JBehave vs pytest

Overview

pytest

Stacks4.0K

Followers307

Votes0

GitHub Stars13.2K

Forks2.9K

JBehave

Stacks9

Followers18

Votes0

GitHub Stars34

Forks18

JBehave vs pytest: What are the differences?

Introduction:

JBehave and pytest are both popular testing frameworks used in software development to conduct automated testing of applications. However, there are key differences between the two that developers must consider when choosing a testing framework for their projects.

Language Support: JBehave is primarily designed for Java-based applications, while pytest is used for testing Python applications. This difference in language support makes it essential for developers to choose a testing framework that aligns with the programming language of their application.
Syntax: JBehave uses a behavior-driven development (BDD) approach, which involves writing test scenarios in a natural language format. On the other hand, pytest follows a more traditional test-driven development (TDD) approach, where test cases are written using Python code. The syntax differences can impact how test cases are written and maintained in each framework.
Reporting: JBehave provides comprehensive reporting features that allow developers to generate detailed test reports, including test results and statistics. In contrast, pytest offers more minimalist reporting capabilities, which may be sufficient for some projects but lacking in detail for others. Developers should consider their reporting needs when selecting a testing framework.
Fixture Management: pytest offers robust fixture management capabilities, making it easier for developers to set up and tear down test environments. JBehave, while still capable of managing fixtures, may require more manual intervention in setting up test environments. The difference in fixture management can impact the ease and efficiency of writing and executing test cases.
Community and Ecosystem: Both JBehave and pytest have active communities and support extensive ecosystems of plugins and extensions. However, the size and specific offerings of these communities may vary. Developers should consider the availability of community support and relevant plugins when choosing a testing framework for their projects.
Integration with Other Tools: JBehave and pytest both support integration with various tools and frameworks, such as build servers and continuous integration systems. However, the ease of integration and compatibility with specific tools may differ between the two frameworks. Developers should evaluate how well each framework integrates with their existing development workflow.

In Summary, JBehave and pytest differ in language support, syntax, reporting capabilities, fixture management, community support, and integration with other tools. Developers should carefully consider these factors when selecting a testing framework for their projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

pytest	JBehave
A framework makes it easy to write small tests, yet scales to support complex functional testing for applications and libraries. It is a mature full-featured Python testing tool.	It is a Java-based framework supporting Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD), an evolution of Test-Driven Development (TDD) and Acceptance-Test Driven Developement (ATDD).
Auto-discovery; Modular fixtures	Behaviour-Driven Development; Java-based framework
Statistics
GitHub Stars 13.2K	GitHub Stars 34
GitHub Forks 2.9K	GitHub Forks 18
Stacks 4.0K	Stacks 9
Followers 307	Followers 18
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
PyCharm	Groovy Java Ruby Scala

What are some alternatives to pytest, JBehave?

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Related Comparisons

JBehave vs pytest: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Language Support: JBehave is primarily designed for Java-based applications, while pytest is used for testing Python applications. This difference in language support makes it essential for developers to choose a testing framework that aligns with the programming language of their application.
Syntax: JBehave uses a behavior-driven development (BDD) approach, which involves writing test scenarios in a natural language format. On the other hand, pytest follows a more traditional test-driven development (TDD) approach, where test cases are written using Python code. The syntax differences can impact how test cases are written and maintained in each framework.
Reporting: JBehave provides comprehensive reporting features that allow developers to generate detailed test reports, including test results and statistics. In contrast, pytest offers more minimalist reporting capabilities, which may be sufficient for some projects but lacking in detail for others. Developers should consider their reporting needs when selecting a testing framework.
Fixture Management: pytest offers robust fixture management capabilities, making it easier for developers to set up and tear down test environments. JBehave, while still capable of managing fixtures, may require more manual intervention in setting up test environments. The difference in fixture management can impact the ease and efficiency of writing and executing test cases.
Community and Ecosystem: Both JBehave and pytest have active communities and support extensive ecosystems of plugins and extensions. However, the size and specific offerings of these communities may vary. Developers should consider the availability of community support and relevant plugins when choosing a testing framework for their projects.
Integration with Other Tools: JBehave and pytest both support integration with various tools and frameworks, such as build servers and continuous integration systems. However, the ease of integration and compatibility with specific tools may differ between the two frameworks. Developers should evaluate how well each framework integrates with their existing development workflow.

JBehave vs pytest

Overview