StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. Java EE vs WebAssembly

Java EE vs WebAssembly

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Java EE
Java EE
Stacks705
Followers460
Votes2
WebAssembly
WebAssembly
Stacks223
Followers218
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.2K
Forks818

Java EE vs WebAssembly: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Java EE and WebAssembly outlining their key differences.

1. **Execution Environment**: Java EE is a platform for building enterprise applications using the Java programming language, while WebAssembly is a binary instruction format that runs in web browsers alongside JavaScript.
   
2. **Programming Language Support**: Java EE primarily supports Java for application development, while WebAssembly is language-agnostic, allowing developers to use languages like C++, Rust, and others, compiling them to WebAssembly.
   
3. **Runtime Performance**: Java EE applications are typically run on a Java Virtual Machine (JVM) which may introduce some performance overhead, whereas WebAssembly provides near-native performance due to its focus on efficiency.
   
4. **Application Scope**: Java EE is suitable for building large-scale enterprise applications with server-side logic, whereas WebAssembly is mainly used for running client-side applications within a web browser.
   
5. **Deployment Process**: Java EE applications are traditionally deployed on servers, requiring a server infrastructure, while WebAssembly applications can be easily distributed and executed on client machines without the need for server support.
   
6. **Interoperability**: Java EE applications can interact with other Java-based systems and technologies easily due to the Java ecosystem, whereas WebAssembly provides interoperability with other web technologies through standardized APIs like WebAssembly System Interface (WASI) and Web APIs.

# Summary
In Summary, Java EE and WebAssembly differ in their execution environments, programming language support, runtime performance, application scope, deployment process, and interoperability capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Java EE
Java EE
WebAssembly
WebAssembly

It is developed using the Java Community Process, with contributions from industry experts, commercial and open source organizations, Java User Groups, and countless individuals. It offers a rich enterprise software platform and with over 20 compliant implementations to choose from.

It is an open standard that defines a portable binary code format for executable programs, and a corresponding textual assembly language, as well as interfaces for facilitating interactions between such programs and their host environment.

-
Efficient and fast; Safe; Open and debuggable; Part of the open web platform
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
818
Stacks
705
Stacks
223
Followers
460
Followers
218
Votes
2
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    High level of security
  • 1
    Inherits all java advantages
Cons
  • 2
    PAID
Cons
  • 2
    Security issues
Integrations
Eclipse
Eclipse
Spring
Spring
NetBeans IDE
NetBeans IDE
Rust
Rust
C++
C++
C lang
C lang

What are some alternatives to Java EE, WebAssembly?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase