StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Hyperapp vs Mosaic

Hyperapp vs Mosaic

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hyperapp
Hyperapp
Stacks38
Followers51
Votes0
Mosaic
Mosaic
Stacks1
Followers13
Votes0
GitHub Stars386
Forks10

Hyperapp vs Mosaic: What are the differences?

  1. Virtual DOM: Hyperapp uses a virtual DOM for efficiently updating the user interface, while Mosaic does not rely on a Virtual DOM.

  2. Component Architecture: Hyperapp follows a minimalistic approach with components being simple functions, whereas Mosaic uses a more intricate component architecture with more advanced features such as scaffolding and scaffolders.

  3. Global State Management: Hyperapp provides a built-in global state management solution, while Mosaic does not have a built-in state management system and relies on popular third-party libraries.

  4. Size and Performance: Hyperapp is known for its small size and fast performance, making it a lightweight option for building web applications, whereas Mosaic may be more feature-rich but could come at the cost of increased bundle size and potentially slower performance.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Hyperapp has a smaller community compared to Mosaic, which may impact the availability of resources, plugins, and support for developers working with the framework.

In Summary, Hyperapp and Mosaic differ in their use of virtual DOM, component architecture, global state management, size and performance, and community and ecosystem support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Hyperapp
Hyperapp
Mosaic
Mosaic

Out of the box, Hyperapp combines state management with a VDOM engine that supports keyed updates & lifecycle events — all with no dependencies.

A declarative front-end JavaScript library for building user interfaces. Component-Based making pieces of code reusable and keep track of their own data, actions, lifecycle functions, and more.

2x faster than react; Minimal;Functional;Batteries-included; 10ms time to interactive
Component-Based; Observable Data; Smart DOM; Built-in Router; State Manager; Small Library Size; Tagged Template Li
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
386
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
10
Stacks
38
Stacks
1
Followers
51
Followers
13
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Hyperapp, Mosaic?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase