StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. IBM MQ vs Mosquitto

IBM MQ vs Mosquitto

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mosquitto
Mosquitto
Stacks136
Followers306
Votes14
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
Stacks118
Followers187
Votes11

IBM MQ vs Mosquitto: What are the differences?

Key Differences between IBM MQ and Mosquitto

  1. Protocol Support: IBM MQ primarily focuses on supporting the MQ Telemetry Transport (MQTT) protocol, while Mosquitto is an open-source MQTT broker that provides lightweight messaging functionality. IBM MQ offers support for various other protocols such as HTTP, WebSphere MQ, and more, making it versatile for different messaging environments.

  2. Commercial vs Open-Source: IBM MQ is a commercial product developed by IBM, offering enterprise-grade features, support, and scalability. In contrast, Mosquitto is an open-source project maintained by the Eclipse Foundation, providing a cost-effective solution for smaller-scale deployments that may not require extensive support.

  3. Scalability: IBM MQ is known for its high scalability, robustness, and reliability, making it suitable for large enterprises with high messaging volumes and stringent reliability requirements. Mosquitto, on the other hand, is more lightweight and suitable for smaller deployments or IoT applications where scalability may not be a primary concern.

  4. Integration Capabilities: IBM MQ offers seamless integration with other IBM products and enterprise applications, providing comprehensive messaging middleware capabilities. Mosquitto, being a standalone MQTT broker, may require additional integration efforts to connect with other systems and applications outside of the MQTT ecosystem.

  5. Feature Set: IBM MQ comes with a wide range of advanced features such as message queuing, publish/subscribe messaging, message persistence, and transaction support, making it a comprehensive messaging solution for complex business requirements. Mosquitto, while offering essential MQTT broker functionalities, may lack some of the advanced features and capabilities provided by IBM MQ.

  6. Commercial Support and SLAs: IBM MQ comes with the option of commercial support, service level agreements (SLAs), and extensive documentation provided by IBM, ensuring timely assistance and resolution of any issues that may arise. Mosquitto, being an open-source project, relies on community support, forums, and user contributions for assistance, which may not always guarantee the same level of support as a commercial product.

In Summary, IBM MQ is a robust, commercial messaging middleware with extensive protocol support, scalability, and feature set, while Mosquitto is an open-source MQTT broker suitable for smaller-scale deployments with basic messaging requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mosquitto
Mosquitto
IBM MQ
IBM MQ

It is lightweight and is suitable for use on all devices from low power single board computers to full servers.. The MQTT protocol provides a lightweight method of carrying out messaging using a publish/subscribe model. This makes it suitable for Internet of Things messaging such as with low power sensors or mobile devices such as phones, embedded computers or microcontrollers.

It is a messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and business data across multiple platforms. It offers proven, enterprise-grade messaging capabilities that skillfully and safely move information.

-
Once-and-once-only delivery; Asynchronous messaging; Powerful protection; Simplified, smart management; Augmented security; Expanded client application options
Statistics
Stacks
136
Stacks
118
Followers
306
Followers
187
Votes
14
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Simple and light
  • 4
    Performance
Pros
  • 3
    Reliable for banking transactions
  • 3
    Useful for big enteprises
  • 2
    Secure
  • 1
    Broader connectivity - more protocols, APIs, Files etc
  • 1
    High Availability
Cons
  • 2
    Cost

What are some alternatives to Mosquitto, IBM MQ?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Memphis

Memphis

Highly scalable and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming apps fast.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase