Karma vs Nemo.js: What are the differences?
Karma and Nemo.js can be primarily classified as "Browser Testing" tools.
Some of the features offered by Karma are:
- Test on Real Devices
- Remote Control
- Testing Framework Agnostic
On the other hand, Nemo.js provides the following key features:
- Nemo.js wraps around the ubiquitous Selenium WebDriver, and as such, allows control of virtually any browser on any operating system
- Built with a plugin architecture
- Easy interface for authoring new plugins that can then be shared with others
Karma and Nemo.js are both open source tools. It seems that Karma with 10.7K GitHub stars and 1.61K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Nemo.js with 5 GitHub stars and 4 GitHub forks.
What is Karma?
What is Nemo.js?
Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose Nemo.js?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Karma?
What are the cons of using Nemo.js?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
All services, directives and controllers from angular are tested using Karma.