StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Helm Charts
  5. Helm vs Kopf

Helm vs Kopf

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Helm
Helm
Stacks1.4K
Followers911
Votes18
Kopf
Kopf
Stacks2
Followers3
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.5K
Forks180

Helm vs Kopf: What are the differences?

  1. Helm: Helm is a package manager for Kubernetes that simplifies the deployment and management of applications. It uses a packaging format called charts, which are collections of YAML files that describe a set of Kubernetes resources. Helm allows for easy installation, upgrade, and rollback of applications, making it a popular choice for managing complex deployments.

  2. Kopf: Kopf is a Kubernetes operator framework that helps in creating and managing custom controllers for your applications. It provides a higher-level API and a set of utilities to simplify the development of operators. Kopf allows operators to react to the lifecycle events of Kubernetes resources and perform custom actions, making it useful for automation and customization of application behavior in Kubernetes.

  3. Difference 1: Chart-based vs. Operator-based: The key difference between Helm and Kopf lies in their approach to managing applications in Kubernetes. Helm focuses on packaging and deploying applications using charts, which are more suitable for managing application configurations and resources. On the other hand, Kopf focuses on creating custom controllers (operators) to automate and manage application behavior based on Kubernetes resource events.

  4. Difference 2: Packaging vs. Automation: Helm's main focus is on packaging applications and managing their lifecycle, including installation, upgrade, and rollback. It provides a unified way to package and share applications, making it easier for developers to distribute and deploy applications in Kubernetes. In contrast, Kopf's main focus is on automation and customization of application behavior using custom controllers. It provides higher-level APIs and utilities to simplify the development of operators, enabling developers to define complex automation logic.

  5. Difference 3: Resource vs. Behavior Management: Helm primarily focuses on managing Kubernetes resources such as deployments, services, and configmaps, allowing for easy management of application configurations. It provides tools to template and manage these resources, making it easier to deploy and upgrade applications. In contrast, Kopf focuses on managing the behavior and automation of applications based on Kubernetes resource events. It allows developers to define custom actions and reactions to resource events, enabling advanced automation and customization.

  6. Difference 4: Central vs. Decentralized: Helm follows a centralized approach to managing applications, where a central Helm repository is used to store and distribute charts. Helm CLI interacts with this centralized repository to fetch and install applications. Kopf, on the other hand, follows a decentralized approach, as it is embedded within the Kubernetes cluster and operates directly on the Kubernetes API. Operators developed using Kopf are deployed and managed within the cluster, without the need for a centralized repository.

In Summary, Helm focuses on packaging and managing applications using charts, while Kopf focuses on creating custom controllers to automate and customize application behavior in Kubernetes. Helm is more suitable for managing application configurations and resources, while Kopf is more focused on automation and customization of behavior based on Kubernetes resource events.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Helm
Helm
Kopf
Kopf

Helm is the best way to find, share, and use software built for Kubernetes.

It is a framework and a library to make Kubernetes operators development easier, just in a few lines of Python code. The main goal is to bring the Domain-Driven Design to the infrastructure level, with Kubernetes being an orchestrator/database of the domain objects (custom resources), and the operators containing the domain logic (with no or minimal infrastructure logic).

-
Simple, but powerful; Intuitive mapping of Python concepts to Kubernetes concepts and back; Support anything that exists in K8s; All the ways of handling that a developer can wish for; Eventual consistency of handling; Extra toolkits and integrations
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
2.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
180
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
2
Followers
911
Followers
3
Votes
18
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Infrastructure as code
  • 6
    Open source
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Testa­bil­i­ty and re­pro­ducibil­i­ty
  • 1
    Support
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to Helm, Kopf?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot