StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Kafka Tools
  5. Kafka Manager vs Mosca

Kafka Manager vs Mosca

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kafka Manager
Kafka Manager
Stacks70
Followers173
Votes1
Mosca
Mosca
Stacks16
Followers43
Votes0

Kafka Manager vs Mosca: What are the differences?

What is Kafka Manager? A tool for managing Apache Kafka, developed by Yahoo. This interface makes it easier to identify topics which are unevenly distributed across the cluster or have partition leaders unevenly distributed across the cluster. It supports management of multiple clusters, preferred replica election, replica re-assignment, and topic creation. It is also great for getting a quick bird’s eye view of the cluster.

What is Mosca? A Node.js MQTT broker. A Node.js MQTT broker, which can be used as a Standalone Service or embedded in another Node.js application.

Kafka Manager and Mosca can be primarily classified as "Message Queue" tools.

Some of the features offered by Kafka Manager are:

  • Manage multiple clusters
  • Easy inspection of cluster state (topics, brokers, replica distribution, partition distribution)
  • Run preferred replica election

On the other hand, Mosca provides the following key features:

  • MQTT 3.1 and 3.1.1 compliant
  • QoS 0 and QoS 1
  • Various storage options for QoS 1 offline packets, and subscriptions

Kafka Manager and Mosca are both open source tools. It seems that Kafka Manager with 7.56K GitHub stars and 1.84K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Mosca with 2.84K GitHub stars and 501 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Kafka Manager
Kafka Manager
Mosca
Mosca

This interface makes it easier to identify topics which are unevenly distributed across the cluster or have partition leaders unevenly distributed across the cluster. It supports management of multiple clusters, preferred replica election, replica re-assignment, and topic creation. It is also great for getting a quick bird’s eye view of the cluster.

A Node.js MQTT broker, which can be used as a Standalone Service or embedded in another Node.js application.

Manage multiple clusters;Easy inspection of cluster state (topics, brokers, replica distribution, partition distribution);Run preferred replica election;Generate partition assignments (based on current state of cluster);Run reassignment of partition (based on generated assignments)
MQTT 3.1 and 3.1.1 compliant; QoS 0 and QoS 1; Various storage options for QoS 1 offline packets, and subscriptions; Usable inside ANY other Node.js app;
Statistics
Stacks
70
Stacks
16
Followers
173
Followers
43
Votes
1
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Better Insights for Kafka cluster
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Kafka
Kafka
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Kafka Manager, Mosca?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Memphis

Memphis

Highly scalable and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming apps fast.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase