Hyperapp vs jQuery

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Hyperapp

35
51
+ 1
0
jQuery

190K
66.7K
+ 1
6.6K
Add tool

Hyperapp vs jQuery: What are the differences?

Hyperapp: 1 KB JavaScript library for building front end applications. Out of the box, Hyperapp combines state management with a VDOM engine that supports keyed updates & lifecycle events — all with no dependencies; jQuery: The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library. jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

Hyperapp and jQuery can be primarily classified as "Javascript UI Libraries" tools.

Hyperapp and jQuery are both open source tools. It seems that jQuery with 51.9K GitHub stars and 18.3K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Hyperapp with 16.8K GitHub stars and 753 GitHub forks.

Decisions about Hyperapp and jQuery
Peter Schmalfeldt
Senior Software Engineer · | 9 upvotes · 63K views

I have made an extended effort to drop frameworks completely if they are not actually needed. While I still use JS Frameworks like Vue, Angular and React ( if I have too ), I see far too often devs / teams deciding to build a single page site entirely in a framework, rather than just using HTML, CSS and a little JS.

I personally feel it's important to know when a framework is a good solution, and maybe when it's overkill.

See more
Malek Boubakri
Web developer at Quicktext · | 0 upvote · 208.9K views

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

See more
kazi shahin
CTO at Blubird Interactive Ltd. · | 3 upvotes · 101.5K views

I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source. So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?

See more
Manatsawin Hanmongkolchai
Chose
jQueryjQuery
over
ReactReact
in

When I started TipMe, I thought about using React frontend. At the end, plain, simple jQuery won.

I had to build this iteration of the site fast and by using jQuery I could keep using Django as a full stack development tool. One important point is Django form (combined with Django Bootstrap3) means that I don't have to reinvent form rendering again, which will be the case with React.

Over time, more interactivity seeped into the site and React components start making its way into the codebase.

I now wish the site is built using React so that I could add more user friendly interfaces easier (no more fuddling with server states) but I would still say jQuery helped me get past those early days.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Hyperapp
Pros of jQuery
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 1.3K
      Cross-browser
    • 957
      Dom manipulation
    • 809
      Power
    • 660
      Open source
    • 610
      Plugins
    • 459
      Easy
    • 395
      Popular
    • 350
      Feature-rich
    • 281
      Html5
    • 227
      Light weight
    • 93
      Simple
    • 84
      Great community
    • 79
      CSS3 Compliant
    • 69
      Mobile friendly
    • 67
      Fast
    • 43
      Intuitive
    • 42
      Swiss Army knife for webdev
    • 35
      Huge Community
    • 11
      Easy to learn
    • 4
      Clean code
    • 3
      Because of Ajax request :)
    • 2
      Powerful
    • 2
      Nice
    • 2
      Just awesome
    • 2
      Used everywhere
    • 1
      Improves productivity
    • 1
      Javascript
    • 1
      Easy Setup
    • 1
      Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup
    • 1
      It Just Works
    • 1
      Industry acceptance
    • 1
      Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS
    • 1
      Widely Used
    • 1
      I love jQuery

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Hyperapp
    Cons of jQuery
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 6
        Large size
      • 5
        Sometimes inconsistent API
      • 5
        Encourages DOM as primary data source
      • 2
        Live events is overly complex feature

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Hyperapp?

      Out of the box, Hyperapp combines state management with a VDOM engine that supports keyed updates & lifecycle events — all with no dependencies.

      What is jQuery?

      jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Hyperapp?
      What companies use jQuery?
      See which teams inside your own company are using Hyperapp or jQuery.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Hyperapp?
      What tools integrate with jQuery?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      What are some alternatives to Hyperapp and jQuery?
      React
      Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
      Preact
      Preact is an attempt to recreate the core value proposition of React (or similar libraries like Mithril) using as little code as possible, with first-class support for ES2015. Currently the library is around 3kb (minified & gzipped).
      Mithril
      Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.
      Svelte
      If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.
      Elm
      Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.
      See all alternatives