StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Guardian vs sso

Guardian vs sso

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Guardian
Guardian
Stacks7
Followers18
Votes0
sso
sso
Stacks38
Followers89
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.1K
Forks191

Guardian vs sso: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Architecture: The key difference between Guardian and SSO lies in their architecture. Guardian typically uses a perimeter security approach with a focus on protecting the network and system infrastructure. On the other hand, SSO (Single Sign-On) is a centralized authentication system that allows users to access multiple applications with a single set of login credentials.

  2. Scope: Another significant difference is the scope of functionality provided by Guardian and SSO. Guardian primarily focuses on protecting the network against external threats and unauthorized access, while SSO streamlines the authentication process for users by eliminating the need to log in separately to each application.

  3. User Experience: When it comes to user experience, Guardian may introduce additional security measures such as multi-factor authentication or VPN access, which can sometimes lead to a more complex user experience. SSO, on the other hand, simplifies the login process for users by providing a seamless experience across multiple applications.

  4. Integration: In terms of integration, Guardian is typically integrated at the network level to protect against various threats, while SSO is integrated at the application level to enable seamless access to multiple applications with a single set of credentials. The focus of integration differs based on the purpose of each solution.

  5. Management: Guardian and SSO also differ in terms of management capabilities. Guardian is more focused on network security management, including monitoring and responding to external threats, while SSO allows for centralized user management, authentication, and access control across multiple applications.

  6. Scalability: Lastly, the scalability of Guardian and SSO also varies. While Guardian is primarily focused on securing the network infrastructure, its scalability may be limited to the network size and capacity. SSO, on the other hand, can be scaled to accommodate a larger number of users and applications while maintaining a streamlined authentication process.

In Summary, Guardian and SSO differ in architecture, scope, user experience, integration, management, and scalability, each serving a distinct purpose in securing networks and simplifying user authentication across multiple applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Guardian
Guardian
sso
sso

Avoid dealing with OAuth logic in your code, and spend more time creating your product. Guardian reduces the OAuth footprint in your code to a single request. Built with modularity in mind, Guardian leverages plugins to handle OAuth flows, should you encounter a flow that Guardian doesn't handle, create a small flow plugin to do so and carry on. Guardian comes with 5 pre-made plugins that cover 99% of OAuth services.

The authentication and authorization system BuzzFeed developed to provide a secure, single sign-on experience for access to the many internal web apps used by our employees.

Perfect for both production and testing;Guardian is centralized and easily configurable to allow multiple environments giving you the flexibility you need
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
191
Stacks
7
Stacks
38
Followers
18
Followers
89
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to Guardian, sso?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope