StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Jersey vs Kuma

Jersey vs Kuma

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jersey
Jersey
Stacks217
Followers125
Votes6
Kuma
Kuma
Stacks16
Followers95
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.3K
Forks169

Kuma vs Jersey: What are the differences?

Kuma: Build, Secure and Observe your modern Service Mesh. It is a universal open source control-plane for Service Mesh and Microservices that can run and be operated natively across both Kubernetes and VM environments, in order to be easily adopted by every team in the organization; Jersey: *A REST framework that provides a JAX-RS implementation *. It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

Kuma and Jersey can be categorized as "Microservices" tools.

Some of the features offered by Kuma are:

  • Universal Control Plane
  • Lightweight Data Plane
  • Automatic

On the other hand, Jersey provides the following key features:

  • Track the JAX-RS API and provide regular releases of production quality Reference Implementations that ships with GlassFish
  • Provide APIs to extend Jersey & Build a community of users and developers
  • Make it easy to build RESTful Web services utilizing Java and the Java Virtual Machine.

Kuma is an open source tool with 944 GitHub stars and 40 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Kuma's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jersey, Kuma

Mohammed
Mohammed

CTO at Famcare

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

One of our applications is currently migrating to AWS, and we need to make a decision between using AWS API Gateway with AWS App Mesh, or Kong API Gateway with Kuma.

Some people advise us to benefit from AWS managed services, while others raise the vendor lock issue. So, I need your advice on that, and if there is any other important factor rather than vendor locking that I must take into consideration.

38.8k views38.8k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jersey
Jersey
Kuma
Kuma

It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

It is a universal open source control-plane for Service Mesh and Microservices that can run and be operated natively across both Kubernetes and VM environments, in order to be easily adopted by every team in the organization.

Track the JAX-RS API and provide regular releases of production quality Reference Implementations that ships with GlassFish; Provide APIs to extend Jersey & Build a community of users and developers; Make it easy to build RESTful Web services utilizing Java and the Java Virtual Machine.
Universal Control Plane; Lightweight Data Plane; Automatic; Multi-Tenancy; Network Security; Traffic Segmentation: With flexible ACL rules
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
2.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
169
Stacks
217
Stacks
16
Followers
125
Followers
95
Votes
6
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Lightweight
  • 1
    Java standard
  • 1
    Fast Performance With Microservices
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Oracle
Oracle
Java
Java
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Java EE
Java EE
Eclipse
Eclipse
YAML
YAML
CentOS
CentOS
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
macOS
macOS
Debian
Debian
Ubuntu
Ubuntu

What are some alternatives to Jersey, Kuma?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot