JBoss Seam vs Meteor

Overview

Meteor

Stacks1.9K

Followers1.8K

Votes1.7K

GitHub Stars44.8K

Forks5.3K

JBoss Seam

Stacks8

Followers15

Votes0

GitHub Stars32

Forks51

JBoss Seam vs Meteor: What are the differences?

Introduction: JBoss Seam and Meteor are both popular frameworks used for web development, but they have key differences that set them apart.

Architecture: JBoss Seam is built on Java EE technology and follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, while Meteor is a full-stack platform that uses Node.js on the server-side and JavaScript on the client-side, following a reactive programming model.
Real-time capabilities: Meteor has built-in real-time data synchronization between the server and clients, allowing for instant updates without the need for manual refreshing. JBoss Seam, on the other hand, does not natively support real-time capabilities and requires additional libraries or tools for achieving similar functionalities.
Scalability: Meteor is designed to be highly scalable out of the box, with features like distributed data and load balancing. JBoss Seam, being based on Java EE, can also be scaled horizontally, but it may require more configuration and setup compared to Meteor.
Community and support: Meteor has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, forums, and packages available through its Atmosphere package manager. JBoss Seam, while still supported by Red Hat, has seen a decline in community activity and support since its transition to Jakarta EE and other frameworks.
Learning curve: JBoss Seam, being based on Java EE, may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with Java and enterprise development practices. Meteor, with its JavaScript-centric approach, is often considered more beginner-friendly and easier to pick up for web developers.
Deployment and hosting: Meteor offers a convenient deployment process through its Galaxy hosting platform, which supports automatic scaling and monitoring. JBoss Seam, being a Java-based framework, requires a traditional application server setup for deployment, which may involve more complexity and maintenance efforts.

In Summary, JBoss Seam and Meteor differ in architecture, real-time capabilities, scalability, community support, learning curve, and deployment processes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Meteor, JBoss Seam

Carl-Erik

Jan 23, 2020

Decided

This basically came down to two things: performance on compute-heavy tasks and a need for good tooling. We used to have a Meteor based Node.js application which worked great for RAD and getting a working prototype in a short time, but we felt pains trying to scale it, especially when doing anything involving crunching data, which Node sucks at. We also had bad experience with tooling support for doing large scale refactorings in Javascript compared to the best-in-class tools available for Java (IntelliJ). Given the heavy domain and very involved logic we wanted good tooling support to be able to do great refactorings that are just not possible in Javascript. Java is an old warhorse, but it performs fantastically and we have not regretted going down this route, avoiding "enterprise" smells and going as lightweight as we can, using Jdbi instead of Persistence API, a homegrown Actor Model library for massive concurrency, etc ...

374k views374k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Meteor	JBoss Seam
A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.	It is an application framework for Enterprise Java. It is inspired by the following principles: One kind of "stuff" Seam defines a uniform component model for all business logic in your application.
Pure JavaScript;Live page updates;Clean, powerful data synchronization;Latency compensation;Hot Code Pushes;Sensitive code runs in a privileged environment;Fully self-contained application bundles; Interoperability;Smart Packages	Solder; Apache DeltaSpike; Seam Catch; Apache DeltaSpike; Seam Config; Apache Aries
Statistics
GitHub Stars 44.8K	GitHub Stars 32
GitHub Forks 5.3K	GitHub Forks 51
Stacks 1.9K	Stacks 8
Followers 1.8K	Followers 15
Votes 1.7K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 251 Real-time 200 Full stack, one language 183 Best app dev platform available today 155 Data synchronization 152 Javascript Cons 5 Does not scale well 4 Hard to debug issues on the server-side 4 Heavily CPU bound	No community feedback yet
Integrations
AngularJS React MongoDB Node.js Apache Cordova	Java Jira Java EE

What are some alternatives to Meteor, JBoss Seam?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

JBoss Seam vs Meteor: What are the differences?

Introduction: JBoss Seam and Meteor are both popular frameworks used for web development, but they have key differences that set them apart.

Architecture: JBoss Seam is built on Java EE technology and follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, while Meteor is a full-stack platform that uses Node.js on the server-side and JavaScript on the client-side, following a reactive programming model.
Real-time capabilities: Meteor has built-in real-time data synchronization between the server and clients, allowing for instant updates without the need for manual refreshing. JBoss Seam, on the other hand, does not natively support real-time capabilities and requires additional libraries or tools for achieving similar functionalities.
Scalability: Meteor is designed to be highly scalable out of the box, with features like distributed data and load balancing. JBoss Seam, being based on Java EE, can also be scaled horizontally, but it may require more configuration and setup compared to Meteor.
Community and support: Meteor has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, forums, and packages available through its Atmosphere package manager. JBoss Seam, while still supported by Red Hat, has seen a decline in community activity and support since its transition to Jakarta EE and other frameworks.
Learning curve: JBoss Seam, being based on Java EE, may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with Java and enterprise development practices. Meteor, with its JavaScript-centric approach, is often considered more beginner-friendly and easier to pick up for web developers.
Deployment and hosting: Meteor offers a convenient deployment process through its Galaxy hosting platform, which supports automatic scaling and monitoring. JBoss Seam, being a Java-based framework, requires a traditional application server setup for deployment, which may involve more complexity and maintenance efforts.

In Summary, JBoss Seam and Meteor differ in architecture, real-time capabilities, scalability, community support, learning curve, and deployment processes.