Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
IBM MQ vs Apache RocketMQ: What are the differences?
IBM MQ: Enterprise-grade messaging middleware. It is a messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and business data across multiple platforms. It offers proven, enterprise-grade messaging capabilities that skillfully and safely move information; Apache RocketMQ: Open source distributed messaging and streaming data platform. Apache RocketMQ is a distributed messaging and streaming platform with low latency, high performance and reliability, trillion-level capacity and flexible scalability.
IBM MQ and Apache RocketMQ can be categorized as "Message Queue" tools.
Apache RocketMQ is an open source tool with 8.26K GitHub stars and 4.24K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Apache RocketMQ's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of IBM MQ
- Reliable for banking transactions3
- Useful for big enteprises3
- Secure2
- Broader connectivity - more protocols, APIs, Files etc1
- Many deployment options (containers, cloud, VM etc)1
- High Availability1
Pros of Apache RocketMQ
- Million-level message accumulation capacity in a single2
- Support tracing message and transactional message2
- BigData Friendly1
- High throughput messaging1
- Feature-rich administrative dashboard for configuration1
- Low latency1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of IBM MQ
- Cost2