StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Video Hosting
  4. Web And Video Conferencing
  5. Jitsi vs WebRTC

Jitsi vs WebRTC

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

WebRTC
WebRTC
Stacks322
Followers538
Votes6
Jitsi
Jitsi
Stacks251
Followers720
Votes93
GitHub Stars4.3K
Forks983

Jitsi vs WebRTC: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Jitsi and WebRTC are both communication platforms that enable real-time audio and video communication. While their purposes are similar, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Architecture: Jitsi is a video conferencing platform that uses WebRTC for its real-time communication. It provides a complete conference solution with features like screen sharing and chat. WebRTC, on the other hand, is a free, open-source project that provides protocols and APIs for real-time communication directly between web browsers.

  2. Customizability: Jitsi offers a high level of customizability, allowing developers to modify the user interface and add new features according to their requirements. WebRTC, on the other hand, provides a lower-level API that leaves more implementation details to the developers, providing them with greater flexibility but also requiring more expertise.

  3. Scalability: Jitsi is designed for small to medium-sized conferences and can handle a limited number of participants efficiently. In contrast, WebRTC is more scalable and can handle a larger number of participants, making it suitable for larger conferences or applications with higher user loads.

  4. Infrastructure: Jitsi requires its own dedicated infrastructure for hosting the video conference servers, which can be either on-premises or in the cloud. WebRTC, on the other hand, leverages the existing infrastructure of web browsers, eliminating the need for dedicated servers.

  5. Integration: Jitsi provides integration options with popular messaging platforms like Slack and Microsoft Teams, allowing users to seamlessly incorporate video conferencing into their existing workflows. WebRTC, however, is a standalone technology that does not offer built-in integrations and requires developers to implement the necessary integrations themselves.

  6. Ecosystem: Jitsi benefits from a robust and active community that continuously contributes to its development, adding new features and fixing bugs. WebRTC has a larger ecosystem as it is a core technology used by various real-time communication platforms, resulting in a wider range of available libraries, frameworks, and resources.

In summary, Jitsi is a video conferencing platform built on top of WebRTC, providing a complete conference solution with customization options and integrations. WebRTC, on the other hand, is a versatile technology that allows for real-time communication directly between web browsers, offering scalability and a larger ecosystem but requiring more development expertise.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on WebRTC, Jitsi

Ritwik
Ritwik

May 27, 2020

Needs adviceonWebRTCWebRTCAmazon ChimeAmazon ChimeAgoraAgora

Hello. So, I wanted to make a decision on whether to use WebRTC or Amazon Chime for a conference call (meeting). My plan is to build an app with features like video broadcasting, and the ability for all the participants to talk and chat. I have used Agora's web SDK for video broadcasting, and Socket.IO for chat features. As I read the comparison between Amazon Chime and WebRTC, it further intrigues me on what I should use given my scenario? Is there any way that so many related technologies could be a hindrance to the other? Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks. Ritwik Neema

463k views463k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

WebRTC
WebRTC
Jitsi
Jitsi

It is a free, open project that enables web browsers with Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities via simple JavaScript APIs. The WebRTC components have been optimized to best serve this purpose.

Jitsi (acquired by 8x8) is a set of open-source projects that allows you to easily build and deploy secure videoconferencing solutions. At the heart of Jitsi are Jitsi Videobridge and Jitsi Meet, which let you have conferences on the internet, while other projects in the community enable other features such as audio, dial-in, recording, and simulcasting.

-
Web, Android, iOS, React-native, and Electron apps;Ubuntu and Debian Packages install in minutes;Customize with config files or change the code
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
4.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
983
Stacks
322
Stacks
251
Followers
538
Followers
720
Votes
6
Votes
93
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    OpenSource
  • 2
    No Download
  • 1
    You can write anything around it, because it's a protoc
Pros
  • 32
    Open Source
  • 20
    Entirely free conferencing
  • 19
    Unlimited time
  • 5
    Accessible from browser
  • 3
    Desktop, app and browser tab sharing
Cons
  • 7
    UnLimited time
  • 5
    No multiplatform
  • 1
    Great quality
  • 1
    Great features
  • 1
    Good support

What are some alternatives to WebRTC, Jitsi?

Discord

Discord

Discord is a modern free voice & text chat app for groups of gamers. Our resilient Erlang backend running on the cloud has built in DDoS protection with automatic server failover.

Skype

Skype

Skype’s text, voice and video make it simple to share experiences with the people that matter to you, wherever they are.

Zoom

Zoom

Zoom unifies cloud video conferencing, simple online meetings, and cross platform group chat into one easy-to-use platform. Our solution offers the best video, audio, and screen-sharing experience across Zoom Rooms, Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, and H.323/SIP room systems.

Google Meet

Google Meet

It is the business-oriented version of Google's Hangouts platform and is suitable for businesses of all sizes. It allows users to dial in phone numbers to access meetings, thus enabling users with slow internet connection to call in.

Webex

Webex

Collaborate with colleagues across your organization, or halfway across the planet. Meet online and share files, information, and expertise. Collaborate from wherever you are with Webex mobile apps for IPhone, iPad, Android, or Blackberry. If you can get online, you can work together.

Viber

Viber

It is a cross-platform instant messaging and voice over IP application provided as freeware for the Microsoft Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS platforms.

Jami

Jami

It is a free software for universal communication which respects freedoms and privacy of its users. Its main goal is to provide a communication framework and end-user applications to make audio or video calls, send text messages and make generic data transfers. It makes this possible via multiple paradigms: a modern decentralized approach using a DHT to find peers or classical centralized SIP as a soft-phone.

TeamViewer

TeamViewer

Its aproprietary software for remote control, desktop sharing, online meetings, web conferencing and file transfer between computers.

Hangouts

Hangouts

It is a communication platform which includes messaging, video chat, and VOIP features.

GoToMeeting

GoToMeeting

It is an online meeting, desktop sharing, and video conferencing software package that enables the user to meet with other computer users, customers, clients or colleagues via the Internet in real time.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack