StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. Webpack vs Webpacker vs gulp

Webpack vs Webpacker vs gulp

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

gulp
gulp
Stacks15.3K
Followers9.1K
Votes1.7K
GitHub Stars33.0K
Forks4.2K
Webpack
Webpack
Stacks45.0K
Followers28.1K
Votes752
GitHub Stars65.7K
Forks9.2K
Webpacker
Webpacker
Stacks204
Followers48
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.3K
Forks1.5K

Webpack vs Webpacker vs gulp: What are the differences?

<The introduction to the comparison between Webpack, Webpacker, and Gulp>

  1. Architecture: Webpack is a module bundler for modern JavaScript applications, whereas Webpacker is a gem that integrates Webpack with Rails apps. Gulp is a task runner that helps automate various tasks such as minification, concatenation, and more.
  2. Configuration: Webpack allows for extensive configuration options, making it highly customizable for different project needs. Webpacker simplifies this process by providing default configurations for Rails applications. Gulp also offers configuration options but is generally considered more straightforward and easier to set up compared to Webpack.
  3. Plugins and Ecosystem: Webpack has a vast ecosystem of plugins that extend its functionality and cater to different use cases. Webpacker leverages these plugins but focuses more on integrating Webpack specifically with Rails. Gulp also has a rich ecosystem of plugins, but they are typically more focused on enhancing build processes rather than module bundling.
  4. Code Splitting: Webpack excels in code splitting, allowing developers to split their code into bundles that load efficiently. Webpacker works well with code splitting too but takes a Rails-centric approach to optimizing asset loading. While Gulp can achieve code splitting, it requires more configuration and setup compared to Webpack and Webpacker.
  5. Hot Module Replacement: Webpack provides a feature called Hot Module Replacement, which allows for real-time updates in the browser without a full page reload. Webpacker integrates this feature for Rails developers to enhance their development workflow. Gulp, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for Hot Module Replacement, requiring additional tools or configurations to achieve similar functionality.
  6. Community Adoption: Webpack has gained significant community adoption and is widely used for modern JavaScript projects. Webpacker, being Rails-specific, is embraced by the Rails community but may not have as broad usage outside this environment. Gulp, although popular in the past, has seen a decline in usage with the rise of more modern tools like Webpack.

In Summary, Webpack, Webpacker, and Gulp each offer distinct characteristics in terms of architecture, configuration, ecosystem, code splitting, hot module replacement, and community adoption, catering to different needs and preferences in web development workflows.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

gulp
gulp
Webpack
Webpack
Webpacker
Webpacker

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Webpacker makes it easy to use the JavaScript preprocessor and bundler Webpack to manage application-like JavaScript in Rails. It coexists with the asset pipeline, as the purpose is only to use Webpack for app-like JavaScript, not images, css, or even JavaScript Sprinkles (that all continues to live in app/assets).

By preferring code over configuration, gulp keeps simple things simple and makes complex tasks manageable.;By harnessing the power of node's streams you get fast builds that don't write intermediary files to disk.;gulp's strict plugin guidelines assure plugins stay simple and work the way you expect.;With a minimal API surface, you can pick up gulp in no time. Your build works just like you envision it: a series of streaming pipes.
Bundles ES Modules, CommonJS, and AMD modules (even combined); Can create a single bundle or multiple chunks that are asynchronously loaded at runtime (to reduce initial loading time); Dependencies are resolved during compilation, reducing the runtime size; Loaders can preprocess files while compiling, e.g. TypeScript to JavaScript, Handlebars strings to compiled functions, images to Base64, etc; Highly modular plugin system to do whatever else your application requires
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
33.0K
GitHub Stars
65.7K
GitHub Stars
5.3K
GitHub Forks
4.2K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
15.3K
Stacks
45.0K
Stacks
204
Followers
9.1K
Followers
28.1K
Followers
48
Votes
1.7K
Votes
752
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 451
    Build speed
  • 277
    Readable
  • 244
    Code-over-configuration
  • 210
    Open source
  • 175
    Node streams
Pros
  • 309
    Most powerful bundler
  • 182
    Built-in dev server with livereload
  • 142
    Can handle all types of assets
  • 87
    Easy configuration
  • 22
    Laravel-mix
Cons
  • 15
    Hard to configure
  • 5
    No clear direction
  • 2
    SystemJS integration is quite lackluster
  • 2
    Spaghetti-Code out of the box
  • 2
    Fire and Forget mentality of Core-Developers
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript
Rails
Rails

What are some alternatives to gulp, Webpack, Webpacker?

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Backpack

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

Vite

Vite

It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.

Pingy CLI

Pingy CLI

Gulp and Grunt and other heavyweight build tools are great for complicated build workflows. Sometimes you want something simpler that doesn't take lots of configuration to get up and running. That's Pingy CLI.

Microbundle

Microbundle

Zero-configuration bundler for tiny modules, powered by Rollup.

System.js

System.js

It is a Universal Module Loader for JavaScript. If you've used RequireJs or a CommonJs bundler in the past, you have probably created modules.Configurable module loader enabling dynamic ES module workflows in browsers and NodeJS.

Esbuild

Esbuild

It is an extremely fast JavaScript and CSS bundler and minifier. Current build tools for the web are 10-100x slower than they could be. The main goal of this project is to bring about a new era of build tool performance, and create an easy-to-use modern bundler along the way.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana