JHipster vs Node.js

Overview

Node.js

Stacks200.4K

Followers164.5K

Votes8.5K

GitHub Stars114.1K

Forks33.7K

JHipster

Stacks200

Followers327

Votes0

GitHub Stars22.2K

Forks4.1K

JHipster vs Node.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

JHipster and Node.js are both popular tools used in web development. However, there are key differences between the two. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail.

Architecture and Frameworks: JHipster is a development platform that combines Spring Boot with Angular or React to create a full-stack web application. It provides a pre-configured setup with various tools and libraries. On the other hand, Node.js is a runtime environment that allows developers to build server-side applications using JavaScript. It provides flexibility in choosing frameworks, such as Express.js, to develop web applications.
Language: JHipster primarily uses Java as the programming language for backend development, which is a statically typed language. Node.js, on the other hand, uses JavaScript, a dynamically typed language, for both backend and frontend development. This difference in language can impact development practices and developer preferences.
Scalability and Performance: JHipster applications are usually deployed on a Java web server, such as Apache Tomcat, which provides good scalability and performance for enterprise-scale applications. Node.js, on the other hand, has a non-blocking, event-driven architecture that allows for high scalability and performance in handling concurrent requests.
Ecosystem and Community: JHipster benefits from the extensive Java ecosystem and the large community of Java developers. It has access to a wide range of libraries, tools, and resources for enterprise development. Node.js, on the other hand, has a rapidly growing ecosystem and a large community of JavaScript developers. It has a wide range of modules and libraries available through npm, the Node package manager.
Development Speed and Productivity: JHipster provides a jHipster generator that automates the creation of a project with a predefined structure and configuration. It aims to increase development speed and productivity by providing ready-to-use features and scaffolding capabilities. Node.js, on the other hand, allows for rapid prototyping and development due to its lightweight and flexible nature.
Integration with Existing Systems: JHipster is well-suited for integrating with existing enterprise systems and databases, thanks to its Java backend. It can easily connect to existing Java libraries and databases, leveraging the Java ecosystem. Node.js, on the other hand, provides flexibility in integrating with various systems and databases through its JavaScript ecosystem and popular modules.

In summary, JHipster and Node.js differ in their choice of architecture, language, scalability, ecosystem, development speed, and integration capabilities. These differences impact the development approach, preferences, and target applications of these tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Node.js, JHipster

abderrahmane

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

I am a front-end guy and in the last month I've been trynig to be learn backend in python. I think python is a great language to but when i start to learn django I didn't like it because everythong is already done for you, you dont need to do much make it works and I like coding thing that take me time. I've been thinking about switching to another programing language or just learn Node js and stick with it. I need to know if django is that easy.

136k views136k

Comments

Mohammad

Oct 28, 2019

Needs adviceon

Node.js

Laravel

PHP

I want to create a video sharing service like Youtube, which users can use to upload and watch videos. I prefer to use Vue.js for front-end. What do you suggest for the back-end? @{Node.js}|tool:1011| or @{Laravel}|tool:992| ( @{PHP}|tool:991| ) I need a good performance with high speed, and the most important thing is the ability to handle user's requests if the site's traffic increases. I want to create an algorithm that users who watch others videos earn points (randomly but in clear context) If you have anything else to improve, please let me know. For eg: If you prefer React to Vue.js. Thanks in advance

309k views309k

Comments

Zubair

Director at Aafiyah Technologies

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

Hi Team

I want your suggestions in order for me to decide which stack is suitable for the below-mentioned requirement.

Currently, I am considering building it in Wordpress (Starting with prebuilt plugins and develop on it)

But I am skeptical, so I am considering Laravel.

And recently I found one very good solution built in Angular, Node and MySQL

Here are the high-level goals I am trying to achieve:

The system has 3 modules

Multi-Vendor e-commerce Market Place
Peer to peer Selling of used items
Listing/ Directory kind of portal for the service industry

290k views290k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Node.js	JHipster
Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.	It is a free and open-source application generator used to quickly develop modern web applications and Microservices using Spring Boot + Angular / React / Vue.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 114.1K	GitHub Stars 22.2K
GitHub Forks 33.7K	GitHub Forks 4.1K
Stacks 200.4K	Stacks 200
Followers 164.5K	Followers 327
Votes 8.5K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1439 Npm 1279 Javascript 1129 Great libraries 1012 High-performance 805 Open source Cons 46 Bound to a single CPU 45 New framework every day 40 Lots of terrible examples on the internet 33 Asynchronous programming is the worst 24 Callback	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Node.js, JHipster?

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

JHipster vs Node.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

JHipster and Node.js are both popular tools used in web development. However, there are key differences between the two. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail.

Architecture and Frameworks: JHipster is a development platform that combines Spring Boot with Angular or React to create a full-stack web application. It provides a pre-configured setup with various tools and libraries. On the other hand, Node.js is a runtime environment that allows developers to build server-side applications using JavaScript. It provides flexibility in choosing frameworks, such as Express.js, to develop web applications.
Language: JHipster primarily uses Java as the programming language for backend development, which is a statically typed language. Node.js, on the other hand, uses JavaScript, a dynamically typed language, for both backend and frontend development. This difference in language can impact development practices and developer preferences.
Scalability and Performance: JHipster applications are usually deployed on a Java web server, such as Apache Tomcat, which provides good scalability and performance for enterprise-scale applications. Node.js, on the other hand, has a non-blocking, event-driven architecture that allows for high scalability and performance in handling concurrent requests.
Ecosystem and Community: JHipster benefits from the extensive Java ecosystem and the large community of Java developers. It has access to a wide range of libraries, tools, and resources for enterprise development. Node.js, on the other hand, has a rapidly growing ecosystem and a large community of JavaScript developers. It has a wide range of modules and libraries available through npm, the Node package manager.
Development Speed and Productivity: JHipster provides a jHipster generator that automates the creation of a project with a predefined structure and configuration. It aims to increase development speed and productivity by providing ready-to-use features and scaffolding capabilities. Node.js, on the other hand, allows for rapid prototyping and development due to its lightweight and flexible nature.
Integration with Existing Systems: JHipster is well-suited for integrating with existing enterprise systems and databases, thanks to its Java backend. It can easily connect to existing Java libraries and databases, leveraging the Java ecosystem. Node.js, on the other hand, provides flexibility in integrating with various systems and databases through its JavaScript ecosystem and popular modules.

JHipster vs Node.js

Overview

JHipster vs Node.js: What are the differences?