JAWS vs Node.js

Overview

Node.js

Stacks200.4K

Followers164.5K

Votes8.5K

GitHub Stars114.1K

Forks33.7K

JAWS

Stacks6

Followers50

Votes2

JAWS vs Node.js: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between JAWS and Node.js.

# 1. Architecture:
JAWS is a serverless framework that focuses on building scalable and cost-effective applications by abstracting away server management tasks, while Node.js is a JavaScript runtime environment that allows developers to write server-side applications. JAWS leverages AWS Lambda for its serverless architecture, enabling auto-scaling and pay-per-use pricing, whereas Node.js runs on the V8 JavaScript engine and provides a non-blocking, event-driven architecture.

# 2. Supported languages:
JAWS primarily supports JavaScript for building serverless applications, allowing developers to write functions and APIs using Node.js syntax. On the other hand, Node.js supports a wide range of programming languages beyond JavaScript, including TypeScript, Python, Ruby, and Java, offering greater flexibility in technology stack choices.

# 3. Deployment and scaling:
JAWS streamlines the deployment process by automatically provisioning the necessary resources on AWS Lambda and handling scaling based on demand. In contrast, Node.js applications need to be deployed on servers or containers, requiring manual scaling and resource management by the developers.

# 4. Ecosystem and community:
Node.js has a vast ecosystem of libraries and frameworks available through npm, enabling developers to easily integrate third-party packages into their applications. While JAWS offers a serverless-specific ecosystem with plugins and integrations tailored for AWS Lambda, Node.js has a broader community support across different use cases and platforms.

# 5. Learning curve:
JAWS abstracts many of the complexities of serverless architecture, making it easier for developers to get started with building serverless applications. However, Node.js has a steeper learning curve due to its lower-level nature and the need for understanding event-driven programming concepts. 

# 6. Cost considerations:
JAWS' pay-per-use pricing model based on AWS Lambda usage can lead to cost savings for applications with variable traffic patterns. On the other hand, Node.js applications hosted on traditional servers or containers may require upfront infrastructure costs and ongoing maintenance expenses, potentially impacting the overall cost of operation.

In Summary, the key differences between JAWS and Node.js lie in their architecture, supported languages, deployment and scaling options, ecosystem and community support, learning curve, and cost considerations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Node.js, JAWS

abderrahmane

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

I am a front-end guy and in the last month I've been trynig to be learn backend in python. I think python is a great language to but when i start to learn django I didn't like it because everythong is already done for you, you dont need to do much make it works and I like coding thing that take me time. I've been thinking about switching to another programing language or just learn Node js and stick with it. I need to know if django is that easy.

136k views136k

Comments

Mohammad

Oct 28, 2019

Needs adviceon

Node.js

Laravel

PHP

I want to create a video sharing service like Youtube, which users can use to upload and watch videos. I prefer to use Vue.js for front-end. What do you suggest for the back-end? @{Node.js}|tool:1011| or @{Laravel}|tool:992| ( @{PHP}|tool:991| ) I need a good performance with high speed, and the most important thing is the ability to handle user's requests if the site's traffic increases. I want to create an algorithm that users who watch others videos earn points (randomly but in clear context) If you have anything else to improve, please let me know. For eg: If you prefer React to Vue.js. Thanks in advance

309k views309k

Comments

Zubair

Director at Aafiyah Technologies

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

Hi Team

I want your suggestions in order for me to decide which stack is suitable for the below-mentioned requirement.

Currently, I am considering building it in Wordpress (Starting with prebuilt plugins and develop on it)

But I am skeptical, so I am considering Laravel.

And recently I found one very good solution built in Angular, Node and MySQL

Here are the high-level goals I am trying to achieve:

The system has 3 modules

Multi-Vendor e-commerce Market Place
Peer to peer Selling of used items
Listing/ Directory kind of portal for the service industry

290k views290k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Node.js	JAWS
Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.	The Javascript + AWS Stack – A server-free, webapp boilerplate using bleeding-edge AWS services that redefine how to build massively scalable web applications
-	Use No Servers: Never deal with scaling/deploying/maintaing/monitoring servers again.;Isolated Components: The JAWS back-end is comprised entirely of AWS Lambda Functions. ;Scale Infinitely: A back-end comprised of Lambda functions comes with a ton of concurrency and you can easily enable multi-region redundancy.;Be Cheap As Possible: Lambda functions run only when they are called, and you only pay for when they are run.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 114.1K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 33.7K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 200.4K	Stacks 6
Followers 164.5K	Followers 50
Votes 8.5K	Votes 2
Pros & Cons
Pros 1439 Npm 1279 Javascript 1129 Great libraries 1012 High-performance 805 Open source Cons 46 Bound to a single CPU 45 New framework every day 40 Lots of terrible examples on the internet 33 Asynchronous programming is the worst 24 Callback	Pros 2 Heroku
Integrations
No integrations available	AWS Lambda Amazon DynamoDB Amazon API Gateway Amazon S3 JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Node.js, JAWS?

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

JAWS vs Node.js: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between JAWS and Node.js.

# 1. Architecture:
JAWS is a serverless framework that focuses on building scalable and cost-effective applications by abstracting away server management tasks, while Node.js is a JavaScript runtime environment that allows developers to write server-side applications. JAWS leverages AWS Lambda for its serverless architecture, enabling auto-scaling and pay-per-use pricing, whereas Node.js runs on the V8 JavaScript engine and provides a non-blocking, event-driven architecture.

# 2. Supported languages:
JAWS primarily supports JavaScript for building serverless applications, allowing developers to write functions and APIs using Node.js syntax. On the other hand, Node.js supports a wide range of programming languages beyond JavaScript, including TypeScript, Python, Ruby, and Java, offering greater flexibility in technology stack choices.

# 3. Deployment and scaling:
JAWS streamlines the deployment process by automatically provisioning the necessary resources on AWS Lambda and handling scaling based on demand. In contrast, Node.js applications need to be deployed on servers or containers, requiring manual scaling and resource management by the developers.

# 4. Ecosystem and community:
Node.js has a vast ecosystem of libraries and frameworks available through npm, enabling developers to easily integrate third-party packages into their applications. While JAWS offers a serverless-specific ecosystem with plugins and integrations tailored for AWS Lambda, Node.js has a broader community support across different use cases and platforms.

# 5. Learning curve:
JAWS abstracts many of the complexities of serverless architecture, making it easier for developers to get started with building serverless applications. However, Node.js has a steeper learning curve due to its lower-level nature and the need for understanding event-driven programming concepts. 

# 6. Cost considerations:
JAWS' pay-per-use pricing model based on AWS Lambda usage can lead to cost savings for applications with variable traffic patterns. On the other hand, Node.js applications hosted on traditional servers or containers may require upfront infrastructure costs and ongoing maintenance expenses, potentially impacting the overall cost of operation.

JAWS vs Node.js

Overview