Apache JMeter vs LoadNinja

Overview

Apache JMeter

Stacks435

Followers285

Votes10

LoadNinja

Stacks12

Followers40

Votes0

Apache JMeter vs LoadNinja: What are the differences?

Introduction Apache JMeter and LoadNinja are both performance testing tools used to measure the performance and load capabilities of web applications. While they share similarities in terms of their purpose, there are key differences between the two tools.

Architecture: Apache JMeter is a desktop application that can be installed on various operating systems and requires the user to manually set up and configure test scenarios. On the other hand, LoadNinja is a cloud-based solution that provides a web-based interface for setting up and running performance tests, eliminating the need for local installation and configuration.
Scripting Capabilities: Apache JMeter relies heavily on manual scripting for creating test scenarios and requires the user to have programming skills. It uses a scripting language called JavaSampler for creating custom test cases. In contrast, LoadNinja offers a scriptless approach where users can record their interactions with the application and automatically generate test scripts, making it more accessible to non-technical users.
Real Browser Testing: LoadNinja offers the ability to perform real browser testing by leveraging a real web browser for executing test scenarios. This allows for more accurate simulation of user interactions, including rendering and JavaScript execution. Apache JMeter, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for real browser testing and relies on simulated HTTP requests.
Collaboration and Reporting: LoadNinja provides features for team collaboration, including the ability to share test scenarios, collaborate on test scripts, and generate detailed reports. Apache JMeter, being a desktop application, lacks these collaboration features and requires manual effort for sharing and analyzing test results.
Scalability and Load Generation: LoadNinja is designed to scale up and generate high loads by leveraging multiple cloud-based servers. It offers easy scalability and distributed load generation capabilities, making it suitable for testing large-scale applications. Apache JMeter, although capable of generating load, may require additional infrastructure setup and configuration to achieve high scalability.
Pricing Model: Apache JMeter is an open-source tool and is available for free, making it a cost-effective option for performance testing. LoadNinja, on the other hand, is a commercial tool that requires a subscription, which may be a consideration for organizations with budget constraints.

In Summary, Apache JMeter and LoadNinja differ in terms of their architecture, scripting capabilities, real browser testing, collaboration and reporting features, scalability and load generation abilities, as well as their pricing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Apache JMeter, LoadNinja

Ratan

QA Manager at Verisys

Feb 12, 2020

Needs advice

I have a team that is not heavy on programming skills. I am looking for a load testing tool that is easy to use. Preferably, the tool should be a record and playback tool without much programming. Also, the tool should be able to test APIs apart from web-based applications. What tool should I opt for?

36.3k views36.3k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache JMeter	LoadNinja
It is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications but has since expanded to other test functions.	It is  a  cloud-based platform for engineers and performance professionals who load test web applications. It makes load testing simple and fast. Test your website and web apps on real browsers, in the cloud, without the need for dynamic correlation.
-	Reduce Test Script Creation Time by 60%; Generate Load with 1000s of Real Browsers; Analyze in Real-Time with VU Inspector and Debugger; Manage Your Performance Tests Efficiently & Effectively; Data-Drive Load Tests for Full Test Coverage; Test Applications in Local Network
Statistics
Stacks 435	Stacks 12
Followers 285	Followers 40
Votes 10	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 Requires no programming knowledge 3 Supports distributed 2 Open-source Cons 1 It's GUI-first 1 Too complicated	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Jenkins Zephyr

What are some alternatives to Apache JMeter, LoadNinja?

k6

It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.

Locust

Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.

Gatling

Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.

Loader.io

Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections.

BlazeMeter

Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>

RedLine13

It is a load testing platform that brings the low cost power of the cloud to JMeter and other open source load testing tools.

AWS Device Farm

Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors.

Flood IO

Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk.

Blitz

Build bulletproof, scalable solutions with Blitz - a simple and fun service for load testing web apps and APIs in the cloud. Blitz offers powerful yet simple capabilities including continuous monitoring, performance testing and remediation. Blitz enables you to instantly burst up to 50,000 concurrent users against your app in seconds from multiple points of presence around the world.

Artillery

It is a modern, open-source, powerful & easy-to-use performance testing toolkit. Use it to ship scalable applications that stay performant & resilient under high load. It prioritizes developer productivity and happiness and follows the “batteries-included” philosophy.

Related Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs LoadNinja: What are the differences?

Architecture: Apache JMeter is a desktop application that can be installed on various operating systems and requires the user to manually set up and configure test scenarios. On the other hand, LoadNinja is a cloud-based solution that provides a web-based interface for setting up and running performance tests, eliminating the need for local installation and configuration.
Scripting Capabilities: Apache JMeter relies heavily on manual scripting for creating test scenarios and requires the user to have programming skills. It uses a scripting language called JavaSampler for creating custom test cases. In contrast, LoadNinja offers a scriptless approach where users can record their interactions with the application and automatically generate test scripts, making it more accessible to non-technical users.
Real Browser Testing: LoadNinja offers the ability to perform real browser testing by leveraging a real web browser for executing test scenarios. This allows for more accurate simulation of user interactions, including rendering and JavaScript execution. Apache JMeter, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for real browser testing and relies on simulated HTTP requests.
Collaboration and Reporting: LoadNinja provides features for team collaboration, including the ability to share test scenarios, collaborate on test scripts, and generate detailed reports. Apache JMeter, being a desktop application, lacks these collaboration features and requires manual effort for sharing and analyzing test results.
Scalability and Load Generation: LoadNinja is designed to scale up and generate high loads by leveraging multiple cloud-based servers. It offers easy scalability and distributed load generation capabilities, making it suitable for testing large-scale applications. Apache JMeter, although capable of generating load, may require additional infrastructure setup and configuration to achieve high scalability.
Pricing Model: Apache JMeter is an open-source tool and is available for free, making it a cost-effective option for performance testing. LoadNinja, on the other hand, is a commercial tool that requires a subscription, which may be a consideration for organizations with budget constraints.

Apache JMeter vs LoadNinja

Overview