Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jitsi vs Webex: What are the differences?
## Key Differences between Jitsi and Webex
Jitsi is an open-source video conferencing platform that allows for secure communication, while Webex is a video conferencing platform developed by Cisco. One key difference between the two is that Jitsi offers end-to-end encryption, ensuring that all communication is secure and private. On the other hand, Webex provides enterprise-grade security measures to protect sensitive information exchanged during meetings.
## 1. Scalability:
Jitsi is more suitable for small to medium-sized teams or organizations due to its simplicity and ease of use. In contrast, Webex is designed to accommodate large-scale meetings and conferences, making it a better choice for enterprises with a larger user base.
## 2. Integration with Other Platforms:
Jitsi offers limited integration options with third-party applications and platforms, making it less versatile for organizations with diverse software needs. On the other hand, Webex provides seamless integration with popular collaboration tools such as Microsoft Teams, Slack, and Google Calendar, enhancing productivity and workflow efficiency.
## 3. Customization Options:
Jitsi allows for a high degree of customization, including branding options, UI modifications, and feature extensions, enabling organizations to tailor the platform to their specific requirements. Webex, while offering some customization features, is more limited in terms of branding and UI alterations, potentially restricting the level of personalization available to users.
## 4. Meeting Recording and Storage:
Jitsi offers limited recording and storage capabilities for meetings, with users typically relying on external solutions for long-term archiving of meeting content. In comparison, Webex provides robust recording and storage features, allowing users to easily save, access, and manage meeting recordings within the platform itself.
## 5. Accessibility and Device Compatibility:
Jitsi is known for its accessibility and device compatibility, supporting a wide range of operating systems and devices, including Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android. Webex, while also offering broad compatibility, may have certain limitations on specific devices or operating systems, potentially affecting user experience and participation.
## 6. Pricing and Licensing:
Jitsi is a free, open-source platform that does not require any licensing fees, making it a cost-effective option for organizations looking to implement video conferencing solutions on a budget. In contrast, Webex operates on a subscription-based model, with various pricing tiers depending on the features and capabilities needed, which may be more suitable for enterprises with specific requirements and budget allocations.
In Summary, Jitsi stands out for its end-to-end encryption, scalability, and customization options, while Webex excels in integration with other platforms, meeting recording and storage capabilities, and enterprise-grade security measures.
For weeks I have been researching to find an open source video conferencing platform that allows integration from native clients. I am working on a solution that would need to communicate from a native app via a windows dll (at least initially). Ultimately, I want any OS to talk to it natively. A lot of platforms provide the JavaScript interface (like Jitsi) but wrapping this in a windows dll is both complicated and has a huge footprint. What open source video conference servers are available that have native windows clients that can be packaged in a DLL?
Hi Mark! I work for a company called Whereby where we allow developers to easily embed video meetings on their app or website using a simple API. If you're interesting in hearing more you can contact me on maddy.trusewich@whereby.com
Check us out --> https://whereby.com/information/embedded/
I don't recommended to use WebRTC for group meeting because when you have a lot of participants of a meeting so in this case, it will happen hung in the connection because the stream pass over http, also webRTC support maximum 256 participants of a group meeting. webRTC is good for calling peer to peer. you can use zoom program and then integrate it with your project via api or embedded system
I don't have recommendation yet but I have a question to understand further - what stops you writing your own code using webrtc? Peerjs could help speed up the development. My experience writing webrtc client was that it is super easy to get started with and build something useful out of it. But to make it fault tolerant(addressing challenges such as firewall, NAT traversal, etc.), there is a significant effort you need to make - signalling server, ICE/TURN/STUN servers, etc.
Hi, I am helping teachers in my kid's schools to set up distance learning and wanted to see what is better between Webex, Zoom, and Skype (although only putting this one in as most parents probably have it). The children are 8-9, so they won't be using it on their own and the parents have no experience using Webex or Zoom.
The main use will be for the teacher to explain what they will be covering in the week and enable some social interaction between the kids.
I need to be easy to use for about 20-25 people.
Thanks for your advice, Lisa
I consider Skype dead. Even Microsoft strongly neglected it. Webex is more corporate-oriented. So for your use case, I recommend Zoom. It is easy to set up, and the quality is very good. Zoom became such a household name that the average person heard about it. Moreover, any person probably has friends who may have used it. So it will be easier for people to get some community help.
Hi, Lisa,
I haven't used Skype in a long time. I have I lot of experience with Zoom and Webex. Both for me are very good tools, especially if you have money to pay for (to unlock more features, like more people in a video conference - Zoom).
Nowadays, I've used more Webex with my undergraduate students, I'm using the free account. Cloud recording is a features very useful, especially while using the free account (thanks Cisco!). Webex has control features very useful (e.g., mute, raise hand etc).
Kind regards,
We've been using Zoom for about a half a year and it's stability is unbeatable. We have all-hands on Fridays with 100+ participants. The free tier can easily handle the requirements, the only limitation is that max meeting length is 40 minutes. After that you can immediately restart the meeting, but the pro option is also very affordable. It also features screen sharing and whiteboard sharing out of the box. I also appreciate that it's not mandatory to register an account to attend a meeting.
From my experiences I feel like Zoom is a pretty intuitive program to teach kids, however Skype might be more common amongst them already.
I am a big fan of Microsoft Teams.
They all do the same pretty much but Teams I find the bells and whistles are easier to find, like custom backgrounds... creating groups for topic discussions that remain there until you want to change/edit or delete. Easy to share files.
Pros of Jitsi
- Open Source32
- Entirely free conferencing20
- Unlimited time19
- Accessible from browser5
- Desktop, app and browser tab sharing3
- WebRTC standard3
- Secure & encrypted video conference2
- Great API to develop with2
- Live stream to youtube2
- Dial-In and Dial-Out via SIP1
- Full HD1
- FSB Approved1
- Share youtube videos in conference1
- Easy installation and good support1
- MCU0
Pros of Webex
- Secure5
- Good branding - Cisco3
- High Quality3
- Easy to Use3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Jitsi
- UnLimited time7
- No multiplatform5
- Great quality1
- Good support1
- Live conference statistics1
- Great features1
Cons of Webex
- Horrible voice quality, voice gaps, drops1