StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. Jsonnet vs Mustache

Jsonnet vs Mustache

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mustache
Mustache
Stacks2.4K
Followers415
Votes50
GitHub Stars16.7K
Forks2.4K
Jsonnet
Jsonnet
Stacks207
Followers37
Votes2
GitHub Stars7.4K
Forks468

Jsonnet vs Mustache: What are the differences?

Introduction:
JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) is a lightweight data-interchange format that is easy for humans to read and write. Jsonnet is a data-templating language that extends JSON and is used to generate JSON output. Mustache is a logic-less template syntax that can be used for any programming language.

1. **Differences in Logic**: Jsonnet allows for the introduction of logic and control structures in templates, making it more powerful in handling complex transformations and computations. Mustache, on the other hand, is designed to be logic-less and focuses on the separation of data and presentation, making it simpler and more straightforward in its approach.
2. **Inheritance and Composition**: Jsonnet supports inheritance and composition through mixins, allowing templates to inherit properties from other templates or combine multiple templates into a single one. Mustache does not natively offer support for inheritance or composition and relies on the inclusion of partials for reuse of template components.
3. **Variable Scope**: Jsonnet allows for the scoping of variables within different contexts, providing flexibility in managing variable definitions within templates. Mustache uses a simple context stack for variable lookup, limiting the scope of variables to a single level of hierarchy within the template.
4. **Conditional Rendering**: Jsonnet enables conditional rendering of template elements based on logical expressions, providing more control over the output based on specific conditions. Mustache supports basic conditional rendering through boolean values but lacks the ability for complex conditional logic.
5. **Inline Functions**: Jsonnet allows for the definition and invocation of inline functions within templates, enabling reusable code snippets and modularization of template logic. Mustache does not support the creation of inline functions within templates, requiring the implementation of logic outside the template itself.
6. **Extensibility**: Jsonnet offers more extensibility and customization options through its programming-like features, making it suitable for advanced template transformations and data processing tasks. Mustache, being logic-less, is limited in extensibility and is more focused on the separation of concerns between data and presentation.

In Summary, Jsonnet provides a more feature-rich and flexible approach to data templating with support for logic, inheritance, variable scoping, conditional rendering, inline functions, and extensive customization options, while Mustache adopts a simpler, logic-less approach with a focus on data and presentation separation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mustache
Mustache
Jsonnet
Jsonnet

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

It is a data templating language for app and tool developers. It is a powerful DSL for elegant description of JSON data.

-
Generate config data; Side-effect free; Organize, simplify, unify; Manage sprawling config
Statistics
GitHub Stars
16.7K
GitHub Stars
7.4K
GitHub Forks
2.4K
GitHub Forks
468
Stacks
2.4K
Stacks
207
Followers
415
Followers
37
Votes
50
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 29
    Dead simple templating
  • 12
    Open source
  • 8
    Small
  • 1
    Support in lots of languages
Pros
  • 1
    Data templating (not string templating)
  • 1
    Side-effect free
  • 0
    Dashboard as a code
Integrations
No integrations available
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Golang
Golang
C++
C++
Atom
Atom
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Vim
Vim
CodeMirror
CodeMirror
Sublime Text
Sublime Text
Emacs
Emacs

What are some alternatives to Mustache, Jsonnet?

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Slim Lang

Slim Lang

Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the view syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic. It started as an exercise to see how much could be removed from a standard html template (<, >, closing tags, etc...). As more people took an interest in Slim, the functionality grew and so did the flexibility of the syntax.

RactiveJS

RactiveJS

Ractive was originally created at theguardian.com to produce news applications. Ractive takes your Mustache templates and transforms them into a lightweight representation of the DOM – then when your data changes, it intelligently updates the real DOM.

EJS

EJS

It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.

Jinja

Jinja

It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.

Twig

Twig

It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

Nunjucks

Nunjucks

Rich Powerful language with block inheritance, autoescaping, macros, asynchronous control, and more. Heavily inspired by jinja2. It supports all modern browsers.

Hogan.js

Hogan.js

Hogan.js is a 3.4k JS templating engine developed at Twitter. Use it as a part of your asset packager to compile templates ahead of time or include it in your browser to handle dynamic templates.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase