Apache Zeppelin vs IPython

Overview

Apache Zeppelin

Stacks190

Followers306

Votes32

GitHub Stars6.6K

Forks2.8K

IPython

Stacks832

Followers111

Votes4

Apache Zeppelin vs IPython: What are the differences?

Apache Zeppelin and IPython are both popular tools for interactive computing, but they have key differences that distinguish them in functionality and usage.

Programming Languages: Apache Zeppelin supports multiple programming languages including Scala, Python, SQL, and others, making it versatile for different tasks. On the other hand, IPython primarily focuses on Python and does not have built-in support for various programming languages.
Visualization Capabilities: Apache Zeppelin offers a wide range of data visualization options, allowing users to create interactive plots, graphs, and charts within the notebook itself. In contrast, IPython's visualization capabilities are more limited and may require additional libraries for advanced visualizations.
Data Collaboration: Apache Zeppelin facilitates collaborative work on data projects by allowing multiple users to share and work on the same notebook simultaneously. IPython, however, is more suited for individual use and does not have the same level of built-in collaboration features.
Integration with Big Data Tools: Apache Zeppelin has strong integration with various big data tools and frameworks such as Apache Spark, Hadoop, and Flink, enabling seamless data analysis on large datasets. In comparison, while IPython can work with some big data tools, its integration and compatibility may not be as extensive as Zeppelin.
Extensibility and Plugins: Apache Zeppelin supports a wide range of plugins and extensions that extend its functionalities and capabilities, allowing users to customize their environment as needed. In contrast, IPython's extensibility through plugins is not as robust, limiting the extent to which users can customize their interactive computing experience.
User Interface: Apache Zeppelin offers a comprehensive and user-friendly interface with features like table display, form inputs, and dynamic updating of output cells, enhancing the user experience. IPython, while also user-friendly, may not provide as many interactive and dynamic features in its interface as Zeppelin.

In Summary, Apache Zeppelin and IPython differ in their support for programming languages, visualization capabilities, collaboration features, integration with big data tools, extensibility through plugins, and user interface design.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Zeppelin	IPython
A web-based notebook that enables interactive data analytics. You can make beautiful data-driven, interactive and collaborative documents with SQL, Scala and more.	It provides a rich architecture for interactive computing with a powerful interactive shell, a kernel for Jupyter. It has a support for interactive data visualization and use of GUI toolkits. Flexible, embeddable interpreters to load into your own projects. Easy to use, high performance tools for parallel computing.
-	Interactive; Magic; embeddable interpreters; parallel computing
Statistics
GitHub Stars 6.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.8K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 190	Stacks 832
Followers 306	Followers 111
Votes 32	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
Pros 7 In-line code execution using paragraphs 5 Cluster integration 4 Zeppelin context to exchange data between languages 4 In-line graphing 4 Multi-User Capability	Pros 1 Help in a keystroke 1 Interactive exploration then save to a script 1 It's magical are just that 1 Persistent history between sessions
Integrations
Cassandra Apache Spark R Language PostgreSQL Elasticsearch HBase Hadoop Apache Flink Python	Python PyCharm Apache Spark

What are some alternatives to Apache Zeppelin, IPython?

Jupyter

The Jupyter Notebook is a web-based interactive computing platform. The notebook combines live code, equations, narrative text, visualizations, interactive dashboards and other media.

Deepnote

Deepnote is building the best data science notebook for teams. In the notebook, users can connect their data, explore and analyze it with real-time collaboration and versioning, and easily share and present the polished assets to end users.

GNU Bash

The Bourne Again SHell is an sh-compatible shell that incorporates useful features from the Korn shell (ksh) and C shell (csh). It is intended to conform to the IEEE POSIX P1003.2/ISO 9945.2 Shell and Tools standard.

Shell

A shell is a text-based terminal, used for manipulating programs and files. Shell scripts typically manage program execution.

PowerShell

A command-line shell and scripting language built on .NET. Helps system administrators and power-users rapidly automate tasks that manage operating systems (Linux, macOS, and Windows) and processes.

Zsh (Z shell)

An interactive login shell, command interpreter and scripting language.

Fish Shell

It is a useful utility filled shell which makes command line operations quicker with customized functions, easy to append path variable command, command history and more right out of the box.

Google Colaboratory

It is a hosted Jupyter Notebook service that requires no setup to use and provides free access to computing resources, including GPUs and TPUs. Colab is especially well suited to machine learning, data science, and education.

SageMath

It is a free open-source mathematics software system licensed under the GPL. It builds on top of many existing open-source packages: NumPy, SciPy, matplotlib, Sympy, Maxima, GAP, FLINT, R and many more.

Tabby

It is an infinitely customizable cross-platform terminal app for local shells, serial, SSH and Telnet connections.

Related Comparisons

Apache Zeppelin vs IPython: What are the differences?

Apache Zeppelin and IPython are both popular tools for interactive computing, but they have key differences that distinguish them in functionality and usage.

Programming Languages: Apache Zeppelin supports multiple programming languages including Scala, Python, SQL, and others, making it versatile for different tasks. On the other hand, IPython primarily focuses on Python and does not have built-in support for various programming languages.
Visualization Capabilities: Apache Zeppelin offers a wide range of data visualization options, allowing users to create interactive plots, graphs, and charts within the notebook itself. In contrast, IPython's visualization capabilities are more limited and may require additional libraries for advanced visualizations.
Data Collaboration: Apache Zeppelin facilitates collaborative work on data projects by allowing multiple users to share and work on the same notebook simultaneously. IPython, however, is more suited for individual use and does not have the same level of built-in collaboration features.
Integration with Big Data Tools: Apache Zeppelin has strong integration with various big data tools and frameworks such as Apache Spark, Hadoop, and Flink, enabling seamless data analysis on large datasets. In comparison, while IPython can work with some big data tools, its integration and compatibility may not be as extensive as Zeppelin.
Extensibility and Plugins: Apache Zeppelin supports a wide range of plugins and extensions that extend its functionalities and capabilities, allowing users to customize their environment as needed. In contrast, IPython's extensibility through plugins is not as robust, limiting the extent to which users can customize their interactive computing experience.
User Interface: Apache Zeppelin offers a comprehensive and user-friendly interface with features like table display, form inputs, and dynamic updating of output cells, enhancing the user experience. IPython, while also user-friendly, may not provide as many interactive and dynamic features in its interface as Zeppelin.

Apache Zeppelin vs IPython

Overview