Icinga vs LibreNMS

Overview

Icinga

Stacks120

Followers97

Votes0

LibreNMS

Stacks55

Followers186

Votes0

GitHub Stars4.4K

Forks2.5K

Icinga vs LibreNMS: What are the differences?

Introduction

Icinga and LibreNMS are both open-source monitoring tools used to ensure the performance and availability of network infrastructure. However, there are key differences between them that set them apart in terms of features and functionalities.

Integration with Other Tools and Platforms: Icinga offers multiple integrations with third-party tools, such as Grafana for visualization and InfluxDB for time series data storage. In contrast, LibreNMS has comprehensive built-in features that eliminate the need for additional integrations, providing a more all-in-one solution.
Network Device Support: Icinga focuses primarily on monitoring servers and infrastructure services. While it can monitor network devices, it lacks some advanced network-specific features. LibreNMS, on the other hand, is specifically designed for network device monitoring, providing in-depth insights and support for devices like routers, switches, and wireless access points.
Alerting and Notification System: Icinga offers a flexible and customizable alerting system, allowing you to define thresholds, escalations, and notification methods. It supports various notification channels such as email, SMS, and Slack. LibreNMS, on the other hand, has a more straightforward alerting system but offers more pre-defined alert rules and options out-of-the-box.
Scalability and Performance: Icinga is known for its scalability and ability to handle large infrastructures effectively. Its distributed architecture allows for efficient resource utilization and high availability. LibreNMS, while scalable, is more suitable for smaller to mid-sized networks, as its performance could be impacted when dealing with a considerably large number of devices.
User Interface and Ease of Use: Icinga has a complex and powerful web interface that offers a wide range of features but requires more technical expertise to set up and navigate. LibreNMS, on the other hand, has a user-friendly interface that is intuitive and easy to navigate. It provides a simpler and more streamlined user experience, making it more accessible to non-technical users.
Community and Support: Both Icinga and LibreNMS have active and supportive communities, providing assistance and regular updates. However, Icinga has a larger and more established community, offering a wealth of community-contributed plugins, extensions, and resources. LibreNMS, while growing, has a smaller community but benefits from its active development and frequent updates.

In Summary, Icinga offers more flexibility for integrations, focuses on server monitoring, and provides a scalable solution suitable for larger infrastructures. On the other hand, LibreNMS specializes in network device monitoring, offers a simpler user interface, and is more suited for smaller to mid-sized networks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Icinga, LibreNMS

Matthias

Teamlead IT at NanoTemper Technologies

Jun 11, 2020

Decided

free open source
modern interface and architecture
large community
extendable I knew Nagios for decades but it was really outdated (by its architecture) at some point. That's why Icinga started first as a fork, not with Icinga2 it is completely built from scratch but backward-compatible with Nagios plugins. Now it has reached a state with which I am confident.

142k views142k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Icinga	LibreNMS
It monitors availability and performance, gives you simple access to relevant data and raises alerts to keep you in the loop. It was originally created as a fork of the Nagios system monitoring application.	It is an auto-discovering PHP/MySQL/SNMP based network monitoring which includes support for a wide range of network hardware and operating systems including Cisco, Linux, FreeBSD, Juniper, Brocade, Foundry, HP and many more.
-	Monitoring; Alerting; Distributed monitoring; Open-source; Automatic discovery; API; Billing system; Automatic updates
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 4.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.5K
Stacks 120	Stacks 55
Followers 97	Followers 186
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	Datadog Kong EasyEngine Plesk Server Density OpenResty OpsDash Scalyr

What are some alternatives to Icinga, LibreNMS?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Related Comparisons

Icinga vs LibreNMS: What are the differences?

Introduction

Integration with Other Tools and Platforms: Icinga offers multiple integrations with third-party tools, such as Grafana for visualization and InfluxDB for time series data storage. In contrast, LibreNMS has comprehensive built-in features that eliminate the need for additional integrations, providing a more all-in-one solution.
Network Device Support: Icinga focuses primarily on monitoring servers and infrastructure services. While it can monitor network devices, it lacks some advanced network-specific features. LibreNMS, on the other hand, is specifically designed for network device monitoring, providing in-depth insights and support for devices like routers, switches, and wireless access points.
Alerting and Notification System: Icinga offers a flexible and customizable alerting system, allowing you to define thresholds, escalations, and notification methods. It supports various notification channels such as email, SMS, and Slack. LibreNMS, on the other hand, has a more straightforward alerting system but offers more pre-defined alert rules and options out-of-the-box.
Scalability and Performance: Icinga is known for its scalability and ability to handle large infrastructures effectively. Its distributed architecture allows for efficient resource utilization and high availability. LibreNMS, while scalable, is more suitable for smaller to mid-sized networks, as its performance could be impacted when dealing with a considerably large number of devices.
User Interface and Ease of Use: Icinga has a complex and powerful web interface that offers a wide range of features but requires more technical expertise to set up and navigate. LibreNMS, on the other hand, has a user-friendly interface that is intuitive and easy to navigate. It provides a simpler and more streamlined user experience, making it more accessible to non-technical users.
Community and Support: Both Icinga and LibreNMS have active and supportive communities, providing assistance and regular updates. However, Icinga has a larger and more established community, offering a wealth of community-contributed plugins, extensions, and resources. LibreNMS, while growing, has a smaller community but benefits from its active development and frequent updates.

Icinga vs LibreNMS

Overview