StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Infer vs Stylelint

Infer vs Stylelint

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Infer
Infer
Stacks18
Followers69
Votes0
GitHub Stars15.4K
Forks2.1K
Stylelint
Stylelint
Stacks1.6K
Followers100
Votes6
GitHub Stars11.4K
Forks986

Infer vs Stylelint: What are the differences?

  1. Syntax Checking: Infer is a static code analyzer that is mainly focused on detecting runtime errors in software written in C, C++, and Objective-C, providing static analysis that can catch bugs early in the development process. On the other hand, Stylelint is a linter tool that focuses on enforcing consistent coding styles and conventions in CSS and SCSS files, ensuring that the codebase follows a specific set of rules and guidelines.
  2. Error Detection: Infer specializes in detecting bugs related to null pointer dereferences, memory leaks, race conditions, and other types of common programming errors that can lead to crashes or unexpected behavior at runtime, whereas Stylelint is primarily used for identifying issues related to code formatting, naming conventions, and maintainability in CSS files, ensuring that the code is readable, maintainable, and adheres to best practices.
  3. Language Support: Infer is designed to work with C, C++, and Objective-C codebases, allowing developers to analyze and improve the quality of their code written in these languages, while Stylelint is specifically tailored for CSS and SCSS, providing linting capabilities for stylesheets to ensure consistency and uniformity in styling across the project.
  4. Integration and Customization: Infer can be integrated into the build process of a project to automatically analyze the code and provide feedback, with options for customization and tuning to focus on specific types of bugs or performance issues, whereas Stylelint can be integrated into code editors or build tools to enforce coding styles and conventions, with configurations that can be customized to match the coding standards of the project.
  5. Focus on Bug Prevention vs. Code Style: Infer's main goal is to prevent runtime errors and improve the reliability and robustness of the codebase by detecting bugs early in the development cycle, focusing on correctness and security, while Stylelint's primary objective is to maintain code quality and consistency by enforcing coding styles and conventions, emphasizing readability and maintainability of the codebase.

In Summary, Infer focuses on detecting runtime errors and bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C codebases, while Stylelint is used for enforcing coding styles and conventions in CSS and SCSS files to ensure consistency and readability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Infer, Stylelint

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Budi
Budi

Programmer

Aug 19, 2020

Review

I think you scan skip MongoDB for now and focussing on creating web component with Reactjs or Vue, I would also recommend to use TypeScript for type hinting support.

For styling, learn CSS first then upgrade to SASS/SCSS or LESS (pick one as mostly same concept) to make CSS more maintainable.

Also to improve your skill on both sectors, install linters if available. For TypeScipt, there are TSLint and for styling, i think there are Stylint. Linter will help you adapt to make a clean code and understand how other peoples usually styled their code.

41.6k views41.6k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Infer
Infer
Stylelint
Stylelint

Facebook Infer is a static analysis tool - if you give Infer some Objective-C, Java, or C code, it produces a list of potential bugs. Anyone can use Infer to intercept critical bugs before they have shipped to people's phones, and help prevent crashes or poor performance.

A mighty, modern CSS linter that helps you enforce consistent conventions and avoid errors in your stylesheets.

Android and Java - Infer reports null pointer exceptions and resource leaks in Android and Java code.;iOS - In addition to this, it reports memory leak problems in iOS and C code.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.4K
GitHub Stars
11.4K
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
986
Stacks
18
Stacks
1.6K
Followers
69
Followers
100
Votes
0
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 5
    Great way to lint your CSS or SCSS
  • 1
    Only complains about real problems
Integrations
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
Android SDK
Android SDK
Java
Java
Objective-C
Objective-C
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Infer, Stylelint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana