StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. JSON vs WebAssembly

JSON vs WebAssembly

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JSON
JSON
Stacks2.0K
Followers1.6K
Votes9
WebAssembly
WebAssembly
Stacks223
Followers218
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.2K
Forks818

JSON vs WebAssembly: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key differences between JSON and WebAssembly:

1. **Data Representation**: JSON is a lightweight data-interchange format that is easy for humans to read and write, primarily used for transmitting data between a server and web application. WebAssembly, on the other hand, is a binary instruction format designed for executable code in web pages, enabling high-performance applications on the web.

2. **Human-Readability**: JSON is human-readable and writable, making it easy for developers to work with during development and debugging. In contrast, WebAssembly is a binary format that is not intended to be human-readable or writable, but rather optimized for efficient execution by browsers.

3. **Purpose**: JSON is primarily used for data exchange between a server and a client, often in the form of APIs. WebAssembly, however, is used for running high-performance applications directly in the browser, allowing developers to port complex software to the web with near-native performance.

4. **Execution Environment**: JSON is not executable code and requires processing by an interpreter or parser to be used in an application. In contrast, WebAssembly is executed directly by the browser or runtime environment, providing faster execution speeds for complex applications compared to parsing and interpreting text-based formats like JSON.

5. **Security**: JSON is relatively safe for data exchange but can be vulnerable to injection attacks if not properly handled. WebAssembly, being a binary format, has built-in security features such as sandboxing to prevent malicious code execution, making it safer for running untrusted code in web applications.

6. **File Size**: JSON is text-based, which can lead to larger file sizes compared to the compact binary format of WebAssembly. This difference in file size can impact loading times and overall performance, especially for large applications that rely on extensive data transfer over the network.

In Summary, the key differences between JSON and WebAssembly lie in their data representation, human-readability, purpose, execution environment, security features, and file size, affecting their respective roles in data exchange and high-performance web applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on JSON, WebAssembly

Dhinesh
Dhinesh

architect

Jun 16, 2020

Needs adviceonJSONJSONPythonPython

Hi. Currently, I have a requirement where I have to create a new JSON file based on the input CSV file, validate the generated JSON file, and upload the JSON file into the application (which runs in AWS) using API. Kindly suggest the best language that can meet the above requirement. I feel Python will be better, but I am not sure with the justification of why python. Can you provide your views on this?

350k views350k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

JSON
JSON
WebAssembly
WebAssembly

JavaScript Object Notation is a lightweight data-interchange format. It is easy for humans to read and write. It is easy for machines to parse and generate. It is based on a subset of the JavaScript Programming Language.

It is an open standard that defines a portable binary code format for executable programs, and a corresponding textual assembly language, as well as interfaces for facilitating interactions between such programs and their host environment.

-
Efficient and fast; Safe; Open and debuggable; Part of the open web platform
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
818
Stacks
2.0K
Stacks
223
Followers
1.6K
Followers
218
Votes
9
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Simple
  • 4
    Widely supported
Cons
  • 2
    Security issues
Integrations
MongoDB
MongoDB
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL
MySQL
JavaScript
JavaScript
JSON Server
JSON Server
JSONlite
JSONlite
Rust
Rust
C++
C++
C lang
C lang

What are some alternatives to JSON, WebAssembly?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase