StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Java Tools
  5. JSF vs Java 8

JSF vs Java 8

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Java 8
Java 8
Stacks685
Followers629
Votes0
JSF
JSF
Stacks138
Followers222
Votes4

JSF vs Java 8: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between JSF (JavaServer Faces) and Java 8. JSF is a Java web application framework for building user interfaces, while Java 8 is a programming language release that introduced several new features and improvements. Now, let's dive into the differences between these two.

  1. Expression Language: JSF provides a unified and simplified expression language to access and manipulate data in the user interface components. It allows developers to bind values directly to UI components without writing extensive code. On the other hand, Java 8 introduced a new version of the expression language called the Stream API. This API provides a functional programming paradigm and allows developers to perform complex operations on collections with concise and expressive code.

  2. Lambda Expressions: Java 8 introduced lambda expressions, which are essentially anonymous functions that can be passed around as variables. This new feature simplifies coding in Java and enables developers to write more concise and expressive code. In contrast, JSF does not have native support for lambda expressions.

  3. Date and Time API: Java 8 introduced a new Date and Time API that provides a more comprehensive and flexible approach to handle date and time-related operations. This API offers improved functionality compared to the older Date and Calendar classes. JSF, however, does not have built-in support for the Java 8 Date and Time API.

  4. Default Methods: With Java 8, interfaces can now have default methods, which allow developers to add new functionality to an interface without breaking existing implementations. This feature enhances the backwards compatibility of interfaces. In JSF, there is no direct equivalent to default methods in Java 8.

  5. Parallel Processing: Java 8 introduced the concept of parallel processing, which enables developers to leverage multi-core processors for improved performance and efficiency. This feature is particularly useful for computationally intensive tasks. JSF, being a web application framework, does not inherently provide parallel processing capabilities.

  6. Functional Interfaces: Java 8 introduced functional interfaces, which are interfaces with a single abstract method. These interfaces can be used as lambda expressions or method references. Functional interfaces play a crucial role in enabling functional programming paradigms in Java 8. JSF does not have native support for functional interfaces.

In summary, some key differences between JSF and Java 8 include the presence of a unified expression language in JSF, the introduction of lambda expressions, a new Date and Time API, support for default methods in Java 8 interfaces, parallel processing capabilities, and the concept of functional interfaces in Java 8.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Java 8
Java 8
JSF
JSF

It is a revolutionary release of the world’s no 1 development platform. It includes a huge upgrade to the Java programming model and a coordinated evolution of the JVM, Java language, and libraries. Java 8 includes features for productivity, ease of use, improved polyglot programming, security and improved performance.

It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community

Statistics
Stacks
685
Stacks
138
Followers
629
Followers
222
Votes
0
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Rich and comprehensive Request Life-cycle
  • 1
    Server Side component
  • 1
    Very Mature UI framework
Integrations
No integrations available
Java
Java
Java EE
Java EE

What are some alternatives to Java 8, JSF?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Mithril

Mithril

Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.

Quarkus

Quarkus

It tailors your application for GraalVM and HotSpot. Amazingly fast boot time, incredibly low RSS memory (not just heap size!) offering near instant scale up and high density memory utilization in container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. We use a technique we call compile time boot.

Marionette

Marionette

It is a JavaScript library with a RESTful JSON interface and is based on the Model–view–presenter application design paradigm. Backbone is known for being lightweight, as its only hard dependency is on one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, plus jQuery for use of the full library.

Ampersand.js

Ampersand.js

We <3 Backbone.js at &yet. It’s brilliantly simple and solves many common problems in developing clientside applications. But we missed the focused simplicity of tiny modules in node-land. We wanted something similar in style and philosophy, but that fully embraced tiny modules, npm, and browserify. Ampersand.js is a well-defined approach to combining (get it?) a series of intentionally tiny modules.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase