Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Helm vs K9s: What are the differences?
Helm and K9s are both tools commonly used in the world of Kubernetes, but they serve different purposes and have distinct functionalities. In this markdown, we will outline the key differences between Helm and K9s.
Installation: Helm is a package manager for Kubernetes that allows users to define, install, and manage applications on a Kubernetes cluster. It is installed both on the local machine and on the Kubernetes cluster. On the other hand, K9s is a command-line interface (CLI) tool that provides a visual, terminal-based interface for managing and troubleshooting Kubernetes clusters. It is only installed on the local machine and does not require any installation on the cluster itself.
Usage: Helm provides a higher-level, package-centric approach to managing Kubernetes resources. It uses charts, which are packages of pre-configured Kubernetes resources, to deploy applications onto a cluster. Helm allows users to install, upgrade, and uninstall applications using commands and values files to customize the application's configuration. K9s, on the other hand, provides a cluster-centric view and allows users to interact with different Kubernetes resources like pods, services, deployments, and others directly from the terminal. It provides an intuitive and efficient way to navigate, inspect, and monitor the cluster in real-time.
Customization: Helm allows users to customize the deployment of an application by providing values files that contain configuration options for the different Kubernetes resources in the chart. These values can be easily modified during installation or upgrade to tailor the application to specific needs. K9s, on the other hand, does not involve customization of application deployment but provides advanced filtering, searching, and sorting capabilities to help users explore and troubleshoot the cluster more effectively.
Management of Dependencies: Helm allows users to define dependencies between applications using charts and track them using the requirements.yaml file. This allows for the management of complex applications that depend on multiple components. K9s, on the other hand, focuses on providing a comprehensive view of the cluster and does not have built-in functionality for managing dependencies between applications.
GUI vs CLI: Helm can be used both through the command-line interface (CLI) and through the Helm graphical user interface (GUI) called Helm Classic. This provides flexibility for users who prefer a visual interface for managing applications on Kubernetes. K9s, on the other hand, is primarily a CLI tool and does not provide a graphical interface.
Community Support: Helm has a larger and more established community compared to K9s. This means that there are more resources, documentation, and community support available for Helm compared to K9s. Helm also has an extensive library of existing charts available for popular applications, making it easier for users to deploy and manage these applications on Kubernetes.
In summary, Helm is a package manager for Kubernetes that allows users to easily deploy and manage applications on a cluster, while K9s provides a terminal-based interface for efficiently navigating and troubleshooting a Kubernetes cluster. Helm focuses on application deployment and management with extensive customization options, while K9s provides a comprehensive view of the cluster for efficient cluster administration and monitoring.
Pros of Helm
- Infrastructure as code8
- Open source6
- Easy setup2
- Support1
- Testability and reproducibility1
Pros of K9s
- Nice UI and fast way to manage my kubernetes clusters2