. Built with modularity in mind, Guardian leverages plugins to handle OAuth flows, should you encounter a flow that Guardian doesn't handle, create a small flow plugin to do so and carry on. Guardian comes with 5 pre-made plugins that cover 99% of OAuth services.	It is a simple identity layer on top of the OAuth 2.0 protocol. It allows Clients to verify the identity of the End-User based on the authentication performed by an Authorization Server, as well as to obtain basic profile information about the End-User in an interoperable and REST-like manner.
Perfect for both production and testing;Guardian is centralized and easily configurable to allow multiple environments giving you the flexibility you need	-
Statistics
Stacks 7	Stacks 233
Followers 18	Followers 133
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	JSON Web Token Spring Security OAuth2

What are some alternatives to Guardian, OpenID Connect?

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Guardian vs OpenID Connect: What are the differences?

Authentication Protocol: The key difference between Guardian and OpenID Connect lies in their authentication protocol. Guardian uses JWT (JSON Web Tokens) for authentication, which provides a compact and self-contained way for securely transmitting information between parties. On the other hand, OpenID Connect utilizes OAuth 2.0, which is an authorization framework that enables third-party applications to obtain limited access to a HTTP service.
User Identity Verification: Guardian primarily focuses on verifying a user's identity and granting access based on the provided authentication token. In contrast, OpenID Connect goes a step further by providing an identity layer on top of OAuth 2.0, enabling clients to verify the user's identity directly from the ID token provided by the OpenID Connect provider.
Token Issuance: Another significant difference is in how tokens are issued between Guardian and OpenID Connect. Guardian issues tokens directly from the authentication server, while OpenID Connect uses ID tokens issued by the OpenID provider, which can then be validated by the client application.
Scalability and Flexibility: Guardian is known for its simplicity and lightweight nature, making it a more scalable option for smaller applications or services. On the other hand, OpenID Connect offers more complex features and configurations, providing greater flexibility for larger and more diverse ecosystems.
User Consent Flow: When it comes to user consent flow, Guardian typically follows a more straightforward approach where users consent to the application's permissions once during authentication. In contrast, OpenID Connect supports dynamic consent management, allowing users to manage and adjust their consent settings for different applications and resources.
Supported Ecosystems: While Guardian is widely used in JavaScript environments and frameworks due to its simplicity and ease of integration, OpenID Connect has broader support across various programming languages and platforms, making it a more versatile option for diverse development environments.

In Summary, Guardian and OpenID Connect differ in their authentication protocol, user identity verification, token issuance, scalability, user consent flow, and supported ecosystems.

Guardian vs OpenID Connect

Overview