1. Ease of Use: Helm simplifies the package management and deployment process in Kubernetes by providing a templating mechanism and a command-line interface for installing applications. On the other hand, Jib streamlines the container image building process by directly building images from a Java project without the need for Dockerfiles or manual configuration.

2. Integration with Build Process: Helm integrates well with the overall deployment process in Kubernetes. It allows developers to define and manage application configurations and dependencies through a single chart. Conversely, Jib integrates seamlessly with the Java build tooling (e.g., Maven or Gradle) and can be easily incorporated into the existing build process without making significant changes.

3. Build Speed: Helm relies on the Kubernetes API server and the Helm Tiller server for deploying applications, which can sometimes result in a slower deployment process. In contrast, Jib focuses on incremental builds and only pushes the necessary layers to the registry, resulting in faster image building and deployment times.

4. Generated Artifacts: Helm generates manifest files in YAML format that describe the Kubernetes resources needed to deploy an application. These manifest files can be version controlled and modified as needed. Jib, on the other hand, generates fully-formed container images that can be directly pushed to a container registry. This allows for greater flexibility and reproducibility in the deployment process.

5. Community Support: Helm has a large and active community of users and contributors, offering a wide range of charts and plugins that can be used to simplify the deployment of various applications on Kubernetes. Jib, although gaining popularity, has a smaller community compared to Helm.

6. Scope of Use: Helm is specifically designed for packaging, deploying, and managing applications on Kubernetes. It provides features for managing release versions, dependency resolution, and rollbacks. Jib, on the other hand, is primarily focused on building container images for Java applications and does not have the same level of advanced deployment management features as Helm.

In Summary, Helm simplifies the package management and deployment process in Kubernetes, while Jib streamlines the container image building process for Java applications without the need for Dockerfiles or manual configuration. Helm has a larger community and offers more advanced deployment management features, whereas Jib focuses on faster image building and integration with existing build processes.