Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Apache JMeter

415
277
+ 1
10
Selenium

15.4K
12.3K
+ 1
525
Add tool

Apache JMeter vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Key Differences between Apache JMeter and Selenium:

1. **Purpose**:
Apache JMeter is primarily used for performance testing to measure the performance of web applications under varying loads, while Selenium is primarily used for functional testing to automate web browsers for testing web applications' functionality.

2. **Testing Level**:
JMeter is more suitable for testing at the application layer, simulating multiple user requests with different parameters to evaluate the performance, whereas Selenium operates at the GUI level, interacting with elements on web pages like a real user.

3. **Scripting Language**:
JMeter uses its own scripting language (Beanshell) for scripting test scenarios, making it simpler for performance testing, while Selenium supports various programming languages like Java, Python, and C# for writing test scripts, providing more flexibility for functional testing.

4. **Browser Compatibility**:
Selenium supports multiple browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer, allowing testers to conduct cross-browser testing, whereas JMeter does not interact directly with browsers but mimics browser behavior for load testing.

5. **Reporting**:
JMeter provides comprehensive test result analysis and reporting features like graphs and statistical data, which are essential for performance testing, while Selenium requires additional plugins or frameworks like TestNG or ExtentReports for generating detailed test reports.

6. **Learning Curve**:
JMeter has a relatively simpler learning curve compared to Selenium due to its user-friendly GUI for creating test plans, making it easier for beginners to start performance testing, while Selenium requires programming skills and familiarity with testing frameworks for writing effective test scripts, suitable for testers with programming knowledge. 

Summary: In Summary, Apache JMeter is ideal for performance testing web applications under varying loads with a simple learning curve, while Selenium is preferred for functional testing at the GUI level using various programming languages to automate web browsers for testing web application functionality.
Advice on Apache JMeter and Selenium
Needs advice
on
JestJestSeleniumSelenium
and
WebdriverIOWebdriverIO
in

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

See more
Replies (1)
Prashanth Marappa
Senior Software Engineer at Mphasis · | 1 upvotes · 215.5K views
Recommends
on
SeleniumSelenium

with the help of selenium we can automate react js for functional testing

See more
Ratan Sharmacharya
Needs advice
on
Apache JMeterApache JMeter
and
Loader.ioLoader.io

I have a team that is not heavy on programming skills. I am looking for a load testing tool that is easy to use. Preferably, the tool should be a record and playback tool without much programming. Also, the tool should be able to test APIs apart from web-based applications. What tool should I opt for?

See more
Replies (2)
Deepak Naik
Product Owner at Digite Infotech Private Limited · | 3 upvotes · 32.5K views

My choice would be Apache JMeter, It's free and opensource plus it comes with lots of plugins and extendability. Apache JMeter needs a small amount of a learning curve and a basic understanding of Network, Protocols (TCP/IP ports, HTTP(S) and REST/SOAP, etc.) for initial setup. But it doesn't require programming skills. it has a nice record and playback option. You can still carry on without the developer skillset if you follow these steps. 1. Take backup. 2. Start recording and interact with the application. 3. stop recording and save the test case. This will give you your test-bed, after this, after these steps, every time just do Restore from backup and then Playback and observer results.

If you have longer recordings then an understanding of how to modify the recorded scripts will come handy.

For some of the advanced features such as Configuring variables, implementing loops, throttling adding think time, and automating test scaling to the number of users will require good planning of test scenarios and a Developer experience but this is true for any tool (even loader.io)

See more
Pepe Ruiz
Head of Content at k6.io · | 2 upvotes · 32.2K views
Recommends
on
k6k6

Disclaimer: I work at k6, and I recommend you try our tool.

It might require some coding skills, but we support a few options to record a user session to autogenerate the load test. Read How to record a browser session with k6 OSS.

The k6 Cloud also supports recording a user session with a Browser Extension. Additionally, it provides a Test Builder UI to generate a load test for testing APIs.

If you have questions or need help, you can ask on Slack and the Community forum.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Apache JMeter
Pros of Selenium
  • 5
    Requires no programming knowledge
  • 3
    Supports distributed
  • 2
    Open-source
  • 175
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
  • 8
    Data crawling
  • 7
    Supports end to end testing
  • 6
    Easy set up
  • 6
    Functional testing
  • 4
    The Most flexible monitoring system
  • 3
    End to End Testing
  • 3
    Easy to integrate with build tools
  • 2
    Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm
  • 2
    Record and playback
  • 2
    Compatible with Python
  • 2
    Easy to scale
  • 2
    Integration Tests
  • 0
    Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Apache JMeter
Cons of Selenium
  • 1
    It's GUI-first
  • 1
    Too complicated
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Apache JMeter?

It is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications but has since expanded to other test functions.

What is Selenium?

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Apache JMeter?
What companies use Selenium?
See which teams inside your own company are using Apache JMeter or Selenium.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Apache JMeter?
What tools integrate with Selenium?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to Apache JMeter and Selenium?
Testrail
TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.
BlazeMeter
Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>
Postman
It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.
Gatling
Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.
Locust
Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.
See all alternatives