StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. Jetpack vs ManageWP

Jetpack vs ManageWP

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jetpack
Jetpack
Stacks79
Followers43
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks29
ManageWP
ManageWP
Stacks4
Followers0
Votes0

Jetpack vs ManageWP: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of website management tools, Jetpack and ManageWP are commonly used to optimize websites and enhance their functionality. While they both serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two that users should be aware of.

  1. Functionality: Jetpack is a powerful plugin developed by WordPress that offers a wide range of features such as website security, performance optimization, and marketing tools. On the other hand, ManageWP is a centralized dashboard that allows users to manage multiple WordPress sites from a single interface, providing features like backups, updates, and uptime monitoring.

  2. Pricing Model: Jetpack offers a freemium model with different pricing tiers based on the features and functionalities required by the user. In contrast, ManageWP has a subscription-based pricing model where users pay a monthly fee per website they manage.

  3. Backup and Restore: When it comes to backup and restore functionality, Jetpack offers automated daily backups with easy restore options. ManageWP also provides backup features, but users have more control over the frequency of backups and can store them externally or in the cloud.

  4. Security Features: Jetpack includes basic security features like brute force attack protection, downtime monitoring, and secure logins. ManageWP, on the other hand, offers more advanced security options such as two-factor authentication, security checkups, and malware scanning.

  5. Team Collaboration: ManageWP allows multiple users to collaborate on managing websites through user roles and permissions, enabling teams to work together efficiently. Jetpack does not have built-in team collaboration features, focusing more on individual website optimization and management.

In Summary, Jetpack and ManageWP differ in functionality, pricing model, backup and restore options, security features, and team collaboration capabilities, catering to different needs and preferences of website owners and managers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Jetpack
Jetpack
ManageWP
ManageWP

Jetpack wraps webpack to create a smoother developer experience. Jetpack can be used instead of webpack, webpack-cli, webpack-dev-server and webpack-dev-middleware without writing any configuration. Jetpack is a thin wrapper around webpack, and can be extended with any of the webpack configuration.

Manage multiple WordPress websites from one dashboard. Schedule backups, migrate WordPress website, automate updates, monitor website traffic and SEO

Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
29
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
79
Stacks
4
Followers
43
Followers
0
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
React
React
Babel
Babel
Webpack
Webpack
PostCSS
PostCSS
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Jetpack, ManageWP?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Webpack

Webpack

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Backpack

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

Vite

Vite

It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.

Pingy CLI

Pingy CLI

Gulp and Grunt and other heavyweight build tools are great for complicated build workflows. Sometimes you want something simpler that doesn't take lots of configuration to get up and running. That's Pingy CLI.

Microbundle

Microbundle

Zero-configuration bundler for tiny modules, powered by Rollup.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot