Hexo, Hugo, and Jekyll are static site generators, allowing developers to build static websites with ease. While they share common features, there are several key differences that set them apart. This Markdown code provides a concise overview of the main distinctions between Hexo, Hugo, and Jekyll for website developers.
Template Language:
Hexo and Jekyll both utilize Liquid as their templating language, allowing users to generate dynamic content. On the other hand, Hugo employs its own template language called Go, which may require users to learn a new syntax. Therefore, developers with existing Liquid knowledge might prefer Hexo or Jekyll for easier adaptation.
Performance:
Hugo boasts itself as one of the fastest static site generators, providing quick build times even for large websites. Hexo and Jekyll, while also being efficient, might not match the exceptional speed of Hugo's rendering process. For developers prioritizing performance, Hugo could be the optimal choice.
Ease of Use:
Jekyll, being the oldest and most widely used static site generator, offers extensive documentation and a large community for support. Hexo, while not as established as Jekyll, provides user-friendly interfaces for quick setup and customization. Hugo, although powerful, has a steeper learning curve due to its unique architecture, making it less beginner-friendly compared to Hexo and Jekyll.
Multilingual Support:
Jekyll has built-in multilingual support, allowing developers to efficiently create websites in multiple languages. While Hexo and Hugo also provide multilingual capabilities, they may require additional plugins or configuration. For projects requiring robust multilingual features out-of-the-box, Jekyll is a reliable choice.
Extensibility and Plugins:
Hexo, Jekyll, and Hugo all offer plugins and extensions that extend their functionality and allow developers to customize their websites. Jekyll boasts an extensive library of plugins due to its longstanding community support. Hexo offers a wide range of plugins but may require additional installation steps. Hugo, being built around a single binary, has a more streamlined approach to plugins, which simplifies their usage.
Documentation:
Jekyll has comprehensive documentation, reinforced by its large community, making it easy for developers to find answers to their questions. Hexo and Hugo also provide adequate documentation, but the depth and breadth of Jekyll's resources give it an advantage in terms of support and troubleshooting.
In Summary, Hexo, Hugo, and Jekyll are static site generators offering different advantages:
Hexo emphasizes ease of use and user-friendly interfaces.
Hugo prioritizes exceptional performance and rendering speed.
Jekyll boasts extensive documentation and a large community for support.
For multilingual projects, Jekyll provides built-in support, while Hexo and Hugo may require additional configuration.
Each generator offers plugin and extension capabilities, with Jekyll having the most extensive library of plugins.
Hugo utilizes its own template language, which might necessitate learning a new syntax.
Me and a lot of colleagues have done documentation collaboratively with https://hackmd.io/ which also comes as an open source fork as https://hedgedoc.org/. The first has commenting function, the latter hasn't. Both make it easy to do doc sprints synchronously which means everybody is on the phone at the same time and write down documentation. As you do this with Markdown you can use your writing with https://squidfunk.github.io/mkdocs-material/ e.g. which is a static site generator running on Python and build beautiful documentation from Markdown files. If you want to build with https://gohugo.io/ I recommend https://www.docsy.dev/ theme.
We do scholarly writing and documentation with GitLab which we host on-premise. GitHub and GitLab come with sophisticated workflows for commenting and quality assurance if you learn to branch and merge which is for a lot of folks a steep learning curve. To onboard colleagues I recommend starting with HedgeDoc first and then migrate to more advanced workflows with Git(Lab|Hub).
Hi everyone, I'm trying to decide which front-end tool, that will likely use server-side rendering (SSR), in hopes it'll be faster. The end-user will upload a document and they see text output on their screen (like SaaS or microservice). I read that Gatsby can also do SSR. Also want to add a headless CMS that is easy to use.
As a Frontend Developer I wanted something simple to generate static websites with technology I am familiar with. GatsbyJS was in the stack I am familiar with, does not need any other languages / package managers and allows quick content deployment in pure HTML or Markdown (what you prefer for a project). It also does not require you to understand a theming engine if you need a custom design.
Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.
Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.
Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.
Simple - No more databases, comment moderation, or pesky updates to install—just your content.;Static - Markdown (or Textile), Liquid, HTML & CSS go in. Static sites come out ready for deployment.;Blog-aware - Permalinks, categories, pages, posts, and custom layouts are all first-class citizens here.
Blazing Fast - Node.js brings you incredible generating speed. Hundreds of files take only seconds to build.;Markdown Support - All features of GitHub Flavored Markdown are supported. You can even use most Octopress plugins in Hexo.;One-Command Deployment - You only need one command to deploy your site to GitHub Pages, Heroku or other sites.;Various Plugins - Hexo has a powerful plugin system. You can install more plugins for Jade, CoffeeScript plugins.
Run Anywhere - Hugo is quite possibly the easiest to install software you've ever used, simply download and run. Hugo doesn't depend on administrative privileges, databases, runtimes, interpreters or external libraries. Sites built with Hugo can be deployed on S3, Github Pages, Dropbox or any web host.;Fast & Powerful - Hugo is written for speed and performance. Great care has been taken to ensure that Hugo build time is as short as possible. We're talking milliseconds to build your entire site for most setups.; Flexible - Hugo is designed to work how you do. Organize your content however you want with any URL structure. Declare your own content types. Define your own meta data in YAML, TOML or JSON.
